You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org> on 2003/08/28 12:49:36 UTC
jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
Hi to all,
Still working on finding why iSeries couldn't use Unix98 def in_addr_t.
BTW, what about adding ipv6 support in jk_connect.c by using inet_pton
instead of inet_addr ?
I'd like to have replies from people who have differents OS to know if
they have support for inet_pton...
Regards
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Bill Barker a écrit :
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
> Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
>
>
>
>>FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
>>and glibc 2.1.
>
>
> And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-).
Some old production systems are still in RH 6.2 ;)
And I was still using RH 7.2 on my developpment machine 5 weeks ago
> I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script.
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
> FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
> and glibc 2.1.
And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-).
I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script.
>
> Should we also fix this case ?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Henri Gomez a écrit :
> Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
>
>> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
>> pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think
>> we are ready for another test source dist.
>
>
> We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
> I'll take a look at it right now.
>
> BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it
I take a look at configure.in and if I know how to see if inet_pton
exist via AC_CHECK_FUNCS, I don't know how to determine for in_addr_t.
Jean-Frederic may help us here since it's our resident configure guru
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@mail.more.net>.
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
>
>> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
>> pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think
>> we are ready for another test source dist.
>
>
> We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
> I'll take a look at it right now.
>
> BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it
>
OK, so are we ready for a test source release?
Glenn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen glenn@more.net | /* Spelin donut madder |
MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. |
Missouri Research and Education Network | */ |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
> FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
> pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think
> we are ready for another test source dist.
We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available.
I'll take a look at it right now.
BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@mail.more.net>.
FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold
pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think
we are ready for another test source dist.
Thanks,
Glenn
Henri Gomez wrote:
> FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
> and glibc 2.1.
>
> Should we also fix this case ?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
and glibc 2.1.
Should we also fix this case ?
Error in jk 1.2.5
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
if mod_jk.c, apr_strdup() is used.
But it should be :
apr_pstrdup ?
Re: jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
Posted by Henri Gomez <hg...@apache.org>.
Glenn Nielsen a écrit :
> Henri,
>
> Can this wait until after the mod_jk 1.2.5 release?
>
> BTW, int inet_pton(int af, const char *cp, void *addr);
> is available in both Solaris 7 and 8.
>
> And on FreeBSD 4.8 it is defined as:
> int inet_pton __P((int, const char *, void *));
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
Ok, we could wait delay this for jk 1.2.6 ?
BTW, I finished with iSeries and Unix98 compat problems,
so you could tag it when you want.
I'm now fixing some cast and it will be ready for release.
Re: jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
Posted by Glenn Nielsen <gl...@mail.more.net>.
Henri,
Can this wait until after the mod_jk 1.2.5 release?
BTW, int inet_pton(int af, const char *cp, void *addr);
is available in both Solaris 7 and 8.
And on FreeBSD 4.8 it is defined as:
int inet_pton __P((int, const char *, void *));
Regards,
Glenn
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Still working on finding why iSeries couldn't use Unix98 def in_addr_t.
>
> BTW, what about adding ipv6 support in jk_connect.c by using inet_pton
> instead of inet_addr ?
>
> I'd like to have replies from people who have differents OS to know if
> they have support for inet_pton...
>
> Regards
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Re: jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
Posted by NormW <no...@bocnet.com.au>.
Good morning.
Found:
int inet_pton ( long af, const char *cp, void *ap );
in NetWare LibC...FWIW.
Norm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
> Hi to all,
>
> Still working on finding why iSeries couldn't use Unix98 def in_addr_t.
>
> BTW, what about adding ipv6 support in jk_connect.c by using inet_pton
> instead of inet_addr ?
>
> I'd like to have replies from people who have differents OS to know if
> they have support for inet_pton...
>
> Regards
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: jk 1.2.5 and ipv6
Posted by Kurt Miller <tr...@optonline.net>.
It is supported on OpenBSD.
int inet_pton(int, const char *, void *);
Regards,
-Kurt
From: "Henri Gomez" <hg...@apache.org>
> Hi to all,
>
> Still working on finding why iSeries couldn't use Unix98 def in_addr_t.
>
> BTW, what about adding ipv6 support in jk_connect.c by using inet_pton
> instead of inet_addr ?
>
> I'd like to have replies from people who have differents OS to know if
> they have support for inet_pton...
>
> Regards
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>