You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2012/03/09 22:50:42 UTC
ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been fixed
since 0.92.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
Yours,
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
> Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>
The vote passes w/ 3*+1. I'll push it out later today.
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
I meant to write 5537
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 5523 is marked for 0.94.
>
> Did I miss something ?
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> We're running in production with something that's very close to what's
>> in this release (those missing are 5552, 5523, and 4890).
>>
>> I've also been banging quite heavily on what is now 0.92.1 in the past
>> few weeks.
>>
>> Unless a dumb bug creeped in, I'm confident we will be able to call
>> this our current stable release.
>>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
>> >
>> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
>> >
>> > This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been
>> fixed
>> > since 0.92.0:
>> >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
>> >
>> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
>> >
>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
>> > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>> >
>> > Yours,
>> > St.Ack
>>
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
5523 is marked for 0.94.
Did I miss something ?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> +1
>
> We're running in production with something that's very close to what's
> in this release (those missing are 5552, 5523, and 4890).
>
> I've also been banging quite heavily on what is now 0.92.1 in the past
> few weeks.
>
> Unless a dumb bug creeped in, I'm confident we will be able to call
> this our current stable release.
>
> J-D
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
> >
> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
> >
> > This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been
> fixed
> > since 0.92.0:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
> >
> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
> > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
> >
> > Yours,
> > St.Ack
>
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
+1
We're running in production with something that's very close to what's
in this release (those missing are 5552, 5523, and 4890).
I've also been banging quite heavily on what is now 0.92.1 in the past
few weeks.
Unless a dumb bug creeped in, I'm confident we will be able to call
this our current stable release.
J-D
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
>
> I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
>
> This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been fixed
> since 0.92.0:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
>
> You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
> Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>
> Yours,
> St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
> Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>
+1
Downloaded it, checked md5, started it up, checked doc., loaded a bit
of data in, checked logs. All seemed fine (but for HBASE-5595 which
we should fix for 0.92.2).
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
All ASF releases are in fact source releases, and the fact that we
provide binaries is technically "convenience", from what I've been
told. So, you can vote based on the source contents of the tarball --
if it compiles to something you feel is satisfactory for a release,
you can vote +1 even if you had to recompile.
Given that we're now moving to multiple builds, it may make sense to
have the release votes against source and also include a tarball for
1.0, 0.22, 0.23, etc.
-Todd
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume we should use 'mvn -Dhadoop.profile=22' to build HBase jar for
> deployment.
>
> Since it would be a different jar, I wonder whether the vote would count.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I wanted to validate this release.
>> > But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
>> >
>> > Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure what to
>> do
>> > here.
>> >
>>
>> Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
>> with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
>> cluster? If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1. See
>> end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Just curious:
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23/configurehas
the following parameters:
-U clean -Dmaven.test.redirectTestOutputToFile=true -Dhadoop.profile=23
site assembly:assembly
HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-23 build has never been green.
So ?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We tried out 0.92.1 with Hadoop-0.23.1 and it worked fine.
>
> Tried out things like bulk load, puts, scans on around 1000 regions
> including some long runs. It turned out to be fine. If running with
> 0.23.1
> is ok this RC am +1.
>
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:04 AM
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available
> > for download
> >
> > I assume we should use 'mvn -Dhadoop.profile=22' to build HBase jar for
> > deployment.
> >
> > Since it would be a different jar, I wonder whether the vote would
> > count.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I wanted to validate this release.
> > > > But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
> > > >
> > > > Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure
> > what to
> > > do
> > > > here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
> > > with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
> > > cluster? If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1.
> > See
> > > end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
>
>
RE: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for
download
Posted by "Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan" <ra...@huawei.com>.
Hi
We tried out 0.92.1 with Hadoop-0.23.1 and it worked fine.
Tried out things like bulk load, puts, scans on around 1000 regions
including some long runs. It turned out to be fine. If running with 0.23.1
is ok this RC am +1.
Regards
Ram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:04 AM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available
> for download
>
> I assume we should use 'mvn -Dhadoop.profile=22' to build HBase jar for
> deployment.
>
> Since it would be a different jar, I wonder whether the vote would
> count.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I wanted to validate this release.
> > > But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
> > >
> > > Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure
> what to
> > do
> > > here.
> > >
> >
> > Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
> > with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
> > cluster? If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1.
> See
> > end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I assume we should use 'mvn -Dhadoop.profile=22' to build HBase jar for
deployment.
Since it would be a different jar, I wonder whether the vote would count.
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wanted to validate this release.
> > But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
> >
> > Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure what to
> do
> > here.
> >
>
> Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
> with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
> cluster? If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1. See
> end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wanted to validate this release.
> But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
>
> Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure what to do
> here.
>
Download the tar ball, replace the bundled hadoop under the lib dir
with your hadoop 0.22 version and then run it on an hadoop 0.22
cluster? If its as good/bad as 0.92.x, you should be able to +1. See
end of this section: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop
Thanks,
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I wanted to validate this release.
But all the clusters I have access to run hadoop 0.22
Since the tar ball was built based on hadoop 1.0, I am not sure what to do
here.
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> The first hbase 0.92.1 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.1-candidate-0/
>
> I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins.
>
> This is for the most part a bug fix release. Here is what has been fixed
> since 0.92.0:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12318551
>
> You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.0 HBase up on this RC.
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.1? Take it for a spin.
> Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by March 16th, 2012.
>
> Yours,
> St.Ack
>