You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> on 2008/08/27 20:16:18 UTC
[DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
the Security page -
http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
"compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
before we cut the branch and start the release process?
-Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Yep, just realized that this morning. Thanks for the reminder to add it
to the Release Status page.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Donald,
>
> I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1
> (alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but
> that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love
> to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck
> runs.
>
> Joe
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for
>> a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
>> on the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Donald,
I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1
(alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but
that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love
to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck runs.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Donald,
I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1
(alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but
that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love
to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck runs.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
I meant geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.6
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> The 2.1.3 release branch has been updated to use the released -
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.4
> genesis-1.3.1
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for
>> a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
>> on the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
The 2.1.3 release branch has been updated to use the released -
geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.4
genesis-1.3.1
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Here is what is done as of Rev693682 which will be used to create RC1:
- branches/2.1.3 updated to version=2.1.3
- mvn rat:check run on source and generated artifacts/assemblies
- RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.3 updated
- Release Status page udpated -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status
- Release notes added to 2.1 Docs -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/RELEASE-NOTES-2.1.3.TXT
- Component Versions table in 2.1 Docs updated for 2.1.3 -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/What+changed+in+2.1
I'll start the vote and discuss threads tomorrow morning, as soon as I
have all of the artifacts on the staging site.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
OK, I included G4271 on the Release Status page.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for
>> a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
>> on the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
> Right, I think it's important to get these in given that we'd like to
> release samples based on Geronimo 2.1.2 and ideally they should also run
> on 2.1.3. This might also let us run other plugins that have previously
> been released.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
Right, I think it's important to get these in given that we'd like to
release samples based on Geronimo 2.1.2 and ideally they should also run
on 2.1.3. This might also let us run other plugins that have previously
been released.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Actually, the sooner the better, since 2.1.3 should be focused on
getting security fixes out ASAP.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Cool! We could wait till next week to spin a release if you're
> expecting more JIRAs to fix in the next few days....
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>> Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release...
>> Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out
>> for a vote by end of day tomorrow.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>>
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>> OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
>>>>> 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
>>>>> snapshots.
>>>>>
>>>>> When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
>>>> I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release
>>>> version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new
>>>> problem found right after we've created a new release. It would be
>>>> better to hold off on this until we've got a clear target release
>>>> date for a Geronimo release that will include the new version.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and
>>>>>>> preparing for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are
>>>>>>> listed on the Security page -
>>>>>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3
>>>>>>> are Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in
>>>>>>> 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>>>> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to
>>>>>> consider picking up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Cool! We could wait till next week to spin a release if you're
expecting more JIRAs to fix in the next few days....
-Donald
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release...
> Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out
> for a vote by end of day tomorrow.
>
> Rick
>
>
>>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>> OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
>>>> 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
>>>> snapshots.
>>>>
>>>> When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
>>> I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release
>>> version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem
>>> found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to
>>> hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a
>>> Geronimo release that will include the new version.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Donald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing
>>>>>> for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are
>>>>>> listed on the Security page -
>>>>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>>>>>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in
>>>>>> 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>>> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to
>>>>> consider picking up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Donald
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release...
Ok, I'll start the release process. I should be able to get this out
for a vote by end of day tomorrow.
Rick
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status
>
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>> OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
>>> 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
>>> snapshots.
>>>
>>> When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
>> I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release
>> version? I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem
>> found right after we've created a new release. It would be better to
>> hold off on this until we've got a clear target release date for a
>> Geronimo release that will include the new version.
>>
>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing
>>>>> for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are
>>>>> listed on the Security page -
>>>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>>>>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in
>>>>> 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to
>>>> consider picking up.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Donald
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Target is Sept. 15 for the Geronimo 2.1.3 release...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.3+Release+Status
-Donald
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
>> 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
>> snapshots.
>>
>> When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
> I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version?
> I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right
> after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on
> this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release
> that will include the new version.
>
> Rick
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing
>>>> for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>>
>>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>>
>>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are
>>>> listed on the Security page -
>>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>>>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in
>>>> 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider
>>> picking up.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
> 1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
> snapshots.
>
> When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
I guess the real question is how soon do we need a new release version?
I would hate to do this too soon only to have a new problem found right
after we've created a new release. It would be better to hold off on
this until we've got a clear target release date for a Geronimo release
that will include the new version.
Rick
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing
>>> for a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>
>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>
>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are
>>> listed on the Security page -
>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in
>>> 2.1.3 before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider
>> picking up.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
OK, opened GERONIMO-4272 to upgrade 2.1 and 2.2 to the latest
1.6-SNAPSHOT code, published an updated Javamail Spec and Javamail
snapshots.
