You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu> on 2007/03/07 16:47:13 UTC
RAT reports?
Thilo or Michael, can you produce new annotated RAT reports for RC4 as
you did for the previous release candidate?
Thanks,
-Adam
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
>> Ups... I fixed this now. I compared the two RAT reports from RC3 and RC4
>> to check the differences. As there were only a few changes in the
>> reports, so we decide to
>> just update the annotated RAT report Thilo created last time with the
>> changes. Seems that the locations are not updated correctly. But this
>> should be fixed now.
>>
>> The current RC4 RAT report is also available containing all the data.
>>
>
> OK that looks better.
>
> However this file was removed from the source distrib. but is still
> showing in the RAT report:
> N
> D:/code/apache/uimaj-2.1.0-RC4/uimaj-distr/target/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/LICENSE.txt
>
>
>
I also fixed that... and it seems that the idea was a little bit buggy.
So maybe it is better to focus on the full RAT report that was created
to RC4.
I have also rechecked the files... so I hope I used the correct versions
and there are no more errors. :-)
-- Michael
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 3/7/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
> Ups... I fixed this now. I compared the two RAT reports from RC3 and RC4
> to check the differences. As there were only a few changes in the
> reports, so we decide to
> just update the annotated RAT report Thilo created last time with the
> changes. Seems that the locations are not updated correctly. But this
> should be fixed now.
>
> The current RC4 RAT report is also available containing all the data.
>
OK that looks better.
However this file was removed from the source distrib. but is still
showing in the RAT report:
N D:/code/apache/uimaj-2.1.0-RC4/uimaj-distr/target/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/LICENSE.txt
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
>> The RAT reports are ready and available at
>> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/
>>
>>
>
> The RAT reports seem to have many mentions of RC3 in them, for example:
> c:/code/RC3/uimaj-2.1.0-RC3/uimaj-distr/target/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/DISCLAIMER
>
Ups... I fixed this now. I compared the two RAT reports from RC3 and RC4
to check the differences. As there were only a few changes in the
reports, so we decide to
just update the annotated RAT report Thilo created last time with the
changes. Seems that the locations are not updated correctly. But this
should be fixed now.
The current RC4 RAT report is also available containing all the data.
-- Michael
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.
On 3/7/07, Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
> The RAT reports are ready and available at
> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/
>
The RAT reports seem to have many mentions of RC3 in them, for example:
c:/code/RC3/uimaj-2.1.0-RC3/uimaj-distr/target/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating/DISCLAIMER
-Adam
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Adam Lally wrote:
>> Thilo or Michael, can you produce new annotated RAT reports for RC4 as
>> you did for the previous release candidate?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Adam
>>
>>
> We are currently working on it...
The RAT reports are ready and available at
http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/
-- Michael
Re: RAT reports?
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Adam Lally wrote:
> Thilo or Michael, can you produce new annotated RAT reports for RC4 as
> you did for the previous release candidate?
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
>
>
We are currently working on it...
-- Michael