You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> on 2007/01/12 21:17:35 UTC
getting rid of old maven files?
Why don't we get rid of the old project.xml (maven 1) files. The
current versions don't have the new logger dependency, and I think
it's a pain to keep maintaining them anyway.
WDYT?
Eelco
Re: getting rid of old maven files?
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 1/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why don't we get rid of the old project.xml (maven 1) files. The
> current versions don't have the new logger dependency, and I think
> it's a pain to keep maintaining them anyway.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Eelco
>
Re: getting rid of old maven files?
Posted by Juergen Donnerstag <ju...@gmail.com>.
+1
Juergen
On 1/13/07, Sean Sullivan <se...@seansullivan.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 1/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why don't we get rid of the old project.xml (maven 1) files. The
> > current versions don't have the new logger dependency, and I think
> > it's a pain to keep maintaining them anyway.
> >
>
>
Re: getting rid of old maven files?
Posted by Sean Sullivan <se...@seansullivan.com>.
+1
On 1/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why don't we get rid of the old project.xml (maven 1) files. The
> current versions don't have the new logger dependency, and I think
> it's a pain to keep maintaining them anyway.
>
Re: getting rid of old maven files?
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
fine by me
-igor
On 1/12/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why don't we get rid of the old project.xml (maven 1) files. The
> current versions don't have the new logger dependency, and I think
> it's a pain to keep maintaining them anyway.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Eelco
>