Re: Trunk Rules Question

["Kevin A. McGrail" <km...@apache.org>]

Ok the revisions I made might (must) break things but we can powwow on it
tomorrow.

My thoughts are that everything ruleqa and promotion based should checkout
trunk not 3.4 branch.

With my move of the rules, I expect it should now break if it does
something needing that dir.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 17:40 Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 08/20/2018 03:53 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > On 8/20/2018 4:47 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> >> You are correct.  Only trunk is used for masscheck and ruleqa
> >> promotions so the rules do need to contain version checking.
> > OK, so 3.4 in SVN doesn't affect masscheck or ruleqa, right?  Nothing
> > svn check's out that branch or anything?
> >
>
> Well that's a slightly different question. :)
>
> 1. According to my wiki notes on the Infra 2017 Notes page, the
> ~/svn/trunk/build/mkupdates/run_nightly checks out the 3.4.2 to run the
> latest rules against for the daily "promotions validated" that gets
> emailed to the dev list.
>
> 2. The nitemc sets up the staging area for the massheckers to pull down
> via rsync.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/InfraNotes2017#nitemc
>
> Both items above may be fine to stay at 3.4.2 for a while but I wanted
> to point them out in case they need to be rev'd with the new release.
>
> Dave
>