You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@flex.apache.org by Mihai Chira <mi...@gmail.com> on 2014/08/11 18:39:18 UTC
Using mustella to test existing applications
There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
applications?"
I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
applications.
Thanks,
Mihai
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Saw it! Thanks. Looks like mustella on our CI hung before your changes
so I'm going to reboot the server now and we'll see if it passes.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 8/20/14 7:46 AM, "Darrell Loverin" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I recommitted the mustella changes to allow the test directory to be
>located outside of the mustella source:
>
>Branch: refs/heads/develop
>Commit: 1f8c801d33406b7f1f6119fe93788f0c30fd5c73
>Committed: Mon Aug 18 21:46:03 2014 -0400
>
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> It passed on my Windows box. If it fails again, download the bad.png
>>and
>> email it to me off-list.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 8/12/14 1:22 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today.
>> >
>> >Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad
>>bitmap,
>> >but the two files look the same to me :
>> >
>> >
>>
>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>/
>>
>>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>>>nt
>> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png
>> >
>>
>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>/
>>
>>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>>>nt
>> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>> >
>>
>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>/
>>
>>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>>>nt
>> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>> >
>> >I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the
>> >...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over
>>...runtimecss.png
>> >?
>> >
>> >Tom
>> >
>> >On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote:
>> >> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified
>>mustella
>> >>so
>> >> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
>> >>
>> >> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time
>>ago.
>> >> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the
>> >>changes
>> >> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Darrell
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
>> >>>
>> >>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the
>> >>>mustella
>> >>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts
>>of
>> >>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can
>> >>>work,
>> >>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is
>>this
>> >>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
>> >>>> applications?"
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing
>>existing
>> >>>> applications.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Mihai
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> >>service.
>> >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> >>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>> >
>>
>>
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Darrell Loverin <da...@gmail.com>.
I recommitted the mustella changes to allow the test directory to be
located outside of the mustella source:
Branch: refs/heads/develop
Commit: 1f8c801d33406b7f1f6119fe93788f0c30fd5c73
Committed: Mon Aug 18 21:46:03 2014 -0400
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> It passed on my Windows box. If it fails again, download the bad.png and
> email it to me off-list.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 8/12/14 1:22 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>
> >Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today.
> >
> >Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad bitmap,
> >but the two files look the same to me :
> >
> >
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
> >Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png
> >
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
> >Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
> >
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
> >Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
> >Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
> >
> >I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the
> >...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over ...runtimecss.png
> >?
> >
> >Tom
> >
> >On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> >> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified mustella
> >>so
> >> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
> >>
> >> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time ago.
> >> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the
> >>changes
> >> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Darrell
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
> >>>
> >>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the
> >>>mustella
> >>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
> >>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can
> >>>work,
> >>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
> >>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
> >>>> applications?"
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
> >>>> applications.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Mihai
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
> >>>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >>service.
> >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> ______________________________________________________________________
> >
>
>
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
It passed on my Windows box. If it fails again, download the bad.png and
email it to me off-list.
-Alex
On 8/12/14 1:22 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today.
>
>Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad bitmap,
>but the two files look the same to me :
>
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>
>I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the
>...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over ...runtimecss.png
>?
>
>Tom
>
>On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote:
>> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified mustella
>>so
>> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
>>
>> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time ago.
>> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the
>>changes
>> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
>>
>>
>> -Darrell
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
>>>
>>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the
>>>mustella
>>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
>>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can
>>>work,
>>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
>>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
>>>> applications?"
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
>>>> applications.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mihai
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
If there is an @win, then there is already a platform specific bitmap and
a new baseline should be generated from that platform. I'll run the test
on my Windows box tonight and see if it reproduces.
-Alex
On 8/12/14 1:22 AM, "Tom Chiverton" <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
>Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today.
>
>Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad bitmap,
>but the two files look the same to me :
>
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/
>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendant
>Selector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>
>I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the
>...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over ...runtimecss.png
>?
>
>Tom
>
>On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote:
>> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified mustella
>>so
>> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
>>
>> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time ago.
>> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the
>>changes
>> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
>>
>>
>> -Darrell
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
>>>
>>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the
>>>mustella
>>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
>>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can
>>>work,
>>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
>>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
>>>> applications?"
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
>>>> applications.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mihai
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>>service.
>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Well, it certainty seems to have hung again today.
Before that AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS had a bad bitmap,
but the two files look the same to me :
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss.png
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
I've not seen the '@win' on the end before. Should I copy the
...@win.png.bad.png over the top of ...@win.png or over ...runtimecss.png ?
Tom
On 11/08/14 22:01, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified mustella so
> the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
>
> I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time ago.
> I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the changes
> again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
>
>
> -Darrell
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
>>
>> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the mustella
>> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
>> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can work,
>> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
>>> just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
>>> applications?"
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
>>> applications.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mihai
>>>
>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Darrell Loverin <da...@gmail.com>.
I've been using mustella to test my own components. I modified mustella so
the tests do not have to be created in the tests directory.
I fixed the problem that caused me to revert the changes some time ago.
I've been waiting for a clean run of mustella before I commit the changes
again. I haven't seen a clean mustella run in a very long time.
-Darrell
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
>
> Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the mustella
> folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
> Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can work,
> and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
> >just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
> >applications?"
> >
> >I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
> >applications.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Mihai
> >
> >[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview
>
>
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Mihai Chira <mi...@gmail.com>.
>
> Yes, you can try using it if you want.
Just to ask again before I do a test next week: has anyone else tried
to run mustella on an AIR application with a more complex UI than,
say, a couple components?
Re: Using mustella to test existing applications
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Yes, you can try using it if you want.
Darrell was trying to make it easier to run tests outside of the mustella
folder, but it broke something and he stopped trying. We use parts of
Mustella to run tests as part of the checkintests so I know it can work,
and FlexJS uses mustella as well.
-Alex
On 8/11/14 9:39 AM, "Mihai Chira" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>There is a comment on the mustella overview page[1] that asks "Is this
>just for testing the SDK, or can I also use it to test my own
>applications?"
>
>I'd like to ask the same - or if it can be adapted to testing existing
>applications.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Mihai
>
>[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview