You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Pascal Schumacher (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/08 18:44:04 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-3387) Add @Use Annotation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14618852#comment-14618852 ]
Pascal Schumacher edited comment on GROOVY-3387 at 7/8/15 4:43 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Closing this as it did get only negative comments.
was (Author: pascalschumacher):
Closing this as it did not get only negative comments.
> Add @Use Annotation
> -------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-3387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3387
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ast builder
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Mingfai Ma
> Priority: Minor
>
> it is obviously that many ppl think it is a good idea and want it to exist. let's vote!
> reference - the discussion in Oct 08
> http://marc.info/?l=groovy-dev&m=122392529002672&w=2
> http://www.nabble.com/%40Use-ast-transformation-td19953881.html
> my view:
> - too many diff ways to do the same thing? obsolete the old "use(){}" usage
> - too many AST annotation? discard some other less popular one
> - "@Use annotation would be less granular than use() / backward compatiability"? so mark the old usage as obsolete but still support it and remove it in 2.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)