[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16341) Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"

["Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15419130#comment-15419130 ] 

Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-16341 at 8/12/16 5:01 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

+1

Curious if this would now be seen as a compat issue on branches < branch-1. [~busbey] [~mantonov]? 


was (Author: apurtell):
+1

Curious if this would now be seen as a compat issue on branches < branch-1. [~busbey] ? 

> Missing bit on "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16341
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16341
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rpc
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>         Attachments: HBASE-16341.patch, HBASE-16341.patch
>
>
> [~larsgeorge] found a missing bit in HBASE-15971 "Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98" Let me fix here. Let me quote the man:
> {code}
> BTW, in constructor we do this
> ```    String callQueueType = conf.get(CALL_QUEUE_TYPE_CONF_KEY,
>         CALL_QUEUE_TYPE_FIFO_CONF_VALUE);
> ```
> (edited)
> [8:19]  
> but in `onConfigurationChange()` we do
> ```    String callQueueType = conf.get(CALL_QUEUE_TYPE_CONF_KEY,
>       CALL_QUEUE_TYPE_DEADLINE_CONF_VALUE);
> ```
> (edited)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)