You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org by IKEBE Tomohiro <ik...@edge.co.jp> on 2003/01/28 13:32:43 UTC
Re: ap_unescape_url can't escape %uXXXX
I have written a little patch for libapreq which unescape
the %uXXXX style URI-escaped string.
the unescape algorithm is based on CGI.pm
At Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:55:54 +0900,
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
>
> It seems that Apache's ap_unescape_url() can't handle %uXXXX style
> URI-escaped Unicode string, hence Apache::Request cannot neighther,
> while CGI.pm can.
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
>
> --
> Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <mi...@edge.co.jp>
>
--
IKEBE Tomohiro <ik...@edge.co.jp>
Re: Re[2]: ap_unescape_url can't escape %uXXXX
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Lee Goddard <ho...@LeeGoddard.com> writes:
> Any idea if/when that'll be incorporated to the distributions?
>
> I currently have to have a handler check every incoming request
> for failure, and then convert with Unicode::String ....
It'll likely go into the next libapreq-1.X release, and be
carried on to 2.X versions as well. 1.1 is now on its
way to becoming official (I don't know if it'll ever
appear on CPAN though), so there's nothing holding up further
progress on httpd-apreq.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: Re[2]: ap_unescape_url can't escape %uXXXX
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Lee Goddard <ho...@LeeGoddard.com> writes:
> Any idea if/when that'll be incorporated to the distributions?
>
> I currently have to have a handler check every incoming request
> for failure, and then convert with Unicode::String ....
It'll likely go into the next libapreq-1.X release, and be
carried on to 2.X versions as well. 1.1 is now on its
way to becoming official (I don't know if it'll ever
appear on CPAN though), so there's nothing holding up further
progress on httpd-apreq.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re[2]: ap_unescape_url can't escape %uXXXX
Posted by Lee Goddard <ho...@LeeGoddard.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: MD5
Hi IKEBE,
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 at 1:32:43 PM, you wrote:
IT> I have written a little patch for libapreq which unescape
IT> the %uXXXX style URI-escaped string.
IT> the unescape algorithm is based on CGI.pm
Any idea if/when that'll be incorporated to the distributions?
I currently have to have a handler check every incoming request
for failure, and then convert with Unicode::String ....
- --
Cheers
Lee "Of course, if everyone used Lynx, this wouldn't be a problem"
Goddard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAwUAPjaBYadrfekeF/QBAQHDJgP/YnPgGH8c3emGgbwnuvAB3B2jIvnetcD0
2nyE4ODThKoRuITHRX5qa9FvHtz2ouNM+pgDr0wo6TRyJM7sqmpzXVy/0XYw6NUV
j8nxkBiELC4F9JWyf+a91rzvTOA/eXDPizrOC9/OgKKn+ZH86GftoeNd+KvhM4TG
kRmE6bJ5O+4=
=ZPvi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re[2]: ap_unescape_url can't escape %uXXXX
Posted by Lee Goddard <ho...@LeeGoddard.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: MD5
Hi IKEBE,
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 at 1:32:43 PM, you wrote:
IT> I have written a little patch for libapreq which unescape
IT> the %uXXXX style URI-escaped string.
IT> the unescape algorithm is based on CGI.pm
Any idea if/when that'll be incorporated to the distributions?
I currently have to have a handler check every incoming request
for failure, and then convert with Unicode::String ....
- --
Cheers
Lee "Of course, if everyone used Lynx, this wouldn't be a problem"
Goddard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAwUAPjaBYadrfekeF/QBAQHDJgP/YnPgGH8c3emGgbwnuvAB3B2jIvnetcD0
2nyE4ODThKoRuITHRX5qa9FvHtz2ouNM+pgDr0wo6TRyJM7sqmpzXVy/0XYw6NUV
j8nxkBiELC4F9JWyf+a91rzvTOA/eXDPizrOC9/OgKKn+ZH86GftoeNd+KvhM4TG
kRmE6bJ5O+4=
=ZPvi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----