You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org> on 2011/04/01 15:34:24 UTC
Logo
I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever decided on
a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
-Matt
Re: Logo
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 04/07/2011 01:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 11:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>>>> have
>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>
>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>
>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>
>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>
>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>> too).
>>
>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
>> and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>
> Although he might want to wait until we've seen Marlons offerings. There may be
> something we like even more in there ;-)
I already told him :)
(he's sitting across the table here)
>
> Ross
Re: Logo
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 07/04/2011 11:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>>> have
>>> the last one on this list.
>>
>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>
>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>
>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>
>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>> too).
>
> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
> and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
Although he might want to wait until we've seen Marlons offerings. There
may be something we like even more in there ;-)
Ross
Re: Logo
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Of the smaller logos, I prefer simplestyle2.jpg. The font choice credit
goes to Barbara Hallock.
Marlon
On 4/13/11 11:51 AM, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created new logo designs. I started merging the white label / record label
> ideas of Scott, Marlon and myself. Some notes:
>
> - I like the font Marlon uses, especially the "A" style. It makes the word
> "RAVE" look really distinctive. So I used a similar but slightly heavier
> font with a more symmetrical cross-bar and adjusted the kerning to give it
> more body and balance.
> - I agree with Hadrians "simplicity is good" statement. So I removed a lot
> of elements from the concept2.
>
> This resulted in:
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg
>
> Doing this I realized the symmetry of the "A" and the "V" is a truly strong
> style element, and combined it with the 'hole' of the label. I also thought
> the 'appstyle' logo still looks too iconic. It needs to be even simpler IMO.
> Therefore I've created two variants of a more abstract logo, still based on
> the white label idea (and using a black/white color scheme to emphasize
> that). Here they are:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
>
> Like to hear your comments.
>
> Rolf
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>> have
>>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>>
>>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>>
>>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>>
>>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>>
>>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>>> too).
>>>
>>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or
>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>>
>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>>
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ate
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
> like
> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
> restart the logo contest?
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>>>>>> decided on
>>>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed
>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
>>> Anyone
>>>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to
>>> see
>>>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>>>>>> accurate
>>>>>>>> to a white label).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
>>> the
>>>>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNpc5fAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5iIIH/22DEVyPp9+CQRjFjKBI+GSB
8m68GW8Pm45RMDkcPtOV+Sz3liKcZ5clk8VdKI+QDLgElI2H1378kGgjWq0RwFL9
z0oopvtbtdm7+sNym6U7ds5qGPxGIPydGJFTTcFo0w9lZvYNzVquCpfjmE1xBNqk
PEoaf+FmV93wJxIqKbm8cF0oumXG6k7T6VuoNY+KAajFy12HlqVSGt3zu04uns7T
HBHXX5PC1VOVFrLKPePIj2SIlJYqMLCD1vKgJ+JXCOQu0jyRcIAC0r5t/59OdVpx
2vKYpVIYpRD2p1+8VLLBuk0NKLftiDhxaE3LkQ8MLL/ogeBCDISAoaOUYyO0uus=
=DpkK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Logo
Posted by Niels van Dijk <ni...@surfnet.nl>.
Both logos are fine with me.
Cheers,
Niels
On 04/14/2011 02:54 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
> + 1 for the simple style 1
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
> + 0 fpr the simple style 2.
>
> Nice creativity!!
>
> Suresh
>
>>
>> Like to hear your comments.
>>
>> Rolf
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson
<scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>>> have
>>>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>>>
>>>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI
designer):
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>>>
>>>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>>>> too).
>>>>
>>>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
and/or
>>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>>>
>>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ate
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>
> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
> like
> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
> restart the logo contest?
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
> >>>>>>>>> decided on
> >>>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and
> committed
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
> >>> Anyone
> >>>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd
> like to
> >>> see
> >>>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand
> written
> >>>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
> >>>>>>>> accurate
> >>>>>>>> to a white label).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the
> label and
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *HIPPO*
>> Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
>> USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
>> 617 500 6160
>> USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
>> +1 877 414 4776
>> www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
>>
>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>> waive any related rights and obligations.
