You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jeremy Hanna (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/07/18 15:01:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-15803) Separate out allow filtering scanning through a partition versus scanning over the table

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17568052#comment-17568052 ] 

Jeremy Hanna commented on CASSANDRA-15803:
------------------------------------------

I could see this getting added to the guardrails framework - separating out cluster scanning from partition scanning as two separate guardrails.

> Separate out allow filtering scanning through a partition versus scanning over the table
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15803
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15803
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: CQL/Syntax
>            Reporter: Jeremy Hanna
>            Priority: Normal
>
> Currently allow filtering can mean two things in the spirit of "avoid operations that don't seek to a specific row or sequential rows of data."  First, it can mean scanning across the entire table to meet the criteria of the query.  That's almost always a bad thing and should be discouraged or disabled (see CASSANDRA-8303).  Second, it can mean filtering within a specific partition.  For example, in a query you could specify the full partition key and if you specify a criterion on a non-key field, it requires allow filtering.
> The second reason to require allow filtering is significantly less work to scan through a partition.  It is still extra work over seeking to a specific row and getting N sequential rows though.  So while an application developer and/or operator needs to be cautious about this second type, it's not necessarily a bad thing, depending on the table and the use case.
> I propose that we separate the way to specify allow filtering across an entire table from specifying allow filtering across a partition in a backwards compatible way.  One idea that was brought up in Slack in the cassandra-dev room was to have allow filtering mean the superset - scanning across the table.  Then if you want to specify that you *only* want to scan within a partition you would use something like
> {{ALLOW FILTERING [WITHIN PARTITION]}}
> So it will succeed if you specify non-key criteria within a single partition, but fail with a message to say it requires the full allow filtering.  This would allow for a backwards compatible full allow filtering while allowing a user to specify that they want to just scan within a partition, but error out if trying to scan a full table.
> This is potentially also related to the capability limitation framework by which operators could more granularly specify what features are allowed or disallowed per user, discussed in CASSANDRA-8303.  This way an operator could disallow the more general allow filtering while allowing the partition scan (or disallow them both at their discretion).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org