You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Nathan Mittler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/07/10 17:06:00 UTC

[jira] Commented: (AMQCPP-188) ActiveMQ message consumer waiting for receive to complete is not closing...

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44172#action_44172 ] 

Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-188:
---------------------------------------

I've applied the change to trunk - many thanks!

My guess as to why this was missing is simply because we weren't fully considering the use case...  

The JMS spec (CMS is just a port of JMS to C++), indicates that a session and all resources from that session are to be used from a single thread context.  This would mean that in the pure JMS case, it wouldn't be recommended to close() a consumer from a different thread than you're synchronous consumer (receive()).  

ActiveMQ-CPP tends to be a bit more liberal with how the consumers can be used, however, and what you were trying to do should work - but apparently there were some bits missing.

I'll close this issue after I've done some testing.

> ActiveMQ message consumer waiting for receive to complete is not closing...
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQCPP-188
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-188
>             Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CMS Impl
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>         Environment: Windows
>            Reporter: Rakesh
>            Assignee: Nathan Mittler
>             Fix For: 2.2.1
>
>
> I have a created an application which creates a connection and consumers using ActiveMQ C++ Client, after running the application consumer is waiting for the recive to complete. when we shutdown the application we close the connection, but close call of connection does not notify all the consumers (who is waiting for the message to be recived). 
> I have seen in the close method of ActiveMQConsumer after purging all the messages there is no call to notifyAll on object unconsumedMessages because of which consumers waiting for the receive does not does not come out of the wait call, which is causing our application not to shutdown.
> we modified the close call the notify all the consumers after purging all the unconsumed mesages and our application is working fine.
> Following is the changes that i have made in ActiveMQConsumer.cpp class
> void ActiveMQConsumer::close(){
> ....
> ....
>             // Purge all the pending messages
>             try{
>                 purgeMessages();
>             } catch ( ActiveMQException& ex ){
>                 if( !haveException ){
>                     ex.setMark( __FILE__, __LINE__ );
>                     error = ex;
>                     haveException = true;
>                 }
>             }
>          //Start of additional code
>          synchronized( &unconsumedMessages )
>          {
>                 unconsumedMessages.notifyAll();
>          }
>          //End of additional code
> ....
> ....
> }
> can anyone let me know why this has not been done? I think this should be done. please explain if I am missing something

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.