You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> on 2007/02/23 22:39:25 UTC
[VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
approve this release.
Release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
public key is available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.html
The release has been tagged in SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC3/
Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
own comments, here:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.txt
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.txt
We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
consider showstoppers)
Thanks!
- The Apache UIMA team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Dear Incubator community,
Thanks to Dan Kulp, we have a +1 vote to release so far.
We need of course 3 binding +1 votes to release; could some other folks
please
take a look at this?
Thanks for your time and efforts in doing this - we really appreciate it!
-Marshall Schor
Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>
> The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
> public key is available here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
> The release has been tagged in SVN:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC3/
>
>
> Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
>
> We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
> own comments, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>
> The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.txt
>
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.txt
>
>
> We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
> consider showstoppers)
>
> Thanks!
> - The Apache UIMA team
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
Adam,
On Monday 05 March 2007 13:27, Adam Lally wrote:
> Is it sufficient for 3 and 4 to add this information only to our
> top-level "uimaj" pom, which is the parent of our other poms? And is
> this correct information to add:
> <licenses>
> <license>
> <name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
> <distribution>repo</distribution>
> </license>
> </licenses>
> <organization>
> <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> </organization>
That would be fine. The alternative would be to set the "parent" of your
parent to be:
<parent>
<groupId>org.apache</groupId>
<artifactId>apache</artifactId>
<version>4</version>
</parent>
(version 4 was just released, may not have hit all the mirrors yet)
Your parent pom would then inherit the licenses and organization sections
from there.
Dan
>
> I'm assuming <distribution>repo</distribution> doesn't actually
> obligate us to put anything in the ASF incubating repository
> unless/until we decide we want to. That decision hasn't been made
> yet, but writing the pom this way would leave our options open.
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com> wrote:
> <snip/>
>A quick look reveals:
>
> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
> critical one)
> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>
Dan,
Is it sufficient for 3 and 4 to add this information only to our
top-level "uimaj" pom, which is the parent of our other poms? And is
this correct information to add:
<licenses>
<license>
<name>The Apache Software License, Version 2.0</name>
<url>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt</url>
<distribution>repo</distribution>
</license>
</licenses>
<organization>
<name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
<url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
</organization>
I'm assuming <distribution>repo</distribution> doesn't actually
obligate us to put anything in the ASF incubating repository
unless/until we decide we want to. That decision hasn't been made
yet, but writing the pom this way would leave our options open.
Thanks,
-Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 2/27/07, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> From your post on general@i.a.o, it sounds like there are 2 classes of
> changes: adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars, and the others. The
> one about adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars is targeted for the
> next release, I think (right?) but it sounds like the others you think
> should get into this release (right?)?
>
> I guess that's OK but that implies we have to restart the vote, etc.
> (both on uima-dev and general@i.a.o?). My slight preference would be to
> not do this for this release, just to see if we can flush out other
> "issues" before going through all of this again. And if no issues come
> out - I don't think there's much downside to waiting till the next
> release to do these changes (please correct if wrong).
>
I agree with Marshall. If it's not a requirement to update our poms
if we're not releasing Maven artifacts, let's not do it quite yet.
-Adam
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
No, I didn't mean we would change anything for this release. I'm sorry
if that wasn't clear. Dan's comments only apply (I hope) if we want to
do a maven release, which we don't. I'd like to change these things for
the next release.
I had classed the disclaimer for the jars separately because that was
actually a conscious decision that I had thought about. The POM stuff
was completely new to me.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> It is my understanding that the jars don't need the disclaimer.
>> That's how I read the incubator release guide, and I also checked
>> other incubating projects' distributions (which is not sufficient by
>> itself). So to my mind, this applies only to jars distributed via
>> maven, where it makes sense. However, it won't hurt to add the
>> disclaimer to the jars, it's not a big deal and we may eventually want
>> to do maven distros.
>>
>> Sorry about the non-linear way I'm responding to this issue, I'm not
>> reading my mail in chronological order.
>
> From your post on general@i.a.o, it sounds like there are 2 classes of
> changes: adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars, and the others. The
> one about adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars is targeted for the
> next release, I think (right?) but it sounds like the others you think
> should get into this release (right?)?
>
> I guess that's OK but that implies we have to restart the vote, etc.
> (both on uima-dev and general@i.a.o?). My slight preference would be to
> not do this for this release, just to see if we can flush out other
> "issues" before going through all of this again. And if no issues come
> out - I don't think there's much downside to waiting till the next
> release to do these changes (please correct if wrong).
>
> Other opinions?
>
> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> It is my understanding that the jars don't need the disclaimer.
> That's how I read the incubator release guide, and I also checked
> other incubating projects' distributions (which is not sufficient by
> itself). So to my mind, this applies only to jars distributed via
> maven, where it makes sense. However, it won't hurt to add the
> disclaimer to the jars, it's not a big deal and we may eventually want
> to do maven distros.
>
> Sorry about the non-linear way I'm responding to this issue, I'm not
> reading my mail in chronological order.
From your post on general@i.a.o, it sounds like there are 2 classes of
changes: adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars, and the others. The
one about adding incubating disclaimer to the Jars is targeted for the
next release, I think (right?) but it sounds like the others you think
should get into this release (right?)?
I guess that's OK but that implies we have to restart the vote, etc.
(both on uima-dev and general@i.a.o?). My slight preference would be to
not do this for this release, just to see if we can flush out other
"issues" before going through all of this again. And if no issues come
out - I don't think there's much downside to waiting till the next
release to do these changes (please correct if wrong).
Other opinions?
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
It is my understanding that the jars don't need the disclaimer. That's
how I read the incubator release guide, and I also checked other
incubating projects' distributions (which is not sufficient by itself).
So to my mind, this applies only to jars distributed via maven, where
it makes sense. However, it won't hurt to add the disclaimer to the
jars, it's not a big deal and we may eventually want to do maven distros.
Sorry about the non-linear way I'm responding to this issue, I'm not
reading my mail in chronological order.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
> OK by me to post. I'm guessing that the reason the JARs need the
> disclaimer
> is that with Maven repositories, the unit of distribution is the "Jar",
> not a
> "zip" file. The think being distributed is supposed to contain the
> required
> files, I'm guessing...
> Perhaps you could ask Dan K for a pointer to more info on what
> are the requirements for publishing Maven artifacts.
>
> Cheers. -Marshall
>
> Adam Lally wrote:
>> Here's a suggested reply. OK to post?
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. For this release we decided not to consider
>> deploying our Maven artifacts to a shared repository, but instead
>> focus on satisfying all the published requirements for source and
>> binary releases, and just use Maven as our build tool. We will try to
>> address the issues you've pointed out for our next release so that we
>> will be able to publish our Maven artifacts.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/26/07, Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
>>> We got a reply (not from a IPMC member) to our release vote on
>>> general@incubator.i.o. Hopefully we can not deal with the Maven
>>> issues for this release, but one thing may be a problem - are our jars
>>> missing the DISCLAIMER file, and is that a requirement?
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>
>>> Date: Feb 25, 2007 5:29 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Cc: Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
>>> > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
>>> > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
>>> > approve this release.
>>> >
>>> > Release artifacts:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin
>>> distributions.
>>>
>>>
>>> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
>>> releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so
>>> other
>>> maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
>>> would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we
>>> can
>>> look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
>>>
>>> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
>>> critical one)
>>> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
>>> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
>>> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if
>>> there are
>>> maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> >
>>> > The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
>>> > public key is available here:
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/s
>>> >rc/main/readme/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > Release notes:
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.htm
>>> >l
>>> >
>>> > The release has been tagged in SVN:
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC
>>> >3/
>>> >
>>> > Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
>>> >
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
>>> >
>>> > We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
>>> > own comments, here:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>>> >
>>> > The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.
>>> >txt
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.
>>> >txt
>>> >
>>> > We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented
>>> here:
>>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
>>> > [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
>>> > consider showstoppers)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> > - The Apache UIMA team
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> J. Daniel Kulp
>>> Principal Engineer
>>> IONA
>>> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
>>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
OK by me to post. I'm guessing that the reason the JARs need the
disclaimer
is that with Maven repositories, the unit of distribution is the "Jar",
not a
"zip" file. The think being distributed is supposed to contain the required
files, I'm guessing...
Perhaps you could ask Dan K for a pointer to more info on what
are the requirements for publishing Maven artifacts.
Cheers. -Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
> Here's a suggested reply. OK to post?
>
> Thanks for your feedback. For this release we decided not to consider
> deploying our Maven artifacts to a shared repository, but instead
> focus on satisfying all the published requirements for source and
> binary releases, and just use Maven as our build tool. We will try to
> address the issues you've pointed out for our next release so that we
> will be able to publish our Maven artifacts.
