You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by ni...@apache.org on 2006/05/07 16:52:21 UTC

svn commit: r404776 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS

Author: niq
Date: Sun May  7 07:52:17 2006
New Revision: 404776

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=404776&view=rev
Log:
Vote&promote (and fix typo while we're at it)

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES?rev=404776&r1=404775&r2=404776&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES [utf-8] (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES [utf-8] Sun May  7 07:52:17 2006
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
      PR 38793. [Ruediger Pluem, matthias <mk-asf gigacodes.de>]
 
   *) core: Prevent reading uninitialized memory while reading a line of
-     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent.com.br>]
+     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent com br>]
 
   *) mod_dbd: Update defaults, improve error reporting.
      [Chris Darroch <chrisd pearsoncmg com>, Nick Kew]

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=404776&r1=404775&r2=404776&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sun May  7 07:52:17 2006
@@ -76,6 +76,17 @@
 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
 
+    * Remove odd DECLINED code from mod_charset_lite filter.
+      http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399665&view=rev
+      +1 trawick, rpluem, niq
+      niq: This is right, but the underlying behaviour (refuse to
+      work in a proxy) is bad.  There's a TODO.
+
+    * mod_charset_lite: Don't go through the motions of translating if
+      the source and dest charsets are the same.
+      http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399668&view=rev
+      +1 trawick, rpluem, niq
+
 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
 
     * Backport mod_authz_dbd (it's had some testing now)
@@ -88,15 +99,6 @@
       PR#39386
       http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=396310&view=rev
       +1 niq
-
-    * Remove odd DECLINED code from mod_charset_lite filter.
-      http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399665&view=rev
-      +1 trawick, rpluem
-
-    * mod_charset_lite: Don't go through the motions of translating if
-      the source and dest charsets are the same.
-      http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399668&view=rev
-      +1 trawick, rpluem
 
     * mod_mem_cache: Add Content-Type to headers_out if not already set.
       PR 39266.



Re: svn commit: r404776 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS

Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:08, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 05/07/2006 04:52 PM,  wrote:
> > Author: niq
> >
> >
> >    *) core: Prevent reading uninitialized memory while reading a line of
> > -     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent.com.br>]
> > +     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent com br>]
>
> Just curious: Why did you remove the dots? So far we have only removed the
> '@' in email addresses. Is there a new policy on that?

Most of them are dotless.  I had committed that one with dots, then removed
them locally but thought it too trivial to commit.  So when I had something
else to commit that doesn't call for anything like an arduous review,
I just let that tag along.

-- 
Nick Kew

Re: svn commit: r404776 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS

Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.

On 05/07/2006 04:52 PM,  wrote:
> Author: niq

>  
>    *) core: Prevent reading uninitialized memory while reading a line of
> -     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent.com.br>]
> +     protocol input.  PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut <davi haxent com br>]

Just curious: Why did you remove the dots? So far we have only removed the '@' in email addresses.
Is there a new policy on that?

Regards

RĂ¼diger