You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@community.apache.org by cu...@apache.org on 2016/09/28 01:22:21 UTC
svn commit: r1762595 -
/comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext
Author: curcuru
Date: Wed Sep 28 01:22:21 2016
New Revision: 1762595
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1762595&view=rev
Log:
Point to CoC and emphasize on-list decisions
Modified:
comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext
Modified: comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext?rev=1762595&r1=1762594&r2=1762595&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext (original)
+++ comdev/site/trunk/content/contributors/etiquette.mdtext Wed Sep 28 01:22:21 2016
@@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ culture of others on the list is a key s
# One Member's Participation Guidelines # {#member}
-The ASF is run by several hundred Members, who have deep and lasting experience
+The ASF as a corporation is run by several hundred Members, who have deep and lasting experience
in helping to build and run long-term successful open source projects here
at Apache. This is just one member's take on how to approach
-communicating in an Apache project.
+communicating in any particular Apache project.
-**First a few general guidelines**
+**Some General Guidelines**
* Assume that the other party agrees more than disagrees with you. We
tend to leave out agreements and focus on differences. Sometime this is
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Review and try to reformulate to be as c
opinion, we must..." or the quite neutral "I think we should...", try to
use "Maybe we should consider..." or "Another idea that we could..."
- * If you disagree strongly with an email sent, tag it Important, then
+ * If you disagree strongly with an email sent, tag it Important, then
put it aside. Read it half a day later again. Put it aside. Read it again
next day, and then it is easier to write a balanced and inviting response,
instead of the initial vitriol that flows through us when we get upset. I
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ above (a-d) that are failing, or that th
aspect higher than you do. Sometimes, this requires compromises, sometimes
not and the different priorities can co-exist.
+ * Remember that everyone works on Apache projects as a volunteer.
+People have jobs and lives outside of their Apache projects, and may need
+more time to even read messages on the list or respond. Be patient.
**Most communities at Apache consists of level-headed, reasonable people**, who
have a strong vested interest in their Apache project. This interest, often
@@ -100,14 +103,17 @@ might not be needed either. Once we have
idea how that person is socially, we are much more capable to interact by
email.
-Note that project *decisions* should always be made on mailing lists.
+**Project decisions must always be made on mailing lists**.
It's great to have a synchronous online chat to work through some questions, but
be sure to bring the results of the chat - and any proposals for the
project community to consider - back to the mailing list. People who
weren't able to attend the chat or call might also have ideas on the topic.
+Be sure to allow at least 72 hours for others to read the proposals and
+comment before closing out the issue.
# Other Apache Etiquette Guidelines # {#other}
+ - [Official Apache-wide Code of Conduct][1]
- [Email Etiquette Guidelines - writing good emails](http://www.apache.org/dev/contrib-email-tips)
- [How To Ask Smart Questions](http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html)
- [Building Consensus in a community](http://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html)