>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@cs.indiana.edu>.
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
+ 1 for the simple style 1
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
+ 0 fpr the simple style 2.
Nice creativity!!
Suresh
>
> Like to hear your comments.
>
> Rolf
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>> have
>>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>>
>>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>>
>>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>>
>>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>>
>>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>>> too).
>>>
>>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or
>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>>
>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>>
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ate
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>>>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>>>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>>>>>> restart the logo contest?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marlon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>>>>> decided on
>>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed
>> to
>>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
>> Anyone
>>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to
>> see
>>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>>>>> accurate
>>>>>>> to a white label).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
>> the
>>>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>>>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>>>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>>>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>>>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>>>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>>>>>> =Ehw/
>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *HIPPO*
> Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
> USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
> 617 500 6160
> USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
> +1 877 414 4776
> www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
>
> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
> waive any related rights and obligations.
> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
> contains by other than an intended recipient is
> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Rolf van der Steen <r....@1hippo.com>.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>
>>
>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>> sleek.
>>
>
> +1 I really like - great impact.
>
> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without
> the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>
It does, i've been playing around with that idea too. For a logo -
especially in web-enviroments - the square format doesn't work that well (to
display it at a readable size it uses a lot of vertical space in the
header). But if the simplestyle1 is going to be the choosen logo, I'd be
happy to make an accompanying icon variant.
>
> Great stuff!
>
> Ross
>
--
*HIPPO*
Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
617 500 6160
USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
+1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Maarten Kremers <ma...@surfnet.nl>.
On 14-04-11 10:43, Unico Hommes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Le 13/04/11 18:02, Ross Gardler a écrit :
>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>> sleek.
>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>> +1, really nice
> +1 great logo
>
> --
> Unico
Also +1 for simple style 1. Looks great!
Regards,
Maarten
Re: Logo
Posted by Unico Hommes <u....@onehippo.com>.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 13/04/11 18:02, Ross Gardler a écrit :
>>
>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>
>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>> sleek.
>>
>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>
> +1, really nice
+1 great logo
--
Unico
Re: Logo
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Le 13/04/11 18:02, Ross Gardler a écrit :
> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>
>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>> sleek.
>
> +1 I really like - great impact.
+1, really nice
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
Re: Logo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Using the feather as the needle? Very creative. I like the idea :).
Hadrian
On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Sander van der Waal wrote:
> Very cool, I really really like the new set Rolf came up with!
>
> I've been playing around with one of the previous versions. It's NOT
> intended for the
> logo beauty contest, because it's not near the quality of Rolf's work, but I
> thought
> I'd upload it anyway:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~svanderwaal/rave_graphic.png
>
> I tried to add some depth to it and make it a little bit more like a record,
> with
> the Apache feather as the 'needle on the record'.
>
> Sander
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Yes to voting next week. They all look very good to me.
>>
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 4/15/11 9:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>> Goodness, I am speechless.
>>>
>>> +1 to *all* of them.
>>> +1 to Ross' proposal to call a vote next week (if no other feedback).
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
>>>>> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
>>>>> I've created a Jira issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
>>>>
>>>> Fantastic!
>>>>
>>>> I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back
>> with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party.
>>>>
>>>> All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on
>> the list.
>>>>
>>>> I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote
>> for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a
>> couple of days for more feedback)
>>>>
>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<jcian@mitre.org
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rolf,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't
>> see
>>>>>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on
>> the web
>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Jesse
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
>>>>>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Logo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>> Thnx for the positive feedback!
>>>>>> I did some more work. Here's an update.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file
>> which
>>>>>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
>>>>>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
>>>>>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy.
>> I
>>>>>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
>>>>>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
>>>>>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of
>> reluctant
>>>>>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark
>> grey),
>>>>>> but the red actually works really well.
>>>>>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based
>> on
>>>>>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and
>> "inside"
>>>>>> variations of the logo.
