You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2018/01/30 14:42:46 UTC

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] uimaj-3.0.0 rc2

The uimaj-examples project has classpath dependencies that need updating when
versions of those Jars changes.

The jackson-core jar version (among others) changed, but the version wasn't
updated in the uimaj-examples project.

-Marshall


On 1/29/2018 4:49 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is rc2 of 3.0.0 uimaj.  Changes since rc1 were to fix the issues Richard found
>
>   - bug when JCas range is unknown
>   - exception thrown unnecessarily, making Component Descriptor Editor (CDE)
> fail on bad JCas classes
>   - changed CDE to bypass loading user-defined JCas classes.
>
> Changes since the beta are mainly 2 (plus some bug fixes):
>   1) support for serialization / deserialization and subsequent access using
> LowLeveCAS.getFSFromRef(int) API.
>   2) support for applications which have JCas class classes, and load multiple
> type systems (under the same class loader) with some of these having subsets of
> the features.
>
> Also, added 2 more semi-built-in types: one is a variant of the FSHashSet, using
> linked Hash Set, so iterating gives a reasonable order. The other is a general
> map from ints to Feature Structures, intended to let users eventually replace
> use of the LowLevelCAS API method referenced above.
>
> The Jiras for this release are here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310570%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%2012341578%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20key%20ASC
>
> Maven artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1180/
>
> Source and binary zip/tar staged to:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-rc2/artifacts/
>
> Eclipse update subsite:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimaj/3.0.0-rc2/uimaj-uv3
>
> SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>