You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by jpff <jp...@codemist.co.uk> on 2008/04/30 13:29:34 UTC

[OT] ClamAV

Has something happened to msrbl.com ?  I have been using the Image
database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.
==John ffitch

Re: [OT] ClamAV

Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
On 30.04.08 12:29, jpff wrote:
> Has something happened to msrbl.com ?  I have been using the Image
> database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.

their DNS is broken - glue records contain different IPs than domein itself,
one of servers is down and the another one contains valid records but NS
pointing to the first one and anoher that doesn't provide the domain.

check with dnsreport
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors

Re: [OT] ClamAV

Posted by Nigel Frankcom <ni...@blue-canoe.com>.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:29:34 +0100, jpff <jp...@codemist.co.uk> wrote:

>Has something happened to msrbl.com ?  I have been using the Image
>database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.
>==John ffitch

Hi John, seems OK from here.

Checking for .ndb files
Updated:   phish.ndb  Wed Apr 30 12:20:01 BST 2008
Updated:   scam.ndb  Wed Apr 30 12:20:01 BST 2008
No Update for:   MSRBL-SPAM.ndb  Available Wed Apr 30 12:20:01 BST
2008
Checking for .hdb files
Updated:   MSRBL-Images.hdb  Wed Apr 30 12:20:01 BST 2008
Stopping Clam AntiVirus Daemon: [  OK  ]
Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: [  OK  ]

Re: [OT] ClamAV

Posted by Arthur Dent <mi...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> On 30.04.2008 13:29, jpff wrote:
>> Has something happened to msrbl.com ?  I have been using the Image
>> database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.
>
> We get a lot of these errors:
> rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.mirror.msrbl.com 873: Name or service not known
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(94)
> rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.mirror.msrbl.com 873: Name or service not known
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(94)
>
> But every now and then, it works:
> Tue Apr 29 00:47:11 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 04:47:10 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 11:47:32 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 14:47:17 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 15:47:09 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 19:47:07 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Tue Apr 29 21:47:12 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Wed Apr 30 10:47:11 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
> Wed Apr 30 12:47:43 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
>

That's interesting. I don't use clamAV with SA - but I DO use it with procmail
and (using freshclam) I have been getting a LOT of these sort of errors
lately:

ERROR: getfile: Unknown response from remote server (IP: 80.82.245.8)
ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-6979.cdiff from db.uk.clamav.net

ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-6951.cdiff from db.uk.clamav.net

but as Wolfgang says, eventually it seems to get through and get the required
patch(es).

Mark


Re: [OT] ClamAV

Posted by Wolfgang Zeikat <wo...@desy.de>.
On 30.04.2008 13:29, jpff wrote:
> Has something happened to msrbl.com ?  I have been using the Image
> database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.

We get a lot of these errors:
rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.mirror.msrbl.com 873: Name or service not known
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(94)
rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.mirror.msrbl.com 873: Name or service not known
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(94)

But every now and then, it works:
Tue Apr 29 00:47:11 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 04:47:10 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 11:47:32 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 14:47:17 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 15:47:09 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 19:47:07 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Tue Apr 29 21:47:12 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Wed Apr 30 10:47:11 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found
Wed Apr 30 12:47:43 2008 -> new version of MSRBL-Images.hdb found

Regards,

wolfgang