XForms & Wicket (was: Nested forms)

[Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>]

That should be doable, but someone with enough knowledge of XForms,
and preferably someone who is actually going to use that should
implement it. Maybe you? ;)

Eelco

On 11/6/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe is off topic in this thread, but what about XForm in wicket?
>
> http://ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-xformstipmultipleforms/index.html?ca=drs-
>
> Do plan to support it in future releases?
>
> Bye
>
> - Paolo
>
>
> On 11/5/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > the idea of me was that the outer form extends the inner - as this is
> > closes
> > > to what happens in html. So yo still can process the inner one, as is a
> > > complete form, but when the outer one is processed, the inner onSubmit
> > etc.
> > > is overriden and therefore no other misunderstandings and errors should
> > > occur. This is also closest to the html form that is coming out - the
> > inner
> > > one can be processed, but if you do the outer one then the inner is
> > > processed too (in case of formouter extends form inner) and solely
> > processed
> > > in case of outer form doenst extend inner form.
> > >
> > > that is should be 2 seperate form is ok, if the developer wants to tread
> > > them seperately, if he wants to tread them together, he may use the
> > outer
> > > extending the inner. Sounds quite basic and easy to me.
> >
> > I wouldn't like to force clients use inheritance here. I think the
> > nested form use cases would more closely resemble composition and
> > furthermore, I don't think forcing inheritance would solve a real
> > problem here.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
>
>

Re: XForms & Wicket (was: Nested forms)

[Paolo Di Tommaso <pa...@gmail.com>]

I would like, but I'm not an XForm expert :)

Anyway I will try to take a look on it.

Paolo


On 11/6/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That should be doable, but someone with enough knowledge of XForms,
> and preferably someone who is actually going to use that should
> implement it. Maybe you? ;)
>
> Eelco