>>>>>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful,
>> so I
>>>>>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These
>> can
>>>>>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
>>>>>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
>>>>>> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
>>>>>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> grt, Rolf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com
>>>>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> Ate,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although
>> it's
>>>>>> not technically a vote). So there:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to both of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
>>>>>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue
>> that as
>>>>>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe
>> enhancing the
>>>>>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome
>> (pun
>>>>>> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2
>> for
>>>>>> not being as solid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these
>> two is
>>>>>> chosen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great work,
>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you.
>> Very
>>>>>>>>>> sleek.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg>
>> but
>>>>>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the
>> record.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great stuff!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> HIPPO
>>>>>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20
>> 522
>>>>>> 4466
>>>>>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 *
>> +1
>>>>>> 617 500 6160
>>>>>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA
>> 94954 *
>>>>>> +1 877 414 4776
>>>>>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
>>>>>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<mailto:
>> info@onehippo.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
>> not
>>>>>> waive any related rights and obligations.
>>>>>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>>>>>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
>>>>>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me
>> (by
>>>>>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> rgardler@apache.org
>>>> @rgardler
>>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNqEoDAAoJEOEgD2XReDo50uAIAMMAotwKj/k4vezJqXBRiw/g
>> KcB5AJMHwNJcyiBQ7jNN6h5Yh77Kk8TMV/m+dBA+L4Diwl/Kg7gZrctctv47bWjm
>> NIw23GWhRHTiy3mnA2cdsQwhPgzMUgaTiydYwajYp/pL2P29Jg2i8srgIGMPWFkh
>> dDqy8OfFTLvdna+bJPTZDw34/FZ0AYjX+4xP8jcSvrZZ8pUzpjNbKK0Zz1dlimDO
>> dgQ4ueotcBxl7JUZiJ/4wivZBfCJCyJ307n9dfAR5t0qVogV+uLiDJm5mcfn+1RA
>> VlUuXyXMpoCLg1ug03PTS/dJ18vWYhUPaNVwdglp2Udp7t84BR/O25p/OVmACH0=
>> =4jZ8
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
Re: Logo
Posted by Sander van der Waal <sa...@gmail.com>.
Very cool, I really really like the new set Rolf came up with!
I've been playing around with one of the previous versions. It's NOT
intended for the
logo beauty contest, because it's not near the quality of Rolf's work, but I
thought
I'd upload it anyway:
http://people.apache.org/~svanderwaal/rave_graphic.png
I tried to add some depth to it and make it a little bit more like a record,
with
the Apache feather as the 'needle on the record'.
Sander
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes to voting next week. They all look very good to me.
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 4/15/11 9:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> > Goodness, I am speechless.
> >
> > +1 to *all* of them.
> > +1 to Ross' proposal to call a vote next week (if no other feedback).
> >
> > Hadrian
> >
> >
> > On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
> >>> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
> >>> I've created a Jira issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
> >>
> >> Fantastic!
> >>
> >> I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back
> with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party.
> >>
> >> All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on
> the list.
> >>
> >> I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote
> for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a
> couple of days for more feedback)
> >>
> >> Ross
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<jcian@mitre.org
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Rolf,
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't
> see
> >>>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on
> the web
> >>>> somewhere?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --Jesse
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
> >>>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Logo
> >>>>
> >>>> All,
> >>>> Thnx for the positive feedback!
> >>>> I did some more work. Here's an update.
> >>>>
> >>>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file
> which
> >>>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
> >>>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
> >>>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy.
> I
> >>>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
> >>>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
> >>>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of
> reluctant
> >>>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark
> grey),
> >>>> but the red actually works really well.
> >>>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based
> on
> >>>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and
> "inside"
> >>>> variations of the logo.
> >>>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful,
> so I
> >>>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These
> can
> >>>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
> >>>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
> >>>> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
> >>>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
> >>>>
> >>>> grt, Rolf
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com
> >>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>> Ate,
> >>>>
> >>>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although
> it's
> >>>> not technically a vote). So there:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 to both of them.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
> >>>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue
> that as
> >>>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe
> enhancing the
> >>>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome
> (pun
> >>>> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hadrian
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >>>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2
> for
> >>>> not being as solid.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these
> two is
> >>>> chosen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Great work,
> >>>>>> Hadrian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you.
