You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Zhihong Yu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/05/01 22:20:54 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5898) Consider double-checked locking for
block cache lock
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Zhihong Yu updated HBASE-5898:
------------------------------
Attachment: 5898-TestBlocksRead.txt
Some changes to TestBlocksRead are needed to make it pass.
See if the increase in blocks read is acceptable.
> Consider double-checked locking for block cache lock
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5898
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: performance
> Affects Versions: 0.94.1
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Attachments: 5898-TestBlocksRead.txt, hbase-5898.txt
>
>
> Running a workload with a high query rate against a dataset that fits in cache, I saw a lot of CPU being used in IdLock.getLockEntry, being called by HFileReaderV2.readBlock. Even though it was all cache hits, it was wasting a lot of CPU doing lock management here. I wrote a quick patch to switch to a double-checked locking and it improved throughput substantially for this workload.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira