You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/03/07 18:26:31 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7741] -
some directives may be placed outside of proper context without causing an error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7741>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7741
some directives may be placed outside of proper context without causing an error
------- Additional Comments From nd@perlig.de 2003-03-07 17:26 -------
The LimitRequest* directives are (kind of) half valid in VH context. They fully
apply to IP-based VHs and to the default Name-based VH (i.e. the first one with
the particular IP/Port combination). TimeOut has btw. the same restriction.
Quite complicated. I'm not sure, whether it's so easy to detect at configuration
time, which type of VH is currently processed.
And I'm not sure, whether it's so useful to document it that way.
Opinions?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org