You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com> on 2014/02/08 01:51:39 UTC
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
List of changes:
<Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing links here for now>
New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12 5:00PM PST.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
On 11.02.2014 00:50, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nux! [mailto:nux@li.nux.ro]
>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:41 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>>
>>
>> Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
>>
> [Animesh] I will let folks weigh in on whether this should block the
> release. Does it affects other hypervisors besides KVM?
Seems specific to KVM agent from what I understand in Sadhu's comments.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nux! [mailto:nux@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
>
> Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
>
[Animesh] I will let folks weigh in on whether this should block the release. Does it affects other hypervisors besides KVM?
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
On 10.02.2014 21:17, Edison Su wrote:
> +1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud,
> it works as it is.
Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
+1 (binding) verified release artifacts, tested with devcloud, worked fine.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edison Su [mailto:Edison.su@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> +1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud, it works
> as it is.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >
> > vote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> > https://git-wip-
> > us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> > Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
> >
> >
> > List of changes:
> >
> > <Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
> > links here for now>
> >
> > New Features in 4.3:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
> >
> > Improvement in 4.3:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
> >
> > Issues fixed in 4.3
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
> >
> > Known Issues in 4.3:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >
> > location):
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
> >
> >
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> > Testing instructions are here:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
> > ocedure
> >
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
> > 5:00PM PST.
> >
> >
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>.
+1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud, it works as it is.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
> vote:
>
>
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-
> us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
> List of changes:
>
> <Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing links here
> for now>
>
> New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
> Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
> Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
> Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
> location):
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
> Testing instructions are here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr
> ocedure
>
>
>
> Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
> 5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Ok that's good start with a +1
Thanks
Animesh
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:13 PM, "Marcus" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
> installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
> storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
>
> Built DEBs on Ubuntu 12.04, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
> installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
> storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>
>> vote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
>> Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>>
>>
>> List of changes:
>>
>> <Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing links here for now>
>>
>> New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>>
>> Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>>
>> Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>>
>> Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>
>> location):
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>>
>>
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>>
>>
>> Testing instructions are here:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>>
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12 5:00PM PST.
>>
>>
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Marcus <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Built DEBs on Ubuntu 12.04, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
<an...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
> vote:
>
>
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
> List of changes:
>
> <Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing links here for now>
>
> New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
> Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
> Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
> Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
> location):
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
> Testing instructions are here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
>
>
>
> Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12 5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Daan
So what is the final status on CLOUDSTACK-6069? I will respin another RC and looks like Kishan/Murali cannot reproduce it
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:09 AM
> To: Kishan Kavala; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Yes it does,
>
> Two guest networks both tagged. system net offer isn't tagged. that's why it
> is strange it used to work.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:Kishan.Kavala@citrix.com]
> Sent: donderdag 13 februari 2014 11:59
> To: Daan Hoogland; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Daan,
> I couldn't repo CLOUDSTACK-6069 in my regular VPC setup. Does this
> happen only when using mixed setup with Nicira?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2014 2:29 PM
> > To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >
> > I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not
> > high on my prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in
> > our production systems that I will get out of the way first.
> >
> > What I can say is that I am puzzled that my test works in 4.2 and
> > before as I instantiate a private gateway with associated network,
> > while the system network offering for private gateways has no tags and
> > I have two guest networks.
> >
> > I will return to this issue when given time.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> > Sent: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >
> > Adding Murali as well.
> >
> > Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during
> > 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Animesh
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
> > > To: dev
> > > Cc: Kishan Kavala
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
> > >
> > > I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > Daan
> > > >
> > > > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for
> > > > his input
> > > >
> > > > Animesh
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > > >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> > > >> To: dev
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> > > >>
> > > >> H,
> > > >>
> > > >> -1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn
> > > >> out to be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my
> setup.
> > > >> I have four basic test cases|:
> > > >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network
> > > >> and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway
> > > >> (and
> > > >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway -
> > > >> works
> > > >>
> > > >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was
> > > >> always giving me the most problems. The others worked on the
> previous rc.
> > > >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using
> > > >> 4.3 if it passes but it needs fixing asap.
