You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/06/26 02:48:50 UTC
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
--------------------------------------------------
Key: OFBIZ-3836
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
Reporter: BJ Freeman
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
Posted by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
------------------------------
Parent: OFBIZ-3825
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
> The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
> I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
> The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
> The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
> The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
> In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
> Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
Posted by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
------------------------------
Parent: OFBIZ-3852
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
> The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
> I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
> The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
> The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
> The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
> In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
> Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
Posted by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
------------------------------
Original Estimate: 168h (was: 0.02h)
Remaining Estimate: 168h (was: 0.02h)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
> The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
> I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
> The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
> The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
> The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
> In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
> Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3836) partybenifits leaves out using
parytyrelationships
Posted by "BJ Freeman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3836:
------------------------------
Parent: (was: OFBIZ-3825)
Issue Type: Bug (was: Sub-task)
> partybenifits leaves out using parytyrelationships
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3836
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: humanres
> Affects Versions: Release Branch 09.04, Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Release Branch 10.04, SVN trunk
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> In data model book the partybenefits use partyrelationship of employment to tie a party and organization to partybenefits. Page 302.
> The entity ties the party directly to the partybenefits.
> I wanted to call this a design bug but figured I spend more time defending that position than an improvement.
> The Agreement of type Employment is also tied to the Party the same way.
> The relationship goes through types from prospective, interviewee, newhire, to employment
> The newhire is usually a 90-day period of probation before benefits are initiated.
> In a way similar to statuschange the relationship if changed. Would have changes that could happen for each relationship, be defined in partyrelationshipchange.
> Per the book only a relationship of employment would allow benefits to be accessed and agreements to be setup of this relationship.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.