Cache modules out of the experimental area?

[Jean-Jacques Clar <JJ...@novell.com>]

We have probably over 1000 hours of testing under high loads on UP and
MP servers (up to 8) running NetWare on mod_cache and mod_mem_cache in
our performance and testing labs.
It looks like the modules are running correctly when used as local
caching mechanism.
 
Are there reasons why the modules are still in the experimental area?
 
Thank you,
 
Jean-Jacques Clar

Re: Cache modules out of the experimental area?

[Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>]

Bill Stoddard wrote:

> I am almost ready to +1 moving mod_cache and mod_mem_cache out of 
> experimental. Almost because I believe there are some RFC 2616 
> violations in mod_cache (search bugzilla) that need to be investigated.

If you are looking for RFC 2616 violations, also look in bugzilla under 
mod_proxy - some of the violations have been posted there that relate to 
mod_proxy + mod_cache.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm		"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
						tonight..."

Re: Cache modules out of the experimental area?

[Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>]

Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:

> We have probably over 1000 hours of testing under high loads on UP and 
> MP servers (up to 8) running NetWare on mod_cache and mod_mem_cache in 
> our performance and testing labs.
> It looks like the modules are running correctly when used as local 
> caching mechanism.
>  
> Are there reasons why the modules are still in the experimental area?
>  
> Thank you,
>  
> Jean-Jacques Clar

I am almost ready to +1 moving mod_cache and mod_mem_cache out of 
experimental. Almost because I believe there are some RFC 2616 
violations in mod_cache (search bugzilla) that need to be investigated.

Bill