[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2816) MMapDirectory speedups

["Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2816.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Committed revision 1052892 to branch_3x.

> MMapDirectory speedups
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2816
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2816
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 3.1, 4.0
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2816.patch
>
>
> MMapDirectory has some performance problems:
> # When the file is larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE, we use MultiMMapIndexInput, 
> which does a lot of unnecessary bounds-checks for its buffer-switching etc. 
> Instead, like MMapIndexInput, it should rely upon the contract of these operations
> in ByteBuffer (which will do a bounds check always and throw BufferUnderflowException).
> Our 'buffer' is so large (Integer.MAX_VALUE) that its rare this happens and doing
> our own bounds checks just slows things down.
> # the readInt()/readLong()/readShort() are slow and should just defer to ByteBuffer.readInt(), etc
> This isn't very important since we don't much use these, but I think there's no reason
> users (e.g. codec writers) should have to readBytes() + wrap as bytebuffer + get an 
> IntBuffer view when readInt() can be almost as fast...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org