You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Sonali Jadhav <so...@servercentralen.se> on 2015/01/30 12:41:29 UTC

shared network vs isolated network

Hi,

I have deployed zone with Security groups disabled. I have few doubts,

1)      For getting shared network working is it required to have zone enabled with security groups?

2)      Why is that Public IP ranges added on Public NIC can't be used for shared network?

3)      Isn't it weird that we have to add public IP ranges for shared network on Guest NIC and for isolated network on Public NIC? I mean why two different NIC ? in the end its public network  traffic.
/sonali

RE: shared network vs isolated network

Posted by dobropalka <do...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Sonali
1) no, security groups are not mandatory
2) 3) As far as I know public IPs (from public network) can be attached to
VM only with SNAT service. You can create public net with SNAT service. I
tried it when 4.2 was the last release but couldn't make it work. Maybe 4.4
doesn't have those bugs

-----Original Message-----
From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:sonali@servercentralen.se] 
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 2:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: shared network vs isolated network

Hi,

I have deployed zone with Security groups disabled. I have few doubts,

1)      For getting shared network working is it required to have zone
enabled with security groups?

2)      Why is that Public IP ranges added on Public NIC can't be used for
shared network?

3)      Isn't it weird that we have to add public IP ranges for shared
network on Guest NIC and for isolated network on Public NIC? I mean why two
different NIC ? in the end its public network  traffic.
/sonali


Re: shared network vs isolated network

Posted by Somesh Naidu <So...@citrix.com>.
> Isn't it weird that we have to add public IP ranges for shared network on Guest NIC and for isolated network on Public NIC? I mean why two different NIC ? in the end its public network  traffic.

Not really. Are you saying that public and guest networks should use IPs from the same pool? You do realize that networks and their IP ranges are categorized based on the traffic and not the network segment.

-somesh

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Jan 30, 2015 6:42 AM, Sonali Jadhav <so...@servercentralen.se> wrote:
Hi,

I have deployed zone with Security groups disabled. I have few doubts,

1)      For getting shared network working is it required to have zone enabled with security groups?

2)      Why is that Public IP ranges added on Public NIC can't be used for shared network?

3)      Isn't it weird that we have to add public IP ranges for shared network on Guest NIC and for isolated network on Public NIC? I mean why two different NIC ? in the end its public network  traffic.
/sonali