You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2017/08/29 09:16:58 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Hi folks!
I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
Bug
• [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
• [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
• [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
• [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
• [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
• [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
• [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
• [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
• [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
Task
• [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
The staging repo can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
The source release is under
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
Please VOTE
[+1] go for it!
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
The VOTE is open for 72h
txs and LieGrue,
strub
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
Glad you found it finally and thanks for voting!
Next tasks on the list is to continue with OpenJPA-3.0.0 and TomEE8 :)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.09.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
>
> I dreamt it?
>
>
> On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Glad you found it finally and thanks for voting!
Next tasks on the list is to continue with OpenJPA-3.0.0 and TomEE8 :)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.09.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
>
> I dreamt it?
>
>
> On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time
tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
I dreamt it?
On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard
> Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.INVALID
> >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in
> 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time
tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
I dreamt it?
On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard
> Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.INVALID
> >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in
> 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
Hi lords & ladies!
The VOTE has passed with the following
+1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
no -1 nor 0 got received.
I'll continue with the release steps.
Should hit maven.central shortly..
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Reinhard Sandtner <re...@gmail.com>.
+1
lg
reini
> Am 31.08.2017 um 08:34 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 30.08.2017 um 03:11 schrieb John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Looks good to me, ship it +1
>>
>> Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine at this point.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
>>> CDI-2.0 implementation.
>>> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
>>> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>>>
>>> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
>>> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>>>
>>> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>>>
>>> Bug
>>> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
>>> default
>>> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
>>> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
>>> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
>>> if not decorated with @Dependent
>>> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
>>> Extension Observers
>>> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
>>> CDI.current()
>>> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
>>> automatically enabled
>>> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
>>> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
>>> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
>>> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
>>> blow up with a NPE
>>> Task
>>> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>>>
>>>
>>> The staging repo can be found here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>>>
>>> The source release is under
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>>>
>>>
>>> Please VOTE
>>>
>>> [+1] go for it!
>>> [+0] meh, don't care
>>> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>>>
>>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>>>
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 30.08.2017 um 03:11 schrieb John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
>
> Looks good to me, ship it +1
>
> Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine at this point.
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
>> CDI-2.0 implementation.
>> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
>> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>>
>> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
>> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>>
>> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>>
>> Bug
>> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
>> default
>> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
>> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
>> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
>> if not decorated with @Dependent
>> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
>> Extension Observers
>> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
>> CDI.current()
>> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
>> automatically enabled
>> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
>> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
>> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
>> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
>> blow up with a NPE
>> Task
>> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>>
>>
>> The staging repo can be found here:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>>
>> The source release is under
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>>
>>
>> Please VOTE
>>
>> [+1] go for it!
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>>
>> The VOTE is open for 72h
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Looks good to me, ship it +1
Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine at this point.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1, thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Hi lords & ladies!
The VOTE has passed with the following
+1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
no -1 nor 0 got received.
I'll continue with the release steps.
Should hit maven.central shortly..
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Looks good to me, ship it +1
Tested with Hammock + Geronimo Config, both passing fine at this point.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:17 AM Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1, thanks Mark
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
+1
thanks.
On 01/09/2017 11:24, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
> 2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de
> <ma...@yahoo.de>>:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which
> is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in
> 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a
> few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the
> upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be
> true by default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly
> for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in
> annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint
> for CDI Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance
> behind CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true
> should not be automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation
> of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with
> private ct blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/>
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/>
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-08-29 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2)
> and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>