> > > >>
> > > >> setup
> > > >> 1 zone
> > > >> 1 pod
> > > >> 1 cluster
> > > >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> > > >>
> > > >> 2 physnets
> > > >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"),
> > > >> Management,
> > > >> Storage)
> > > >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> > > >>
> > > >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a
> > > >> 530 server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority
> > > >> vote. One of the things that makes me hesitate is
> > > >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> > > >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> > > >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on
> > > >> device
> > > >> tunnel0
> > > >> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> > > >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> > > >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host
> > > >> 10.200.23.42 on device tunnel0
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > > >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Hi All,
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> > > >> >>> for a
> > > >> >>> vote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS,
> > > >> >> +KVM,
> > > >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Nux!
> > > >> > www.nux.ro
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Daan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <DH...@schubergphilis.com>.
Yes it does,
Two guest networks both tagged. system net offer isn't tagged. that's why it is strange it used to work.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:Kishan.Kavala@citrix.com]
Sent: donderdag 13 februari 2014 11:59
To: Daan Hoogland; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Daan,
I couldn't repo CLOUDSTACK-6069 in my regular VPC setup. Does this happen only when using mixed setup with Nicira?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2014 2:29 PM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not
> high on my prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in
> our production systems that I will get out of the way first.
>
> What I can say is that I am puzzled that my test works in 4.2 and
> before as I instantiate a private gateway with associated network,
> while the system network offering for private gateways has no tags and
> I have two guest networks.
>
> I will return to this issue when given time.
>
> Regards,
> Daan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Adding Murali as well.
>
> Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during
> 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
> > To: dev
> > Cc: Kishan Kavala
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
> >
> > I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > Daan
> > >
> > > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for
> > > his input
> > >
> > > Animesh
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> > >> To: dev
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> > >>
> > >> H,
> > >>
> > >> -1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn
> > >> out to be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> > >> I have four basic test cases|:
> > >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network
> > >> and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway
> > >> (and
> > >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway -
> > >> works
> > >>
> > >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was
> > >> always giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> > >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using
> > >> 4.3 if it passes but it needs fixing asap.
> > >>
> > >> setup
> > >> 1 zone
> > >> 1 pod
> > >> 1 cluster
> > >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> > >>
> > >> 2 physnets
> > >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"),
> > >> Management,
> > >> Storage)
> > >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> > >>
> > >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a
> > >> 530 server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority
> > >> vote. One of the things that makes me hesitate is
> > >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> > >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> > >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on
> > >> device
> > >> tunnel0
> > >> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> > >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> > >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host
> > >> 10.200.23.42 on device tunnel0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi All,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> > >> >>> for a
> > >> >>> vote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS,
> > >> >> +KVM,
> > >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> > >> >
> > >> > Nux!
> > >> > www.nux.ro
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Kishan Kavala <Ki...@citrix.com>.
Daan,
I couldn't repo CLOUDSTACK-6069 in my regular VPC setup. Does this happen only when using mixed setup with Nicira?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2014 2:29 PM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not high on my
> prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in our production
> systems that I will get out of the way first.
>
> What I can say is that I am puzzled that my test works in 4.2 and before as I
> instantiate a private gateway with associated network, while the system
> network offering for private gateways has no tags and I have two guest
> networks.
>
> I will return to this issue when given time.
>
> Regards,
> Daan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Adding Murali as well.
>
> Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to
> cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
> > To: dev
> > Cc: Kishan Kavala
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
> >
> > I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> > <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > Daan
> > >
> > > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his
> > > input
> > >
> > > Animesh
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> > >> To: dev
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> > >>
> > >> H,
> > >>
> > >> -1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out
> > >> to be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> > >> I have four basic test cases|:
> > >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network
> > >> and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway
> > >> (and
> > >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway -
> > >> works
> > >>
> > >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always
> > >> giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> > >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3
> > >> if it passes but it needs fixing asap.
> > >>
> > >> setup
> > >> 1 zone
> > >> 1 pod
> > >> 1 cluster
> > >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> > >>
> > >> 2 physnets
> > >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"),
> > >> Management,
> > >> Storage)
> > >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> > >>
> > >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530
> > >> server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One
> > >> of the things that makes me hesitate is
> > >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> > >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> > >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on
> > >> device
> > >> tunnel0
> > >> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> > >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> > >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42
> > >> on device tunnel0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi All,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> > >> >>> for a
> > >> >>> vote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS,
> > >> >> +KVM,
> > >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> > >> >
> > >> > Nux!
> > >> > www.nux.ro
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <DH...@schubergphilis.com>.