>
>
>
> On 2/26/07, Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
>> We got a reply (not from a IPMC member) to our release vote on
>> general@incubator.i.o. Hopefully we can not deal with the Maven
>> issues for this release, but one thing may be a problem - are our jars
>> missing the DISCLAIMER file, and is that a requirement?
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>
>> Date: Feb 25, 2007 5:29 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>
>>
>>
>> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
>> > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
>> > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
>> > approve this release.
>> >
>> > Release artifacts:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>>
>> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin
>> distributions.
>>
>>
>> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
>> releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so
>> other
>> maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
>> would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we
>> can
>> look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
>>
>> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
>> critical one)
>> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
>> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
>> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>>
>>
>> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if
>> there are
>> maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> >
>> > The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
>> > public key is available here:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/s
>> >rc/main/readme/KEYS
>> >
>> > Release notes:
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.htm
>> >l
>> >
>> > The release has been tagged in SVN:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC
>> >3/
>> >
>> > Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
>> >
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
>> >
>> > We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
>> > own comments, here:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
>> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>> >
>> > The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.
>> >txt
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.
>> >txt
>> >
>> > We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented
>> here:
>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>> >
>> >
>> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
>> > [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
>> > consider showstoppers)
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > - The Apache UIMA team
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> --
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> IONA
>> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
Here's a suggested reply. OK to post?
Thanks for your feedback. For this release we decided not to consider
deploying our Maven artifacts to a shared repository, but instead
focus on satisfying all the published requirements for source and
binary releases, and just use Maven as our build tool. We will try to
address the issues you've pointed out for our next release so that we
will be able to publish our Maven artifacts.
On 2/26/07, Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
> We got a reply (not from a IPMC member) to our release vote on
> general@incubator.i.o. Hopefully we can not deal with the Maven
> issues for this release, but one thing may be a problem - are our jars
> missing the DISCLAIMER file, and is that a requirement?
>
> -Adam
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>
> Date: Feb 25, 2007 5:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>
>
>
> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
> > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> > approve this release.
> >
> > Release artifacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>
> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
>
>
> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
> releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
> maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
> would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can
> look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
>
> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
> critical one)
> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>
>
> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are
> maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
>
> Dan
>
> >
> > The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
> > public key is available here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/s
> >rc/main/readme/KEYS
> >
> > Release notes:
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.htm
> >l
> >
> > The release has been tagged in SVN:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC
> >3/
> >
> > Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
> >
> > We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
> > own comments, here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
> >
> > The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.
> >txt
> > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.
> >txt
> >
> > We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
> >
> >
> > We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> > [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
> > consider showstoppers)
> >
> > Thanks!
> > - The Apache UIMA team
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
We got a reply (not from a IPMC member) to our release vote on
general@incubator.i.o. Hopefully we can not deal with the Maven
issues for this release, but one thing may be a problem - are our jars
missing the DISCLAIMER file, and is that a requirement?
-Adam
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>
Date: Feb 25, 2007 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>
On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can
look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
critical one)
2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
3) The poms don't have a licenses section
4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are
maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
Dan
>
> The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
> public key is available here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/s
>rc/main/readme/KEYS
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.htm
>l
>
> The release has been tagged in SVN:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC
>3/
>
> Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
>
> We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
> own comments, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>
> The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.
>txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.
>txt
>
> We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
> consider showstoppers)
>
> Thanks!
> - The Apache UIMA team
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Just to be clear, we plan to fix the issues Dan raised in the next
release, which is not yet scheduled, but will be sometime in the
future. We ask that the Incubator PMC members review this, the current
release candidate, and look forward to your feedback and votes.
-Marshall Schor
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
>>> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
>>> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
>>> approve this release.
>>>
>>> Release artifacts:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>>
>> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin
>> distributions.
>
> Great!
>
>>
>>
>> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning
>> on releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository
>> so other maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have
>> problems. You would need to get those artifacts into the staging
>> area as well so we can look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
>
> We currently have no plans to release anything to the maven
> repository. Hopefully in the future sometime, but not for this release.
>
>>
>> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is
>> the critical one)
>
> I see. I didn't think this was required, but I understand it makes
> sense when individual jars are downloadable from the maven repo.
> We'll make sure to have the disclaimer in there before we release
> anything to the maven repository.
>
>> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it. 3) The
>> poms don't have a licenses section
>> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>
> All of these make sense, even if we're not distributing anything via
> maven repos (yet). Will fix. Thanks for taking the time to look at
> our release candidate.
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>>
>>
>> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if
>> there are maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with
>> it.
>>
>> Dan
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
>> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
>> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
>> approve this release.
>>
>> Release artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>
> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
Great!
>
>
> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
> releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
> maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
> would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can
> look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
We currently have no plans to release anything to the maven repository.
Hopefully in the future sometime, but not for this release.
>
> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
> critical one)
I see. I didn't think this was required, but I understand it makes
sense when individual jars are downloadable from the maven repo. We'll
make sure to have the disclaimer in there before we release anything to
the maven repository.
> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
All of these make sense, even if we're not distributing anything via
maven repos (yet). Will fix. Thanks for taking the time to look at our
release candidate.
--Thilo
>
>
> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are
> maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
>
> Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 2/25/07, Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com> wrote:
> A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
>
>
> HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
> releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
> maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
> would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can
> look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
>
> 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
> critical one)
> 2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
> 3) The poms don't have a licenses section
> 4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
>
>
> So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are
> maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
>
Dan,
Thanks for your feedback. For this release we decided not to consider
deploying our Maven artifacts to a shared repository, but instead
focus on satisfying all the published requirements for source and
binary releases, and just use Maven as our build tool.
We will try to address the issues you've pointed out for our next
release so that we
will be able to publish our Maven artifacts. If you could provide a
pointer to some documentation on what exactly the requirements for
Maven artifacts/poms are, that would be great.
-Adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions.
HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on
releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other
maven based projects can use it? If so, then we have problems. You
would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can
look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals:
1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the
critical one)
2) The <name> for jVinci doesn't have "Apache UIMA" in it.
3) The poms don't have a licenses section
4) The <organization> tag doesn't have a url to apache.org
So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are
maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it.
Dan
>
> The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
> public key is available here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/s
>rc/main/readme/KEYS
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.htm
>l
>
> The release has been tagged in SVN:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC
>3/
>
> Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
>
> We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
> own comments, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>
> The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.
>txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.
>txt
>
> We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
> consider showstoppers)
>
> Thanks!
> - The Apache UIMA team
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>.
Yeah sorry. Perhaps I should have explained my thoughts. But yes, will we
put license headers in generated files such as javadoc and maven site?
IMO if there is some easy plugin for maven or assembly that can do it, then
perhaps we should. But I don't want to spend a lot of time on it. Let me see
if I can find something that *integrates" with maven so it wont be any extra
steps for the release manager. :)
Frank
On 3/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You mean that we should include the ASL in generated stuff, such as
> our JavaDoc? Do you have other parts in mind?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although
> it
> > > isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
> > > end users aren't confused about usage [1].
> > >
> > > In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were
> > > you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's
> > > reasonable to do so.
> > >
> > > Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the
> > > committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you
> in
> > > a comment for various file types.
> >
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/%3c5CC03585-6EF3-44F5-BEE0-A7D0C159F482@gbiv.com%3e
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hmm....
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
>
>
> --
> Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
>
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
You mean that we should include the ASL in generated stuff, such as
our JavaDoc? Do you have other parts in mind?
Martijn
On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
>
> > Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it
> > isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
> > end users aren't confused about usage [1].
> >
> > In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were
> > you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's
> > reasonable to do so.
> >
> > Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the
> > committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you in
> > a comment for various file types.
>
>
> > ...
> >
>
> >
> > [1]
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/%3c5CC03585-6EF3-44F5-BEE0-A7D0C159F482@gbiv.com%3e
> >
>
>
>
> Hmm....
>
> WDYT?
>
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>.
On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it
> isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
> end users aren't confused about usage [1].
>
> In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were
> you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's
> reasonable to do so.
>
> Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the
> committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you in
> a comment for various file types.
> ...
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/%3c5CC03585-6EF3-44F5-BEE0-A7D0C159F482@gbiv.com%3e
>
Hmm....
WDYT?
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thanks for your careful review, Jean, much appreciated.
We'll fix these issues and retry :-)
My understanding is that the Status page needs to be updated by an ASF
member - we're working
with our Mentors to get this done.
If anyone else has comments / issues, please let us know so we can fix
more of them per "cycle" :-)
-Marshall
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
>
>> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
>> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
>> approve this release.
>>
>> Release artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
>> ...
>>
>
> I reviewed the uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz distribution. The
> signature verified fine. The incubator disclaimer in the DISCLAIMER and
> README files, which looks good to me.
>
> Below are four issues I spotted.
