You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by we...@tigris.org on 2009/04/20 14:38:02 UTC
RE: Re: format of .svn/entries file for svn 1.4.3
> On 3/26/07, Sotiris Demetriades <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > can anyone please describe the format of of .svn/entries file for svn
> > 1.4.3? I searched the web but I didn't find anything about the format
> > of the .svn/entries file for 1.4
>
> It is and will stay unspecified for your own protection: you're not to
> meddle with the contents of the .svn area! It may damage your data!
>
> bye,
>
> Erik.
This is as good a place as any to decry the fact that svn ls is unreliable. In the case of files added and removed, at least, "svn ls" gives the wrong answer. I have been unsuccessful in forcing a "sync" so that I can immediately process managed files. This is one vital reason for knowing the format of the entries file.
And one vital reason for needing a reliable "svn ls" command is because svn tags are unreliable. So, I use find(1) to create my own tag files.
Or perhaps I don't understand the much acclaimed "single revision number" concept of SVN. How do I capture the state of a directory that's possibly had arbitrary single-file updates and commits in it?
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1825771
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].
RE: Re: format of .svn/entries file for svn 1.4.3
Posted by ol...@thomsonreuters.com.
< In the case of files added and removed, at least, "svn ls" gives the
wrong answer. >
Could you specify your actions and commands and what's wrong does SVN
give?
Best Regards,
Olga Soika Olga.Soika@thomsonreuters.com
RR Build Team RRBuildTeam@reuters.com
-----Original Message-----
From: webpost@tigris.org [mailto:webpost@tigris.org]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:38 AM
To: users@subversion.tigris.org; Erik Huelsmann
Subject: RE: Re: format of .svn/entries file for svn 1.4.3
> On 3/26/07, Sotiris Demetriades <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > can anyone please describe the format of of .svn/entries file for
svn
> > 1.4.3? I searched the web but I didn't find anything about the
format
> > of the .svn/entries file for 1.4
>
> It is and will stay unspecified for your own protection: you're not to
> meddle with the contents of the .svn area! It may damage your data!
>
> bye,
>
> Erik.
This is as good a place as any to decry the fact that svn ls is
unreliable. In the case of files added and removed, at least, "svn ls"
gives the wrong answer. I have been unsuccessful in forcing a "sync" so
that I can immediately process managed files. This is one vital reason
for knowing the format of the entries file.
And one vital reason for needing a reliable "svn ls" command is because
svn tags are unreliable. So, I use find(1) to create my own tag files.
Or perhaps I don't understand the much acclaimed "single revision
number" concept of SVN. How do I capture the state of a directory
that's possibly had arbitrary single-file updates and commits in it?
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageI
d=1825771
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].
This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1825969
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].