You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Kevin Williams <kj...@gmail.com> on 2007/04/26 23:01:54 UTC

ComponentTestCase vs. CompositeTestCase

I am looking at the tests in itest/spec-api and wonder why there is a
ComponentTestCase as well as a CompositeTestCase.  It looks like
CompositeTestCase is just a subset of ComponentTestCase.  Am I missing
something?

Thanks,
--Kevin

Re: ComponentTestCase vs. CompositeTestCase

Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.

Kevin Williams wrote:
> I am looking at the tests in itest/spec-api and wonder why there is a
> ComponentTestCase as well as a CompositeTestCase.  It looks like
> CompositeTestCase is just a subset of ComponentTestCase.  Am I missing
> something?
>
> Thanks,
> --Kevin
>

Kevin,

If I understand these tests correctly, CompositeTestCase is similar to 
ComponentTestCase except that it uses a nested composite. We could 
probably move some of the test logic to a common class reused by these 
two test cases.

-- 
Jean-Sebastien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org