>
> (1) Source headers in generated output
>
> info from original post:
>
>> We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
>> own comments, here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>>
>> The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.txt
>> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.txt
>>
>
> Thanks for posting your RAT output, especially since you noted "the
> current version of RAT crashes on the UIMA source distrib". :-)
>
> Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it
> isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
> end users aren't confused about usage [1].
>
> In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were
> you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's
> reasonable to do so.
>
> Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the
> committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you in
> a comment for various file types.
>
> (2) Old headers
>
> When I ran insert_license.pl [3] in "practice" mode, it spotted these
> files that have the old-style copyright, and they must be replaced with
> the current header [2]:
>
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/CatalogManager.properties
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/project.properties
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/MANIFEST
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/xml-catalog.xml
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/css/stylesheet.css
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html.xsl
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf.xsl
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/common_custom.xsl
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/htmlsingle.xsl
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf/titlepage.xml
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf/custom.xsl
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html/titlepage.xml
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html/custom.xsl
>
> insert_license.pl [3] outputs a line like this for these files with the
> old header:
>
> uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html.xsl,
> extension=.xsl, fileType=xml, Found existing license (licenseType=AL-20)
> so skipping, WARN: old AL-20 copyright notice
>
> (3) NOTICE file
>
> Wasn't UIMA started with an initial code contribution? If so, I would
> expect its NOTICE file to include some sort of attribution; see:
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt
>
> (4) UIMA Podling status at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/uima.html
>
> The "copyright" and "verify distribution rights" work items haven't been
> checked off -- that suggests that the ip clearance hasn't quite yet been
> completed yet. Or maybe it has and the status just needs to be updated
> to reflect reality.
>
> So, issues 2-4 must be fixed.
>
> -jean
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/%3c5CC03585-6EF3-44F5-BEE0-A7D0C159F482@gbiv.com%3e
> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> [3]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/src/perl/insert_license.pl
>
>
>> We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>>
>>
>> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
>> consider showstoppers)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> - The Apache UIMA team
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
> ...
I reviewed the uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz distribution. The
signature verified fine. The incubator disclaimer in the DISCLAIMER and
README files, which looks good to me.
Below are four issues I spotted.
(1) Source headers in generated output
info from original post:
> We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
> own comments, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
>
> The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.txt
Thanks for posting your RAT output, especially since you noted "the
current version of RAT crashes on the UIMA source distrib". :-)
Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it
isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so
end users aren't confused about usage [1].
In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were
you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's
reasonable to do so.
Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the
committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you in
a comment for various file types.
(2) Old headers
When I ran insert_license.pl [3] in "practice" mode, it spotted these
files that have the old-style copyright, and they must be replaced with
the current header [2]:
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/CatalogManager.properties
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/project.properties
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/MANIFEST
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/xml-catalog.xml
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/css/stylesheet.css
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html.xsl
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf.xsl
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/common_custom.xsl
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/htmlsingle.xsl
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf/titlepage.xml
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/pdf/custom.xsl
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html/titlepage.xml
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html/custom.xsl
insert_license.pl [3] outputs a line like this for these files with the
old header:
uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/html.xsl,
extension=.xsl, fileType=xml, Found existing license (licenseType=AL-20)
so skipping, WARN: old AL-20 copyright notice
(3) NOTICE file
Wasn't UIMA started with an initial code contribution? If so, I would
expect its NOTICE file to include some sort of attribution; see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt
(4) UIMA Podling status at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/uima.html
The "copyright" and "verify distribution rights" work items haven't been
checked off -- that suggests that the ip clearance hasn't quite yet been
completed yet. Or maybe it has and the status just needs to be updated
to reflect reality.
So, issues 2-4 must be fixed.
-jean
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/%3c5CC03585-6EF3-44F5-BEE0-A7D0C159F482@gbiv.com%3e
[2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
[3]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/src/perl/insert_license.pl
> We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
>
>
> We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
> consider showstoppers)
>
> Thanks!
> - The Apache UIMA team
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Fwd: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
FYI for those who may not read general@incubator.a.o
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Feb 23, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
To: general@incubator.apache.org
The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
approve this release.
Release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
The release was signed by Thilo Goetz, our release manager. His
public key is available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES.html
The release has been tagged in SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC3/
Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02306.html
We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our
own comments, here:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src.txt
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin.txt
The original unedited RAT reports are also posted:
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-src-full.txt
http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/RAT/RAT-bin-full.txt
We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
consider showstoppers)
Thanks!
- The Apache UIMA team