When can you start cutting the Javamail release?
-Donald
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for
>> a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
>> on the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
>> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
> There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider
> picking up.
>
> Rick
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for
> a Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
> on the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are
> Joe's "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
There was a recent flurry of javamail fixes we might want to consider
picking up.
Rick
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hi Donald,
Looks like all the big ones that popped up have been dealt with. I'll run
the RC through whenever it's ready.
Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> We rolled back to OpenJPA 1.0.3 yesterday, due to TCK failures with the
> newer 1.2.0 release. As soon as Jason W. verifies that most of the problems
> he was seeing are gone, I'll publish a RC1 for everyone to start looking at.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
>> the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>
--
~Jason Warner
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com>.
We rolled back to OpenJPA 1.0.3 yesterday, due to TCK failures with the
newer 1.2.0 release. As soon as Jason W. verifies that most of the
problems he was seeing are gone, I'll publish a RC1 for everyone to
start looking at.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
As listed in the Release Status/Plan for 2.1.3, the release branch has
been created at -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.3
The existing branches/2.1 has been updated to be -
version=2.1.4-SNAPSHOT
If there are any critical user fixes (like connector fail-over or memory
leak bugs) you still have until next Tuesday afternoon (3 PM ET) to
include them in 2.1.3. Just reply to this thread, so we can discuss any
potential release impacts.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
On second thought, lets not include this in 2.1.3, since it should be
focused on getting security fixes out ASAP.
But, I would be for including it in the 2.1.4-SNAPSHOT stream.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes
> and update the 2.1 Docs?
> Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)?
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
>> I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet -
>> check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such
>> as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by
>> deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web
>> services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example.
>> I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3?
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>
>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>
>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed
>>> on the
>>> Security page -
>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>>> before
>>> we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
As you mentioned, 2.1.3 is supposed to be security fixes so I guess I
won't look at port it back to 2.1.3. I'll look at pull it back to
2.1.x after 2.1.3 is released. Thanks
Lin
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes and
> update the 2.1 Docs?
> Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)?
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet -
>> check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such
>> as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by
>> deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web
>> services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example.
>> I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3?
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>
>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>
>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
>>> the
>>> Security page -
>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>>> before
>>> we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes
and update the 2.1 Docs?
Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)?
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
> I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet -
> check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such
> as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by
> deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web
> services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example.
> I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3?
>
> Lin
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the
>> Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before
>> we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet -
check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such
as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by
deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web
services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example.
I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3?
Lin
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on the
> Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 before
> we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
The following prerequisites for the 2.1.3 Server release are currently
undergoing release voting -
- Javamail_1.4-1.6
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-javamail-spec-%281.5%29-and-javamail-provider-%281.6%29-tt19212820s134.html
- Genesis-1.3.1
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Genesis-1.3.1-tt19225454s134.html
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Sounds like good suggestions to make in the 2.1.4 and 2.2 code branches.
-Donald
Ted Kirby wrote:
> A comment on release notes: As Jarek suggested earlier, I'd like to
> change the wording of the System Requirements in the Release Notes
> from:
>
> You need a platform that supports the Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5.0+) or greater.
>
> to
>
> Java J2SE 1.5.0 or greater, and a platform that supports it.
>
> In the README.txt, I'd like to see GEP mentioned, especially in the
> Application Development section. GEP may also be used to start the
> server.
>
> These changes would be for after 2.1.3.
>
> Our SVN seems down now, otherwise I'd make some updates.
>
> Comments?
>
> Ted
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> RC1 has been posted and a Vote started.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>>
>>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>>
>>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
>>> the Security page -
>>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>>
>>>
>>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Ted Kirby <te...@gmail.com>.
A comment on release notes: As Jarek suggested earlier, I'd like to
change the wording of the System Requirements in the Release Notes
from:
You need a platform that supports the Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5.0+) or greater.
to
Java J2SE 1.5.0 or greater, and a platform that supports it.
In the README.txt, I'd like to see GEP mentioned, especially in the
Application Development section. GEP may also be used to start the
server.
These changes would be for after 2.1.3.
Our SVN seems down now, otherwise I'd make some updates.
Comments?
Ted
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> RC1 has been posted and a Vote started.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>>
>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>>
>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
>> the Security page -
>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>>
>>
>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
>> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>>
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1.3 release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
RC1 has been posted and a Vote started.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a
> Geronimo 2.1.3 release.
>
> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html
>
> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on
> the Security page -
> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html
>
>
> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's
> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes.
>
>
> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3
> before we cut the branch and start the release process?
>
>
>
> -Donald