You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/01 15:11:25 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5296) Add DirectDocValuesFormat

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13811269#comment-13811269 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5296:
------------------------------------

Now that we have this codec, does it make sense to keep FacetDVF? As far as I can tell, the only difference is that FacetDVF keeps the addresses as PackedInts while DirectDVF as int[]?

> Add DirectDocValuesFormat
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5296
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 4.6, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5296.patch
>
>
> Indexes values to disk but at search time it loads/accesses the values via simple java arrays (i.e. no compression).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org