> Very
> >>>>>>>> sleek.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg>
> but
> >>>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the
> record.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Great stuff!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ross
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> HIPPO
> >>>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20
> 522
> >>>> 4466
> >>>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 *
> +1
> >>>> 617 500 6160
> >>>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA
> 94954 *
> >>>> +1 877 414 4776
> >>>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
> >>>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<mailto:
> info@onehippo.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
> not
> >>>> waive any related rights and obligations.
> >>>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
> >>>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
> >>>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me
> (by
> >>>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> rgardler@apache.org
> >> @rgardler
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNqEoDAAoJEOEgD2XReDo50uAIAMMAotwKj/k4vezJqXBRiw/g
> KcB5AJMHwNJcyiBQ7jNN6h5Yh77Kk8TMV/m+dBA+L4Diwl/Kg7gZrctctv47bWjm
> NIw23GWhRHTiy3mnA2cdsQwhPgzMUgaTiydYwajYp/pL2P29Jg2i8srgIGMPWFkh
> dDqy8OfFTLvdna+bJPTZDw34/FZ0AYjX+4xP8jcSvrZZ8pUzpjNbKK0Zz1dlimDO
> dgQ4ueotcBxl7JUZiJ/4wivZBfCJCyJ307n9dfAR5t0qVogV+uLiDJm5mcfn+1RA
> VlUuXyXMpoCLg1ug03PTS/dJ18vWYhUPaNVwdglp2Udp7t84BR/O25p/OVmACH0=
> =4jZ8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yes to voting next week. They all look very good to me.
Marlon
On 4/15/11 9:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Goodness, I am speechless.
>
> +1 to *all* of them.
> +1 to Ross' proposal to call a vote next week (if no other feedback).
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
>>> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
>>> I've created a Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
>>
>> Fantastic!
>>
>> I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party.
>>
>> All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on the list.
>>
>> I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a couple of days for more feedback)
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<jc...@mitre.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rolf,
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't see
>>>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on the web
>>>> somewhere?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> --Jesse
>>>>
>>>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
>>>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Logo
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>> Thnx for the positive feedback!
>>>> I did some more work. Here's an update.
>>>>
>>>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
>>>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
>>>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
>>>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I
>>>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
>>>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
>>>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
>>>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
>>>> but the red actually works really well.
>>>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
>>>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
>>>> variations of the logo.
>>>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
>>>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
>>>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
>>>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
>>>> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
>>>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> grt, Rolf
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com
>>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> Ate,
>>>>
>>>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
>>>> not technically a vote). So there:
>>>>
>>>> +1 to both of them.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
>>>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
>>>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
>>>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
>>>> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
>>>> not being as solid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
>>>> chosen.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great work,
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
>>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>>>>>> sleek.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
>>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> but
>>>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great stuff!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> HIPPO
>>>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 522
>>>> 4466
>>>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * +1
>>>> 617 500 6160
>>>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA 94954 *
>>>> +1 877 414 4776
>>>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
>>>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<ma...@onehippo.com>
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>>>> waive any related rights and obligations.
>>>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>>>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
>>>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>>>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> rgardler@apache.org
>> @rgardler
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNqEoDAAoJEOEgD2XReDo50uAIAMMAotwKj/k4vezJqXBRiw/g
KcB5AJMHwNJcyiBQ7jNN6h5Yh77Kk8TMV/m+dBA+L4Diwl/Kg7gZrctctv47bWjm
NIw23GWhRHTiy3mnA2cdsQwhPgzMUgaTiydYwajYp/pL2P29Jg2i8srgIGMPWFkh
dDqy8OfFTLvdna+bJPTZDw34/FZ0AYjX+4xP8jcSvrZZ8pUzpjNbKK0Zz1dlimDO
dgQ4ueotcBxl7JUZiJ/4wivZBfCJCyJ307n9dfAR5t0qVogV+uLiDJm5mcfn+1RA
VlUuXyXMpoCLg1ug03PTS/dJ18vWYhUPaNVwdglp2Udp7t84BR/O25p/OVmACH0=
=4jZ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Logo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Goodness, I am speechless.
