You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> on 2012/09/21 03:52:47 UTC
serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3CAANLkTimjWQIfCMsS3B6s2gWVRKyGLct2-BD6b-JIZN2a@mail.gmail.com%3E
Is there a particular reason we're still shipping such an ancient
version of serf?
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
On 09/27/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
>> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
>
> Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
> going forward? Based on what Greg said I don't think there's any
> technical reason not to. If not I'll be doing so with 1.7.7.
>
> If we do another 1.6 release we probably should use 0.7, since 1.6's
> serf.m4 doesn't know about major 1 of serf.
IIRC, we don't do 'deps' for 1.7 and beyond.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought we did not have a deps package with the 1.7.x releases?
Nevermind then. :D
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
>> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
>
> Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
> going forward? Based on what Greg said I don't think there's any
> technical reason not to. If not I'll be doing so with 1.7.7.
I thought we did not have a deps package with the 1.7.x releases?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
> believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
going forward? Based on what Greg said I don't think there's any
technical reason not to. If not I'll be doing so with 1.7.7.
If we do another 1.6 release we probably should use 0.7, since 1.6's
serf.m4 doesn't know about major 1 of serf.
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 21, 2012 5:12 AM, "Branko Čibej" <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
> On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> >> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> >> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> > According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
> > tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Linux (ran
> > into problems on Windows but I don't think it's because of serf
> > itself).
>
> I tested with 1.1.0 on Mac OS, too. That's not implying that our
> testsuite is comprehensive enough to catch possible incompatibilities in
> edge cases.
If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
Cheers,
-g
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com>.
On 21.09.2012 10:29, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
> tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Linux (ran
> into problems on Windows but I don't think it's because of serf
> itself).
I tested with 1.1.0 on Mac OS, too. That's not implying that our
testsuite is comprehensive enough to catch possible incompatibilities in
edge cases.
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Johan Corveleyn <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
>> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
>> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
>
> According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
> tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Linux (ran
> into problems on Windows but I don't think it's because of serf
> itself).
Yes, I use serf 0.7.1 for building 1.6.x (I stopped using the -deps
file some time ago, when I had problems with building ... and switched
to using a set of local dependencies).
I build 1.7 (and trunk) with serf 1.1.0, but for some reason this
didn't work for me with 1.6 (linker problems IIRC). I didn't have that
much time to investigate further, and when I tried with serf 0.7.1 it
seemed to work fine, so I went with that.
--
Johan
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
> ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on OS X and Linux (ran
into problems on Windows but I don't think it's because of serf
itself).
Re: serf in subversion-deps-1.6.*.zip
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:52:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
> fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3CAANLkTimjWQIfCMsS3B6s2gWVRKyGLct2-BD6b-JIZN2a@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Is there a particular reason we're still shipping such an ancient
> version of serf?
The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.