You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2008/05/12 17:41:57 UTC
[DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
process but I'll follow that up in another note.
Joe
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
No (as far as I know of). Let's get the samples released! And let me
know if you need help with that.
Thanks,
Jarek
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>
> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>
> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>
> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>
> Joe
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>
>> Also, I think we should just release samples for the 2.1.1 release (no
>> need to release samples for 2.1 in my opinion).
>>
>
> I was thinking the opposite ... release the samples for 2.1 and then attempt
> to leverage them in server 2.1.1 without a 2.1.1 release of samples.
> Assuming we get a solution as David suggests we could then potentially
> employ that solution for future 2.1.x releases.
>
My point is to get samples out ASAP for the latest official Geronimo
release. We are long overdue with releasing the samples. If we want to
work on getting 2.1 samples to work on any 2.1.x release, that's fine,
we can do that but that should not delay the 2.1.1 users from using
the samples.
Jarek
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com>.
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> Also, I think we should just release samples for the 2.1.1 release (no
>> need to release samples for 2.1 in my opinion).
>>
>
> I was thinking the opposite ... release the samples for 2.1 and then
> attempt to leverage them in server 2.1.1 without a 2.1.1 release of
> samples. Assuming we get a solution as David suggests we could then
> potentially employ that solution for future 2.1.x releases.
>
Agreed. It would be nice to see a samples release have a longevity of a
few minor releases. For example, samples 2.1 release working for all
2.1.x releases.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Also, I think we should just release samples for the 2.1.1 release (no
> need to release samples for 2.1 in my opinion).
>
I was thinking the opposite ... release the samples for 2.1 and then
attempt to leverage them in server 2.1.1 without a 2.1.1 release of
samples. Assuming we get a solution as David suggests we could then
potentially employ that solution for future 2.1.x releases.
Joe
> Jarek
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>>
>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>>
>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
>> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>
>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
Also, I think we should just release samples for the 2.1.1 release (no
need to release samples for 2.1 in my opinion).
Jarek
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>
> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>
> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>
> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>
> Joe
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> What about Daytrader? It's been dormant except for one update since
> last Oct. and is still at version 2.0-SNAPSHOT....
Good point. My main motivation on the samples was to get something out
there for Geronimo 2.1 which I think is long overdue. However, it would
appear that daytrader is even more overdue.
>
> Should we move it over into Samples, so it gets updated and released
> with the samples?
We should get some more input on this. I don't recall all of the
reasons that daytrader was moved into it's own subproject. However, I
have to admit that I'm hesitant to include it in samples prior to a 2.1
samples release because I'm afraid it will make it next to impossible to
get something out soon.
Joe
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>>>
>>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
>>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release
>>> process).
>>>
>>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release
>>> the 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>>
>>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
>>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>
>> BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
>> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are
>> correct, etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state
>> of the samples. Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some
>> reason that a particular sample under branches/2.1 should not be
>> released at all?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
What about Daytrader? It's been dormant except for one update since
last Oct. and is still at version 2.0-SNAPSHOT....
Should we move it over into Samples, so it gets updated and released
with the samples?
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>>
>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release
>> process).
>>
>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release
>> the 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>
>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
> etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the
> samples. Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that
> a particular sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
>
> Joe
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Ted Kirby wrote:
> I'd like to get G4009 in if possible. I have provided a patch to fix
> some HTML errors and warnings, although the sample runs without this
> patch.
>
Thanks Ted. I'll take a look at the patch.
Joe
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>>> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
>> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>>> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
>> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>>> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
>> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>> BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
>> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
>> etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the samples.
>> Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that a particular
>> sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Ted Kirby <te...@gmail.com>.
I'd like to get G4009 in if possible. I have provided a patch to fix
some HTML errors and warnings, although the sample runs without this
patch.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
> >
> > I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
> >
> > Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
> >
> > I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
>
> BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
> references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
> etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the samples.
> Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that a particular
> sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
>
> Joe
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Ready to release Geronimo 2.1 samples?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Is there any reason not to release the current Geronimo 2.1 samples
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1)?
>
> I'd be glad to work to get a release candidate created for this (I've
> already done some prep to get things updated for the new release process).
>
> Once we get the 2.1 Samples released we can turn around and release the
> 2.1.1 samples and then I think we'll finally be "up to date".
>
> I have some questions about how we might accomplish this via the new
> process but I'll follow that up in another note.
>
> Joe
>
BTW, I know that there are cleanup things to be done (like removing
references to snapshots, and ensuring license, notice files are correct,
etc....). I was more looking for input regarding the state of the
samples. Are some samples flat-out broken or is there some reason that
a particular sample under branches/2.1 should not be released at all?
Joe