I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not high on my prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in our production systems that I will get out of the way first.
What I can say is that I am puzzled that my test works in 4.2 and before as I instantiate a private gateway with associated network, while the system network offering for private gateways has no tags and I have two guest networks.
I will return to this issue when given time.
Regards,
Daan
-----Original Message-----
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
Sent: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Adding Murali as well.
Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
Thanks
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
> To: dev
> Cc: Kishan Kavala
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
>
> I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Daan
> >
> > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his
> > input
> >
> > Animesh
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> >> To: dev
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >>
> >> H,
> >>
> >> -1 (binding)
> >>
> >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out
> >> to be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> >> I have four basic test cases|:
> >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network
> >> and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway
> >> (and
> >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway -
> >> works
> >>
> >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always
> >> giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3
> >> if it passes but it needs fixing asap.
> >>
> >> setup
> >> 1 zone
> >> 1 pod
> >> 1 cluster
> >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> >>
> >> 2 physnets
> >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"),
> >> Management,
> >> Storage)
> >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> >>
> >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530
> >> server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One
> >> of the things that makes me hesitate is
> >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on
> >> device
> >> tunnel0
> >> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42
> >> on device tunnel0
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> >> >>> for a
> >> >>> vote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS,
> >> >> +KVM,
> >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >> >
> >> > Nux!
> >> > www.nux.ro
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Adding Murali as well.
Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further?
Thanks
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM
> To: dev
> Cc: Kishan Kavala
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
>
> I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> <an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Daan
> >
> > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his
> > input
> >
> > Animesh
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> >> To: dev
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> >>
> >> H,
> >>
> >> -1 (binding)
> >>
> >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to
> >> be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> >> I have four basic test cases|:
> >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network and
> >> create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway (and
> >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway -
> >> works
> >>
> >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always
> >> giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if
> >> it passes but it needs fixing asap.
> >>
> >> setup
> >> 1 zone
> >> 1 pod
> >> 1 cluster
> >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> >>
> >> 2 physnets
> >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"),
> >> Management,
> >> Storage)
> >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> >>
> >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530
> >> server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One
> >> of the things that makes me hesitate is
> >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device
> >> tunnel0
> >> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42
> >> on device tunnel0
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for
> >> >>> a
> >> >>> vote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS,
> >> >> +KVM,
> >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >> >
> >> > Nux!
> >> > www.nux.ro
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
<an...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Daan
>
> Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his input
>
> Animesh
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>>
>> H,
>>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to be a
>> setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
>> I have four basic test cases|:
>> 1. create network and vm on top - works
>> 2. create bridged network and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with
>> private gateway (and ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private
>> gateway - works
>>
>> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always giving me
>> the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
>> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if it passes
>> but it needs fixing asap.
>>
>> setup
>> 1 zone
>> 1 pod
>> 1 cluster
>> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
>>
>> 2 physnets
>> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), Management,
>> Storage)
>> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
>>
>> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530 server
>> error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One of the things that
>> makes me hesitate is
>> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
>> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device
>> tunnel0
>> 4.3.0 code (failing)
>> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42 on
>> device tunnel0
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> >>> vote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
>> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
>> >
>> >
>> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >
>> > Nux!
>> > www.nux.ro
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
--
Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Daan
Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his input
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> H,
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to be a
> setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> I have four basic test cases|:
> 1. create network and vm on top - works
> 2. create bridged network and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with
> private gateway (and ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private
> gateway - works
>
> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always giving me
> the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if it passes
> but it needs fixing asap.
>
> setup
> 1 zone
> 1 pod
> 1 cluster
> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
>
> 2 physnets
> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), Management,
> Storage)
> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
>
> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530 server
> error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One of the things that
> makes me hesitate is
> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device
> tunnel0
> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42 on
> device tunnel0
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >>> vote:
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> >
> >
> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
H,
-1 (binding)
I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to
be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
I have four basic test cases|:
1. create network and vm on top - works
2. create bridged network and create vm on it - works
3. create a vpc with private gateway (and ...) - fails
4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway - works
I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always
giving me the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if
it passes but it needs fixing asap.
setup
1 zone
1 pod
1 cluster
2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
2 physnets
- physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), Management, Storage)
- physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530
server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One of
the things that makes me hesitate is
4.2.1 code (succeeding):
2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device
tunnel0
4.3.0 code (failing)
2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42 on
device tunnel0
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
>>
>> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>
>>
>> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
>> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
>
>
> There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
>
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
--
Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Adding Kelven to the thread
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nux! [mailto:nux@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:29 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> > On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >> vote:
> >
> > +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
> > NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
>
> There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>
> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Mike Tutkowski <mi...@solidfire.com>.