+1 to *all* of them.
+1 to Ross' proposal to call a vote next week (if no other feedback).
Hadrian
On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
>> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
>> I've created a Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
>
> Fantastic!
>
> I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party.
>
> All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on the list.
>
> I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a couple of days for more feedback)
>
> Ross
>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<jc...@mitre.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rolf,
>>>
>>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't see
>>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on the web
>>> somewhere?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> --Jesse
>>>
>>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
>>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Logo
>>>
>>> All,
>>> Thnx for the positive feedback!
>>> I did some more work. Here's an update.
>>>
>>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
>>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
>>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
>>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I
>>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
>>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
>>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
>>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
>>> but the red actually works really well.
>>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
>>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
>>> variations of the logo.
>>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
>>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
>>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
>>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
>>> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
>>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
>>>
>>> grt, Rolf
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com
>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Ate,
>>>
>>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
>>> not technically a vote). So there:
>>>
>>> +1 to both of them.
>>>
>>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
>>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
>>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
>>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
>>> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
>>> not being as solid.
>>>>
>>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
>>> chosen.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Great work,
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>>>>> sleek.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> but
>>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great stuff!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> HIPPO
>>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 522
>>> 4466
>>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * +1
>>> 617 500 6160
>>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA 94954 *
>>> +1 877 414 4776
>>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
>>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<ma...@onehippo.com>
>>>
>>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>>> waive any related rights and obligations.
>>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
>>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> rgardler@apache.org
> @rgardler
Re: Logo
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote:
> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
> I've created a Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
Fantastic!
I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back
with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party.
All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on
the list.
I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote
for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a
couple of days for more feedback)
Ross
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<jc...@mitre.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Rolf,
>>
>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't see
>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on the web
>> somewhere?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --Jesse
>>
>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Logo
>>
>> All,
>> Thnx for the positive feedback!
>> I did some more work. Here's an update.
>>
>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I
>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
>> but the red actually works really well.
>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
>> variations of the logo.
>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
>> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
>>
>> grt, Rolf
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<hzbarcea@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Ate,
>>
>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
>> not technically a vote). So there:
>>
>> +1 to both of them.
>>
>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
>> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
>> not being as solid.
>>>
>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
>> chosen.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great work,
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>>>> sleek.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> but
>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>>>>
>>>>> Great stuff!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> HIPPO
>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 522
>> 4466
>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * +1
>> 617 500 6160
>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA 94954 *
>> +1 877 414 4776
>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<ma...@onehippo.com>
>>
>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>> waive any related rights and obligations.
>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>> contains by other than an intended recipient is
>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>>
>>
>
>
--
rgardler@apache.org
@rgardler
Re: Logo
Posted by Rolf van der Steen <r....@1hippo.com>.
Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list.
I've created a Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E. <jc...@mitre.org>wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't see
> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on the web
> somewhere?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Jesse
>
> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Logo
>
> All,
> Thnx for the positive feedback!
> I did some more work. Here's an update.
>
> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a
> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I
> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the
> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
> but the red actually works really well.
> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
> variations of the logo.
> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
> I've attached an image containing all the variations.
> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
>
> grt, Rolf
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Ate,
>
> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
> not technically a vote). So there:
>
> +1 to both of them.
>
> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> > On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
> not being as solid.
> >
> > Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
> chosen.
> >
> >>
> >> Great work,
> >> Hadrian
> >>
> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
> >>>>
> >>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
> >>>> sleek.
> >>>
> >>> +1 I really like - great impact.
> >>>
> >>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> but
> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
> >>>
> >>> Great stuff!
> >>>
> >>> Ross
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> HIPPO
> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 522
> 4466
> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * +1
> 617 500 6160
> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA 94954 *
> +1 877 414 4776
> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<
> http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<ma...@onehippo.com>
>
> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
> waive any related rights and obligations.
> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
> contains by other than an intended recipient is
> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>
>
--
*HIPPO*
Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
617 500 6160
USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
+1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
RE: Logo
Posted by "Ciancetta, Jesse E." <jc...@mitre.org>.
