You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> on 2012/01/20 06:53:44 UTC
code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load
balancing) to 0.92
Hi,
The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that they
once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions in
each table balanced.
With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
Please review the patch.
Thanks
Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
I agree. As soon as 0.92.0 is released, let's talk about 0.94.
+1 on time based releases!
I think 0.92 shows that not doing frequent releases leads to a lot cruft accumulating in trunk, which then takes a lot of time to stabalize.
________________________________
From: Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: stack <st...@duboce.net>; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>; Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1
>
> I can wait till 0.92.0 is released.
IMO we should push it to 0.94.0. Point releases should be for minor
improvements and bug fixes. The fact that we divert so much energy
into past releases is part of why we're so slow to release the new
ones -- and the long period between the new releases I think
contributes to how unstable trunk gets in the meantime. I won't -1 it
for 0.92.1, but it just seems like a Bad Idea.
/me goes back to beating the 'we should do time-based releases' drum
-Todd
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting
>> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months
>> because we can't seem to say "no".
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that
>> they
>> > once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions
>> in
>> > each table balanced.
>> >
>> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
>> >
>> > Please review the patch.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load
balancing) to 0.92
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1
>
> I can wait till 0.92.0 is released.
IMO we should push it to 0.94.0. Point releases should be for minor
improvements and bug fixes. The fact that we divert so much energy
into past releases is part of why we're so slow to release the new
ones -- and the long period between the new releases I think
contributes to how unstable trunk gets in the meantime. I won't -1 it
for 0.92.1, but it just seems like a Bad Idea.
/me goes back to beating the 'we should do time-based releases' drum
-Todd
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting
>> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months
>> because we can't seem to say "no".
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that
>> they
>> > once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions
>> in
>> > each table balanced.
>> >
>> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
>> >
>> > Please review the patch.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load
balancing) to 0.92
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1
I can wait till 0.92.0 is released.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting
> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months
> because we can't seem to say "no".
>
> Todd
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that
> they
> > once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions
> in
> > each table balanced.
> >
> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
> >
> > Please review the patch.
> >
> > Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load
balancing) to 0.92
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting
more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months
because we can't seem to say "no".
Todd
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that they
> once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions in
> each table balanced.
>
> With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore.
>
> Please review the patch.
>
> Thanks
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera