You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Pascal Schumacher (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/08 18:44:04 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-3387) Add @Use Annotation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14618852#comment-14618852 ] 

Pascal Schumacher edited comment on GROOVY-3387 at 7/8/15 4:43 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Closing this as it did get only negative comments.


was (Author: pascalschumacher):
Closing this as it did not get only negative comments.

> Add @Use Annotation
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-3387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3387
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ast builder
>    Affects Versions: 1.6
>            Reporter: Mingfai Ma
>            Priority: Minor
>
> it is obviously that many ppl think it is a good idea and want it to exist. let's vote!
> reference - the discussion in Oct 08
> http://marc.info/?l=groovy-dev&m=122392529002672&w=2
> http://www.nabble.com/%40Use-ast-transformation-td19953881.html
> my view:
> - too many diff ways to do the same thing? obsolete the old "use(){}" usage
> - too many AST annotation? discard some other less popular one
> - "@Use annotation would be less granular than use() / backward compatiability"?  so mark the old usage as obsolete but still support it and remove it in 2.0. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)