Web site in git

[Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>]

I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
the htdocs branch on git.

I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
know how much that code will change anyway.
It's a small gesture to help push its development.

Re: Web site in git

[Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>]

Yeah. Delete away!

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Deferring to Paul, but sounds okay.
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Okay if I just delete the branch?
>> On Feb 24, 2012 3:36 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Randal, can you rewind your changes please?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time
>> > > being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds <
>> randall.leeds@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> Hey,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the
>> website
>> > > in
>> > > >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to
>> it.
>> > We
>> > > >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra
>> > first.
>> > > >
>> > > > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have
>> no
>> > > > integration.
>> > > > Probably a silly gesture.
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <
>> > randall.leeds@gmail.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
>> > > >>> the htdocs branch on git.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
>> > > >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
>> > > >>> know how much that code will change anyway.
>> > > >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>>

Re: Web site in git

[Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>]

Deferring to Paul, but sounds okay.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Okay if I just delete the branch?
> On Feb 24, 2012 3:36 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> > Randal, can you rewind your changes please?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time
> > > being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds <
> randall.leeds@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> Hey,
> > > >>
> > > >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the
> website
> > > in
> > > >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to
> it.
> > We
> > > >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra
> > first.
> > > >
> > > > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have
> no
> > > > integration.
> > > > Probably a silly gesture.
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <
> > randall.leeds@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
> > > >>> the htdocs branch on git.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
> > > >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
> > > >>> know how much that code will change anyway.
> > > >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
>

Re: Web site in git

[Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>]

Okay if I just delete the branch?
On Feb 24, 2012 3:36 PM, "Noah Slater" <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:

> Randal, can you rewind your changes please?
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time
> > being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> > >> Hey,
> > >>
> > >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the website
> > in
> > >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to it.
> We
> > >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra
> first.
> > >
> > > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have no
> > > integration.
> > > Probably a silly gesture.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <
> randall.leeds@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
> > >>> the htdocs branch on git.
> > >>>
> > >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
> > >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
> > >>> know how much that code will change anyway.
> > >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
> > >>>
> >
>

Re: Web site in git

[Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>]

Randal, can you rewind your changes please?

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time
> being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured.
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the website
> in
> >> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to it. We
> >> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra first.
> >
> > I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have no
> > integration.
> > Probably a silly gesture.
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
> >>> the htdocs branch on git.
> >>>
> >>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
> >>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
> >>> know how much that code will change anyway.
> >>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
> >>>
>

Re: Web site in git

[Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>]

Indeed. Infra is requiring website code to remain in SVN for the time
being and use the svnpubsub stuff they have configured.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the website in
>> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to it. We
>> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra first.
>
> I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have no
> integration.
> Probably a silly gesture.
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
>>> the htdocs branch on git.
>>>
>>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
>>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
>>> know how much that code will change anyway.
>>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
>>>

Re: Web site in git

[Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 00:00, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the website in
> Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to it. We
> may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra first.

I had the same thought, but went ahead anyway knowing it would have no
integration.
Probably a silly gesture.

>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
>> the htdocs branch on git.
>>
>> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
>> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
>> know how much that code will change anyway.
>> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
>>

Re: Web site in git

[Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>]

Hey,

I appreciate the gesture. But I think we may need to leave the website in
Subversion for now. The infrastructure side of things hooks in to it. We
may be able to move to Git, but we should clarify that with infra first.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I just pulled the site/htdocs directory from svn and put it up into
> the htdocs branch on git.
>
> I goofed and didn't have site checked out, only htdocs, but rather
> than make more noise right now I won't correct that, since I don't
> know how much that code will change anyway.
> It's a small gesture to help push its development.
>