You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-java@ibatis.apache.org by a b <eo...@yahoo.com> on 2006/02/09 07:00:14 UTC
ibastis mapping performance
hi, is there articles that compare the orm mappers out
there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get a
query result how long does it take to generate the
object, and what if the resultset is like a million of
records
thanks
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ibastis mapping performance
Posted by Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com>.
Or, you can link your IDE to the include iBATIS source code and step through
it to find out what is taking the time.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would recommend that you provide more detail on your situation.
> Statements like "mapping is taking quite a long time for us" do not
> provide us information that we can use to assist you. iBatis has been
> very performant for many users. So, if you can provide us with
> information on how you are using iBatis we will likely be able to
> identify where you are using iBatis incorrectly. I can assure you that
> it should not take a long time.
>
> Brandon
>
> On 2/9/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > the mapping is taking quite a long time for us that's
> > why i'm asking the question, just wondering has anyone
> > else encountered a similar problem
> >
> > --- Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm...I'll need to set up a template with a canned
> > > answer for this.
> > >
> > > Generic benchmarks are useless. You'll get full
> > > agreement from any open
> > > source team (like Hibernate), and you may get a
> > > mixed response from
> > > commercial vendors like oracle.
> > >
> > > The only benchmarks and tests that matter are those
> > > that you do in your own
> > > environment that adequately represent your needs.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Clinton
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of
> > > ORM frameworks.
> > > > However, iBatis would likely not be a part of
> > > that. We are not an
> > > > Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL
> > > Mapping framework and
> > > > value based. Not Table and Object ID based like
> > > ORM. That said... you
> > > > WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a
> > > "persistence" framework.
> > > >
> > > > Also, in what case would you be returning a
> > > million objects in a java
> > > > application?
> > > >
> > > > On 2/8/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > hi, is there articles that compare the orm
> > > mappers out
> > > > > there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get
> > > a
> > > > > query result how long does it take to generate
> > > the
> > > > > object, and what if the resultset is like a
> > > million of
> > > > > records
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
Re: ibastis mapping performance
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
I would recommend that you provide more detail on your situation.
Statements like "mapping is taking quite a long time for us" do not
provide us information that we can use to assist you. iBatis has been
very performant for many users. So, if you can provide us with
information on how you are using iBatis we will likely be able to
identify where you are using iBatis incorrectly. I can assure you that
it should not take a long time.
Brandon
On 2/9/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> the mapping is taking quite a long time for us that's
> why i'm asking the question, just wondering has anyone
> else encountered a similar problem
>
> --- Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm...I'll need to set up a template with a canned
> > answer for this.
> >
> > Generic benchmarks are useless. You'll get full
> > agreement from any open
> > source team (like Hibernate), and you may get a
> > mixed response from
> > commercial vendors like oracle.
> >
> > The only benchmarks and tests that matter are those
> > that you do in your own
> > environment that adequately represent your needs.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Clinton
> >
> >
> > On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of
> > ORM frameworks.
> > > However, iBatis would likely not be a part of
> > that. We are not an
> > > Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL
> > Mapping framework and
> > > value based. Not Table and Object ID based like
> > ORM. That said... you
> > > WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a
> > "persistence" framework.
> > >
> > > Also, in what case would you be returning a
> > million objects in a java
> > > application?
> > >
> > > On 2/8/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > hi, is there articles that compare the orm
> > mappers out
> > > > there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get
> > a
> > > > query result how long does it take to generate
> > the
> > > > object, and what if the resultset is like a
> > million of
> > > > records
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Re: ibastis mapping performance
Posted by a b <eo...@yahoo.com>.
the mapping is taking quite a long time for us that's
why i'm asking the question, just wondering has anyone
else encountered a similar problem
--- Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm...I'll need to set up a template with a canned
> answer for this.
>
> Generic benchmarks are useless. You'll get full
> agreement from any open
> source team (like Hibernate), and you may get a
> mixed response from
> commercial vendors like oracle.
>
> The only benchmarks and tests that matter are those
> that you do in your own
> environment that adequately represent your needs.
>
> Cheers,
> Clinton
>
>
> On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of
> ORM frameworks.
> > However, iBatis would likely not be a part of
> that. We are not an
> > Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL
> Mapping framework and
> > value based. Not Table and Object ID based like
> ORM. That said... you
> > WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a
> "persistence" framework.
> >
> > Also, in what case would you be returning a
> million objects in a java
> > application?
> >
> > On 2/8/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > hi, is there articles that compare the orm
> mappers out
> > > there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get
> a
> > > query result how long does it take to generate
> the
> > > object, and what if the resultset is like a
> million of
> > > records
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: ibastis mapping performance
Posted by Clinton Begin <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hmm...I'll need to set up a template with a canned answer for this.
Generic benchmarks are useless. You'll get full agreement from any open
source team (like Hibernate), and you may get a mixed response from
commercial vendors like oracle.
The only benchmarks and tests that matter are those that you do in your own
environment that adequately represent your needs.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 2/9/06, Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of ORM frameworks.
> However, iBatis would likely not be a part of that. We are not an
> Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL Mapping framework and
> value based. Not Table and Object ID based like ORM. That said... you
> WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a "persistence" framework.
>
> Also, in what case would you be returning a million objects in a java
> application?
>
> On 2/8/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > hi, is there articles that compare the orm mappers out
> > there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get a
> > query result how long does it take to generate the
> > object, and what if the resultset is like a million of
> > records
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
Re: ibastis mapping performance
Posted by Brandon Goodin <br...@gmail.com>.
I am not aware of a comprehensive comparison of ORM frameworks.
However, iBatis would likely not be a part of that. We are not an
Object-Relational-Mapping framework. We are SQL Mapping framework and
value based. Not Table and Object ID based like ORM. That said... you
WOULD be able to categorize us correctly as a "persistence" framework.
Also, in what case would you be returning a million objects in a java
application?
On 2/8/06, a b <eo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> hi, is there articles that compare the orm mappers out
> there for mapping performance? i.e. after i get a
> query result how long does it take to generate the
> object, and what if the resultset is like a million of
> records
>
> thanks
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>