You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/01 14:17:33 UTC
Re: SSL Support in CMS?
In activemq, have no way to build a stomp client using ssl connection?
Have you any activemq clients using ssl examples?
thank you
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:28 -0400, Timothy Bish wrote:
> Stomp provides an interoperable wire format so that any of the available
> Stomp Clients can communicate with any Stomp Message Broker to provide
> easy and widespread messaging interop among languages, platforms and
> brokers. Stomp does not have inherent support for the transport, ie.
> TCP, UDP, SSL, etc.
>
> So no, you can't use the stomp wireformat support in ActiveMQ-CPP to
> communicate over SSL.
>
> Regards
> Tim.
>
> mrh wrote:
> > The truth is, I don't know much about Stomp at all, but I thought I read
> > somewhere that as a protocol it supported SSL? I could very well be making
> > that up though, lol. But if it does, I wondered if might be possible to
> > specify stomp as the protocol and use it to make an SSL connection. I
> > apologize in advance for my ignorance of the library... still trying to
> > understand everything.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > mrh
> >
> >
> > Tim Bish wrote:
> >
> >> No definite time line at the moment. I'm not sure how stomp could be an
> >> alternative to SSL could you elaborate?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: SSL Support in CMS?
Posted by Nathan Mittler <na...@gmail.com>.
I personally don't know much about the ruby client (
http://stomp.codehaus.org/Ruby+Client). You might want to post your
question to the stomp forum (http://stomp.codehaus.org/Mailing+Lists).
Regards,
Nate
On 11/1/07, Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Nate
>
> Do you have any example in SSL/STOMP/Ruby ?
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your time.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 09:36 -0400, Nathan Mittler wrote:
> > Our discussion has been specifically about the C++ client, ActiveMQ-CPP.
> > The wire format (OpenWire, Stomp) is a layer on top of the transport
> (tcp).
> > It is done this way so that you can use any wire format with any
> transport.
> > ActiveMQ-CPP does not yet support an SSL transport, therefore it is
> > unavailable for use with any wire format.
> >
> > If you're using Java, you certainly can use SSL with Stomp or
> OpenWire. See
> > http://activemq.apache.org/ssl-transport-reference.html.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nate
> >
> > On 11/1/07, Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In activemq, have no way to build a stomp client using ssl connection?
> > >
> > > Have you any activemq clients using ssl examples?
> > >
> > > thank you
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:28 -0400, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > > > Stomp provides an interoperable wire format so that any of the
> available
> > > > Stomp Clients can communicate with any Stomp Message Broker to
> provide
> > > > easy and widespread messaging interop among languages, platforms and
> > > > brokers. Stomp does not have inherent support for the transport,
> ie.
> > > > TCP, UDP, SSL, etc.
> > > >
> > > > So no, you can't use the stomp wireformat support in ActiveMQ-CPP to
> > > > communicate over SSL.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Tim.
> > > >
> > > > mrh wrote:
> > > > > The truth is, I don't know much about Stomp at all, but I thought
> I
> > > read
> > > > > somewhere that as a protocol it supported SSL? I could very well
> be
> > > making
> > > > > that up though, lol. But if it does, I wondered if might be
> possible
> > > to
> > > > > specify stomp as the protocol and use it to make an SSL
> connection. I
> > > > > apologize in advance for my ignorance of the library... still
> trying
> > > to
> > > > > understand everything.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks again,
> > > > > mrh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim Bish wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> No definite time line at the moment. I'm not sure how stomp
> could be
> > > an
> > > > >> alternative to SSL could you elaborate?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
Re: SSL Support in CMS?
Posted by Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com>.
Thank you, Nate
Do you have any example in SSL/STOMP/Ruby ?
Thanks a lot for your time.
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 09:36 -0400, Nathan Mittler wrote:
> Our discussion has been specifically about the C++ client, ActiveMQ-CPP.
> The wire format (OpenWire, Stomp) is a layer on top of the transport (tcp).
> It is done this way so that you can use any wire format with any transport.
> ActiveMQ-CPP does not yet support an SSL transport, therefore it is
> unavailable for use with any wire format.
>
> If you're using Java, you certainly can use SSL with Stomp or OpenWire. See
> http://activemq.apache.org/ssl-transport-reference.html.
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
> On 11/1/07, Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In activemq, have no way to build a stomp client using ssl connection?
> >
> > Have you any activemq clients using ssl examples?
> >
> > thank you
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:28 -0400, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > > Stomp provides an interoperable wire format so that any of the available
> > > Stomp Clients can communicate with any Stomp Message Broker to provide
> > > easy and widespread messaging interop among languages, platforms and
> > > brokers. Stomp does not have inherent support for the transport, ie.
> > > TCP, UDP, SSL, etc.
> > >
> > > So no, you can't use the stomp wireformat support in ActiveMQ-CPP to
> > > communicate over SSL.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Tim.
> > >
> > > mrh wrote:
> > > > The truth is, I don't know much about Stomp at all, but I thought I
> > read
> > > > somewhere that as a protocol it supported SSL? I could very well be
> > making
> > > > that up though, lol. But if it does, I wondered if might be possible
> > to
> > > > specify stomp as the protocol and use it to make an SSL connection. I
> > > > apologize in advance for my ignorance of the library... still trying
> > to
> > > > understand everything.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again,
> > > > mrh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tim Bish wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> No definite time line at the moment. I'm not sure how stomp could be
> > an
> > > >> alternative to SSL could you elaborate?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
Re: SSL Support in CMS?
Posted by Nathan Mittler <na...@gmail.com>.
Our discussion has been specifically about the C++ client, ActiveMQ-CPP.
The wire format (OpenWire, Stomp) is a layer on top of the transport (tcp).
It is done this way so that you can use any wire format with any transport.
ActiveMQ-CPP does not yet support an SSL transport, therefore it is
unavailable for use with any wire format.
If you're using Java, you certainly can use SSL with Stomp or OpenWire. See
http://activemq.apache.org/ssl-transport-reference.html.
Regards,
Nate
On 11/1/07, Marcos Alvares <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In activemq, have no way to build a stomp client using ssl connection?
>
> Have you any activemq clients using ssl examples?
>
> thank you
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:28 -0400, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > Stomp provides an interoperable wire format so that any of the available
> > Stomp Clients can communicate with any Stomp Message Broker to provide
> > easy and widespread messaging interop among languages, platforms and
> > brokers. Stomp does not have inherent support for the transport, ie.
> > TCP, UDP, SSL, etc.
> >
> > So no, you can't use the stomp wireformat support in ActiveMQ-CPP to
> > communicate over SSL.
> >
> > Regards
> > Tim.
> >
> > mrh wrote:
> > > The truth is, I don't know much about Stomp at all, but I thought I
> read
> > > somewhere that as a protocol it supported SSL? I could very well be
> making
> > > that up though, lol. But if it does, I wondered if might be possible
> to
> > > specify stomp as the protocol and use it to make an SSL connection. I
> > > apologize in advance for my ignorance of the library... still trying
> to
> > > understand everything.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > > mrh
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim Bish wrote:
> > >
> > >> No definite time line at the moment. I'm not sure how stomp could be
> an
> > >> alternative to SSL could you elaborate?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>