I plan to test out a bunch of storage use cases on Monday afternoon when I
have time, so I can chime in at that point.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>
>> vote:
>>
>
> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM, NFS,
> CLVM, Adv+SG.
>
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*(tm)*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> vote:
>
> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
I'm also making it -1, based on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065 - broken HA on
KVM
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6083 - missing cidrs
in firewall rules after upgrade from 4.2.1
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Nux! <nu...@li.nux.ro>.
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
> vote:
+1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Alex
Based on the response from Min and Devdeep IMO the compatibility is not broken. Do you have any more reason to keep a -1.
Thanks
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:alex.hitchins@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> -1
>
> As below - I don't think this can go out given it breaks API on a non-major
> release.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Alex Hitchins
>
> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
>
> alex.hitchins@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.angus@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 12 February 2014 12:14
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> -1
>
> See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)'
>
> There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing
> an array of details i.e
>
> details[0].key=<>&details[0].value=<>&details[1].key=<>&details[1].value=
> <>
>
> I don't think this is fully understood (at least by me) or documented or fully
> discussed.
>
> I haven't figured out if/how Cloudmonkey can pass it as a CLI command.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com]
> Sent: 12 February 2014 11:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
>
> Santhosh
> ________________________________________
> From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> +1
> Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> <an...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> >I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >
> >vote:
> >
> >
> >
> >Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r
> >efs
> >/heads/4.3
> >Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
> >
> >
> >List of changes:
> >
> ><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
> >links here for now>
> >
> >New Features in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
> >
> >Improvement in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
> >
> >Issues fixed in 4.3
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
> >
> >Known Issues in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >
> >location):
> >
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
> >
> >
> >
> >PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> >
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> >Testing instructions are here:
> >
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+
> pro
> >ced
> >ure
> >
> >
> >
> >Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
> >5:00PM PST.
> >
> >
> >
> >For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> >
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
>
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-
> infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack
> Environments.
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-
> training/>
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil.
> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Alex Hitchins <al...@shapeblue.com>.
-1
As below - I don't think this can go out given it breaks API on a non-major release.
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitchins@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.angus@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 12:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
-1
See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)'
There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing an array of details i.e
details[0].key=<>&details[0].value=<>&details[1].key=<>&details[1].value=<>
I don't think this is fully understood (at least by me) or documented or fully discussed.
I haven't figured out if/how Cloudmonkey can pass it as a CLI command.
Regards
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.angus@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 11:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
Santhosh
________________________________________
From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
+1
Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <an...@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
>vote:
>
>
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r
>efs
>/heads/4.3
>Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
>List of changes:
>
><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
>links here for now>
>
>New Features in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
>Improvement in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
>Issues fixed in 4.3
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
>Known Issues in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
>location):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
>Testing instructions are here:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pro
>ced
>ure
>
>
>
>Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
>5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Animesh Chaturvedi <an...@citrix.com>.
Paul
Based on the response from Min and Devdeep IMO the compatibility is not broken. Do you have any more reason to keep a -1.
Thanks
Animesh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.angus@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> -1
>
> See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)'
>
> There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing
> an array of details i.e
>
> details[0].key=<>&details[0].value=<>&details[1].key=<>&details[1].value=
> <>
>
> I don't think this is fully understood (at least by me) or documented or fully
> discussed.
>
> I haven't figured out if/how Cloudmonkey can pass it as a CLI command.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com]
> Sent: 12 February 2014 11:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
>
> Santhosh
> ________________________________________
> From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
>
> +1
> Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Amogh
>
> On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> <an...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> >I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >
> >vote:
> >
> >
> >
> >Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r
> >efs
> >/heads/4.3
> >Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
> >
> >
> >List of changes:
> >
> ><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
> >links here for now>
> >
> >New Features in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
> >
> >Improvement in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
> >
> >Issues fixed in 4.3
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
> >
> >Known Issues in 4.3:
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >
> >location):
> >
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
> >
> >
> >
> >PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> >
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> >Testing instructions are here:
> >
> >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+
> pro
> >ced
> >ure
> >
> >
> >
> >Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
> >5:00PM PST.