Hi Rolf,
I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't see anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on the web somewhere?
Thanks!
--Jesse
From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:r.vandersteen@1hippo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM
To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Logo
All,
Thnx for the positive feedback!
I did some more work. Here's an update.
* First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
* Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
* I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey), but the red actually works really well.
* I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside" variations of the logo.
* I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
* Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
I've attached an image containing all the variations.
IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
grt, Rolf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ate,
That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's not technically a vote). So there:
+1 to both of them.
I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun intended) logo, simple and powerful.
Hadrian
On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for not being as solid.
>
> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is chosen.
>
>>
>> Great work,
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg<http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg>
>>>>
>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>> sleek.
>>>
>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>
>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg<http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> but without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>>
>>> Great stuff!
>>>
>>> Ross
>>
>
--
HIPPO
Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 522 4466
USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * +1 617 500 6160
USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA 94954 * +1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org<http://www.onehippo.org/> * info@onehippo.com<ma...@onehippo.com>
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Rolf van der Steen <r....@1hippo.com>.
All,
Thnx for the positive feedback!
I did some more work. Here's an update.
- First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
- Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a preference
for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I agree; the
side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the side-elements as an
'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
- I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
but the red actually works really well.
- I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
that I included the "™" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
variations of the logo.
- I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
- Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).
I've attached an image containing all the variations.
IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.
grt, Rolf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ate,
>
> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
> not technically a vote). So there:
>
> +1 to both of them.
>
> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> > On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
> not being as solid.
> >
> > Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
> chosen.
> >
> >>
> >> Great work,
> >> Hadrian
> >>
> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
> >>>>
> >>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
> >>>> sleek.
> >>>
> >>> +1 I really like - great impact.
> >>>
> >>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without
> the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
> >>>
> >>> Great stuff!
> >>>
> >>> Ross
> >>
> >
>
>
--
*HIPPO*
Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
617 500 6160
USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
+1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Ate,
That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's not technically a vote). So there:
+1 to both of them.
I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun intended) logo, simple and powerful.
Hadrian
On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for not being as solid.
>
> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is chosen.
>
>>
>> Great work,
>> Hadrian
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>>
>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>>> sleek.
>>>
>>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>>
>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>>
>>> Great stuff!
>>>
>>> Ross
>>
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for not being as solid.
Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is chosen.
>
> Great work,
> Hadrian
>
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>
>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>> sleek.
>>
>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>>
>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>
>> Great stuff!
>>
>> Ross
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for not being as solid.
Great work,
Hadrian
On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>
>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>> sleek.
>
> +1 I really like - great impact.
>
> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>
> Great stuff!
>
> Ross
Re: Logo
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
On 13 Apr 2011, at 18:24, Ciancetta, Jesse E. wrote:
>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>>
>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>>> sleek.
>>
>> +1 I really like - great impact.
>
> +1 from me on this one too.
>
> I had a thought though when I saw it -- I was wondering if it might be cool to have an outward facing speaker on either side of the logo pounding out some sound waves in the spirit of what I'd imagine a Rave to be like (since I've never actually been to one).
+1 from me too, this is a really nice logo.
(Now... can you design one for Apache Wookie too? ;-)
>
>>
>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but
>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>>
>> Great stuff!
>>
>> Ross
RE: Logo
Posted by "Ciancetta, Jesse E." <jc...@mitre.org>.
>On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>
>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>> sleek.
>
>+1 I really like - great impact.
+1 from me on this one too.
I had a thought though when I saw it -- I was wondering if it might be cool to have an outward facing speaker on either side of the logo pounding out some sound waves in the spirit of what I'd imagine a Rave to be like (since I've never actually been to one).
>
>I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but
>without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>
>Great stuff!
>
>Ross
RE: Logo
Posted by "Carlucci, Tony" <ac...@mitre.org>.
+1 simplestyle1
---
Anthony Carlucci | SW App Dev Eng, Sr. | R501 / KW App Development & Maint
e: acarlucci@mitre.org | v: 781.271.2432 | f: 781.271.3299
The MITRE Corporation | 202 Burlington Rd | Bedford, MA 01730-1420
-----Original Message-----
From: Ciancetta, Jesse E. [mailto:jcian@mitre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:24 PM
To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Logo
>On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>>
>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
>> sleek.
