RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/aolse rver jk_logger_ns.c jk_ns.h jk_service_ns.c jni_nslog.c jni_nstcl.c jni_n stcl.h nsjk2.c nsjk2.dsp

["Ignacio J. Ortega" <na...@siapi.es>]

> From: mturk@apache.org [mailto:mturk@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 8:37 AM
> To: jakarta-tomcat-connectors-cvs@apache.org
> Subject: cvs commit:
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/aolserver jk_logger_ns.c
> jk_ns.h jk_service_ns.c jni_nslog.c jni_nstcl.c jni_nstcl.h nsjk2.c
> nsjk2.dsp
> 

Do we really need to add a tcl JNI interface to apache repository? it
has anything to do with connectors? i've tried to follow every
email-thread about AOLserver module, and frankly i didnt find any valid
reason to do so, can anyone explain why?

Saludos, 
Ignacio J. Ortega 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/aolserver jk_logger_ns.c jk_ns.h jk_service_ns.c jni_nslog.c jni_nstcl.c jni_nstcl.h nsjk2.c nsjk2.dsp

[Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ignacio J. Ortega
> 
> Do we really need to add a tcl JNI interface to apache 
> repository? it has anything to do with connectors? i've tried 
> to follow every email-thread about AOLserver module, and 
> frankly i didnt find any valid reason to do so, can anyone 
> explain why?
> 

No, that was also my major objection, but the guys said they will make
the separate module for that, and then we'll drop that.
AFAICT they are in the process of splitting the java logger (the JNI
part of nsjk2), to separate module.

MT.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org