> >
> >
> >
> >For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> >
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
>
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-
> infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack
> Environments.
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-
> training/>
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil.
> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-
> line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Paul Angus <pa...@shapeblue.com>.
-1
See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)'
There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing an array of details i.e
details[0].key=<>&details[0].value=<>&details[1].key=<>&details[1].value=<>
I don't think this is fully understood (at least by me) or documented or fully discussed.
I haven't figured out if/how Cloudmonkey can pass it as a CLI command.
Regards
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.edukulla@citrix.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 11:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
Santhosh
________________________________________
From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
+1
Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <an...@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
>vote:
>
>
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r
>efs
>/heads/4.3
>Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
>List of changes:
>
><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
>links here for now>
>
>New Features in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
>Improvement in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
>Issues fixed in 4.3
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
>Known Issues in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
>location):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
>Testing instructions are here:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pro
>ced
>ure
>
>
>
>Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
>5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Santhosh Edukulla <sa...@citrix.com>.
Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
Santhosh
________________________________________
From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
+1
Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <an...@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
>vote:
>
>
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.3
>Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
>List of changes:
>
><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
>links here for now>
>
>New Features in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
>Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
>Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
>Known Issues in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
>location):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
>Testing instructions are here:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced
>ure
>
>
>
>Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
>5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Amogh Vasekar <am...@citrix.com>.
+1
Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <an...@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
>vote:
>
>
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.3
>Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
>List of changes:
>
><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
>links here for now>
>
>New Features in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
>Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
>Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
>Known Issues in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
>location):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
>Testing instructions are here:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced
>ure
>
>
>
>Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
>5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Posted by Srikanteswararao Talluri <sr...@citrix.com>.
+1
On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #1191 and ##1192
--------
All the 5 failures are intermittent ssh related test script/env issues.
--------
Link to Test report:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1191/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1192/testReport/
--------
Total:97
Fail :5
Skip :2
--------
name pass fail skip
test_loadbalance/ 0 3 0
test_guest_vlan_range/ 1 0 0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0
test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0
test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0
test_scale_vm/ 1 0 0
test_ssvm/ 10 0 0
test_network/ 7 0 0
test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0
test_volumes/ 8 1 0
test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0
test_routers/ 9 0 0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0
test_network_acl/ 1 0 0
test_vm_life_cycle/ 10 0 0
test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0
test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0
test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0
test_global_settings/ 1 0 0
test_nic/ 1 0 0
test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0
test_iso/ 5 0 1
test_service_offerings/ 3 1 0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0
test_regions/ 1 0 0
test_templates/ 7 0 1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0
test_vm_snapshots/ 3 0 0
test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0
test_pvlan/ 1 0 0
--------
On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1189 and #1190
--------
4 of the 5 failures are invalid tests(snapthots and scale VM)
1 failure is intermittent ssh related test script/env issue.
--------
Link to Test report:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1189/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1190/testReport/
--------
Total:97
Fail :5
Skip :2
--------
name pass fail skip
test_loadbalance/ 3 0 0
test_guest_vlan_range/ 1 0 0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0
test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0
test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0
test_scale_vm/ 0 1 0
test_ssvm/ 10 0 0
test_network/ 6 1 0
test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0
test_volumes/ 9 0 0
test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0
test_routers/ 9 0 0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0
test_network_acl/ 1 0 0
test_vm_life_cycle/ 10 0 0
test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0
test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0
test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0
test_global_settings/ 1 0 0
test_nic/ 1 0 0
test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0
test_iso/ 5 0 1
test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0
test_regions/ 1 0 0
test_templates/ 7 0 1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0
test_vm_snapshots/ 0 3 0
test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0
test_pvlan/ 1 0 0
--------
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 08/02/14 6:21 am, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <an...@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>
>vote:
>
>
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.3
>Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
>
>
>List of changes:
>
><Release notes are still in progress in a different repo, so providing
>links here for now>
>
>New Features in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>
>Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>
>Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>
>Known Issues in 4.3:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>
>location):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>
>
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>
>
>Testing instructions are here:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced
>ure
>
>
>
>Vote will be open for 3 working days and will close on Wednesday 2/12
>5:00PM PST.
>
>
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>