>
>+1 I really like - great impact.
+1 from me on this one too.
I had a thought though when I saw it -- I was wondering if it might be cool to have an outward facing speaker on either side of the logo pounding out some sound waves in the spirit of what I'd imagine a Rave to be like (since I've never actually been to one).
>
>I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but
>without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
>
>Great stuff!
>
>Ross
Re: Logo
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
>
> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
> sleek.
+1 I really like - great impact.
I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but
without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
Great stuff!
Ross
Re: Logo
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
On 4/13/11 11:51 AM, "Rolf van der Steen" <r....@1hippo.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I created new logo designs. I started merging the white label / record
>label
>ideas of Scott, Marlon and myself. Some notes:
>
>- I like the font Marlon uses, especially the "A" style. It makes the word
>"RAVE" look really distinctive. So I used a similar but slightly heavier
>font with a more symmetrical cross-bar and adjusted the kerning to give it
>more body and balance.
>- I agree with Hadrians "simplicity is good" statement. So I removed a lot
>of elements from the concept2.
>
>This resulted in:
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg
>
>Doing this I realized the symmetry of the "A" and the "V" is a truly
>strong
>style element, and combined it with the 'hole' of the label. I also
>thought
>the 'appstyle' logo still looks too iconic. It needs to be even simpler
>IMO.
>Therefore I've created two variants of a more abstract logo, still based
>on
>the white label idea (and using a black/white color scheme to emphasize
>that). Here they are:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very
sleek.
>http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
>
>Like to hear your comments.
>
>Rolf
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson
><scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> > On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>> >> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> >>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>> have
>> >>> the last one on this list.
>> >>
>> >> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>> >>
>> >> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI
>>designer):
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>> >>
>> >> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>> >>
>> >> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>> >> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this
>>list
>> >> too).
>> >
>> > I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
>>and/or
>> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>>
>> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon -
>>nice!
>>
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Ate
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Matt
>> >>>
>> >>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >>>> Hash: SHA1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it
>>looks
>> >>>> like
>> >>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree
>>with
>> >>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to
>>go
>> >>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>> >>>> restart the logo contest?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Marlon
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> >>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> >>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>> >>>>>> decided on
>> >>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and
>>committed
>> to
>> >>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
>> Anyone
>> >>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like
>>to
>> see
>> >>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand
>>written
>> >>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>> >>>>> accurate
>> >>>>> to a white label).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
>> the
>> >>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ross
>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>> >>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>> >>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>> >>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>> >>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>> >>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>> >>>> =Ehw/
>> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>*HIPPO*
>Europe € Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 € 1017 WT Amsterdam € +31 20 522
>4466
>USA € Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway € Boston MA 02142 € +1
>617 500 6160
>USA € San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor € Petaluma CA 94954
>€
>+1 877 414 4776
>www.onehippo.com € www.onehippo.org € info@onehippo.com
>
>This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
>waive any related rights and obligations.
>Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
>contains by other than an intended recipient is
>unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
>return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Rolf van der Steen <r....@1hippo.com>.
Hi all,
I created new logo designs. I started merging the white label / record label
ideas of Scott, Marlon and myself. Some notes:
- I like the font Marlon uses, especially the "A" style. It makes the word
"RAVE" look really distinctive. So I used a similar but slightly heavier
font with a more symmetrical cross-bar and adjusted the kerning to give it
more body and balance.
- I agree with Hadrians "simplicity is good" statement. So I removed a lot
of elements from the concept2.
This resulted in:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg
Doing this I realized the symmetry of the "A" and the "V" is a truly strong
style element, and combined it with the 'hole' of the label. I also thought
the 'appstyle' logo still looks too iconic. It needs to be even simpler IMO.
Therefore I've created two variants of a more abstract logo, still based on
the white label idea (and using a black/white color scheme to emphasize
that). Here they are:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle2.jpg
Like to hear your comments.
Rolf
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
> >> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
> have
> >>> the last one on this list.
> >>
> >> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
> >>
> >> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
> >>
> >> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
> >>
> >> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
> >> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
> >> too).
> >
> > I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or
> 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>
> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>
> >
> > Ross
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Ate
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -Matt
> >>>
> >>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
> >>>> like
> >>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
> >>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
> >>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
> >>>> restart the logo contest?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Marlon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
> >>>>>> decided on
> >>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed
> to
> >>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
> Anyone
> >>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to
> see
> >>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
> >>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
> >>>>> accurate
> >>>>> to a white label).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
> the
> >>>>> text were neater (but still script).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ross
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >>>>
> >>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
> >>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
> >>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
> >>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
> >>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
> >>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
> >>>> =Ehw/
> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
*HIPPO*
Europe • Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 20 522 4466
USA • Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway • Boston MA 02142 • +1
617 500 6160
USA • San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor • Petaluma CA 94954 •
+1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info@onehippo.com
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Re: Logo
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
They all look kinda too black for me. Simplicity is good.
My $0.02,
Hadrian
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>
>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>
>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>
>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>
>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>> too).
>>
>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>
> I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ate
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
>>>>> like
>>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>>>>> restart the logo contest?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marlon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>>>> decided on
>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>>>> accurate
>>>>>> to a white label).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
>>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>>>>> =Ehw/
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Logo
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
One of our designers is going to take a crack at a logo for the contest as
well. I will put it out on people as soon as I have it.
-Matt
On 4/7/11 8:18 AM, "Scott Wilson" <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't
>>>>have
>>>> the last one on this list.
>>>
>>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>>
>>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI
>>>designer):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>>
>>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>>
>>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>>> too).
>>
>> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
>>and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
>
>I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ate
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
>>>>> like
>>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>>>>> restart the logo contest?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marlon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>>>> decided on
>>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and
>>>>>>>committed to
>>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website.
>>>>>>>Anyone
>>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to
>>>>>>see
>>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand
>>>>>>written
>>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>>>> accurate
>>>>>> to a white label).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>>>>> =Ehw/
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
>>> the last one on this list.
>>
>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>>
>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>>
>> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>>
>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
>> too).
>
> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice!
>
> Ross
>
>
>>
>> Ate
>>
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
>>>> like
>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>>>> restart the logo contest?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marlon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>>> decided on
>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>>> accurate
>>>>> to a white label).
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
>>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ross
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>>
>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>>>> =Ehw/
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
>> the last one on this list.
>
> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
>
> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
>
> - white label design by Scott Wilson:
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
>
> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
> too).
I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
Ross
>
> Ate
>
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
>>> like
>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>>> restart the logo contest?
>>>
>>>
>>> Marlon
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>>> decided on
>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
>>>> accurate
>>>> to a white label).
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
>>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>>
>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>>
>>>> Ross
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>>
>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>>> =Ehw/
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
Re: Logo
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
> the last one on this list.
I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
- three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
- white label design by Scott Wilson:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list too).
Ate
>
> -Matt
>
> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks like
>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>> restart the logo contest?
>>
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>>
>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>> decided on
>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>>
>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate
>>> to a white label).
>>>
>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
>>> text were neater (but still script).
>>>
>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>>
>>> Ross
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>> =Ehw/
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: Logo
Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
the last one on this list.
-Matt
On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce" <mp...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks like
>the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
>Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
>with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
>restart the logo contest?
>
>
>Marlon
>
>
>On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
>>>decided on
>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>>
>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
>>a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
>>one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate
>>to a white label).
>>
>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
>>text were neater (but still script).
>>
>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>>
>> Ross
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
>YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
>OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
>zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
>am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
>UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
>=Ehw/
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Logo
Posted by Marlon Pierce <mp...@cs.indiana.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks like the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we restart the logo contest?
Marlon
On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever decided on
>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
>
> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate to a white label).
>
> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the text were neater (but still script).
>
> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
>
> Ross
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
=Ehw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Logo
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever decided on
> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate
to a white label).
Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
text were neater (but still script).
I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
Ross