You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> on 2015/01/22 21:19:15 UTC

Adding a builder for Tamaya

Dear all,

in the last (really the last?) hangout Anatole and I discussed the 
problem of configuring a Configuration manually. We would like to see an 
builder module in the modules section of Tamaya for this.

I would like to add this before closing the feature list for 0.1.

Any objections?

Bye,

Oliver

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
Hi Werner,

I going to add a separate ConfigurationBuilder to the builder module. I 
think it should be currently totally independ of all other modules as it 
is an extension.

Oliver

Am 23.01.15 um 11:52 schrieb Werner Keil:
> Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now?
> Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of
> type?
>
> Werner
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>
>> I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>
>> Viele Grüße
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>
>> --
>> N Oliver B. Fischer
>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>> P +49 30 44793251
>> M +49 178 7903538
>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>> S oliver.b.fischer
>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>> X http://xing.to/obf
>>
>>

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
Yes and no. As I sad Tamaya should the user enable to implement his own 
ideas.

If you start to enforce a specific architecture you will have acceptance 
problems.

IMHO...

Oliver

Am 23.01.15 um 19:08 schrieb Mark Struberg:
> actually in a business application is is really _rarely_ wanted ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team).
>>
>> Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual
>> behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not
>> something you always want.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static
>> methods again basically...
>> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> IMO
>> for now?
>> kind of
>> both to
>> should
>> figure out if
>> schrieb am

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
it is since you are not a single team to work on it or if you use an
IoC solution.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-23 19:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> actually in a business application is is really _rarely_ wanted ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >t his problem is actually what I am looking for. Not having it is an
>> issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team).
>>
>> Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual
>> behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not
>> something you always want.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>  The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this
>> Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static
>> methods again basically...
>>>
>>>  LieGrue,
>>>  strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>  On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>  > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder
>> IMO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>  @rmannibucau
>>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>   Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration
>> for now?
>>>>>   Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder
>> kind of
>>>>>   type?
>>>>>
>>>>>   Werner
>>>>>   On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
>>>>>   o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Viele Grüße
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Oliver
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge
>> both to
>>>>  share the
>>>>>>>   bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>   @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>   https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch
>>>>  <at...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   My proposal was to build it first independently (it
>> should
>>>>  nevertheless
>>>>>>>>   depend only on the api) and then in a second step
>> figure out if
>>>>  und how
>>>>>>>>   it
>>>>>>>>   may include/combine it with what we have...
>>>>>>>>   Agree?
>>>>>>>>   Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> schrieb am
>>>>  Fr., 23. Jan.
>>>>>>>>   2015 um
>>>>>>>>   07:35:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>   N Oliver B. Fischer
>>>>>>   A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>>>>>>   P +49 30 44793251
>>>>>>   M +49 178 7903538
>>>>>>   E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>>>>>>   S oliver.b.fischer
>>>>>>   J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>>>>>>   X http://xing.to/obf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
actually in a business application is is really _rarely_ wanted ;)

LieGrue,
strub





> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >t his problem is actually what I am looking for. Not having it is an
> issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team).
> 
> Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual
> behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not
> something you always want.
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>  The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this 
> Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static 
> methods again basically...
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>  On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder 
> IMO
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>  @rmannibucau
>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
>>>>   Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration 
> for now?
>>>>   Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder 
> kind of
>>>>   type?
>>>> 
>>>>   Werner
>>>>   On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
>>>>   o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>   I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Viele Grüße
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Oliver
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>   we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge 
> both to
>>>  share the
>>>>>>   bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>   @rmannibucau
>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>>   https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch
>>>  <at...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   My proposal was to build it first independently (it 
> should
>>>  nevertheless
>>>>>>>   depend only on the api) and then in a second step 
> figure out if
>>>  und how
>>>>>>>   it
>>>>>>>   may include/combine it with what we have...
>>>>>>>   Agree?
>>>>>>>   Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> 
> schrieb am
>>>  Fr., 23. Jan.
>>>>>>>   2015 um
>>>>>>>   07:35:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>   --
>>>>>   N Oliver B. Fischer
>>>>>   A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>>>>>   P +49 30 44793251
>>>>>   M +49 178 7903538
>>>>>   E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>>>>>   S oliver.b.fischer
>>>>>   J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>>>>>   X http://xing.to/obf
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
this problem is actually what I am looking for. Not having it is an
issue for me (in particular when you work with off-shore team).

Would also be awesome to be able to totally inhibit contextual
behavior - maybe we can I didnt think to it, just meant this is not
something you always want.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-23 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static methods again basically...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder IMO
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
>>>  Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now?
>>>  Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of
>>>  type?
>>>
>>>  Werner
>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
>>>  o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>>>
>>>>  Viele Grüße
>>>>
>>>>  Oliver
>>>>
>>>>  Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>>>
>>>>>  we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to
>> share the
>>>>>  bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>  @rmannibucau
>>>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch
>> <at...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  My proposal was to build it first independently (it should
>> nevertheless
>>>>>>  depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if
>> und how
>>>>>>  it
>>>>>>  may include/combine it with what we have...
>>>>>>  Agree?
>>>>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am
>> Fr., 23. Jan.
>>>>>>  2015 um
>>>>>>  07:35:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  N Oliver B. Fischer
>>>>  A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>>>>  P +49 30 44793251
>>>>  M +49 178 7903538
>>>>  E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>>>>  S oliver.b.fischer
>>>>  J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>>>>  X http://xing.to/obf
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
Hi Mark,

as usually it depends. From my point of view the user must decide what 
he needs. We must not force him to do it in a specific way.

Secondly we must distinguish between the setup of the configuration and 
the distribution of the configuration values. For example it is totally 
fine to configure it manually and use Guice to inject the configuration.

Bye,

Oliver


First
Am 23.01.15 um 18:59 schrieb Mark Struberg:
> The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static methods again basically...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
>> share the
>> <at...@gmail.com>:
>> nevertheless
>> und how
>> Fr., 23. Jan.

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
The problem which will pop up is that you have to propagate this Configuration throughout your application. Then you are back to the static methods again basically...

LieGrue,
strub





> On Friday, 23 January 2015, 12:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder IMO
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
>>  Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now?
>>  Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of
>>  type?
>> 
>>  Werner
>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
>>  o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>  I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>> 
>>>  Viele Grüße
>>> 
>>>  Oliver
>>> 
>>>  Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>> 
>>>>  we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to 
> share the
>>>>  bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>  @rmannibucau
>>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch 
> <at...@gmail.com>:
>>>> 
>>>>>  My proposal was to build it first independently (it should 
> nevertheless
>>>>>  depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if 
> und how
>>>>>  it
>>>>>  may include/combine it with what we have...
>>>>>  Agree?
>>>>>  Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am 
> Fr., 23. Jan.
>>>>>  2015 um
>>>>>  07:35:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>  --
>>>  N Oliver B. Fischer
>>>  A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>>>  P +49 30 44793251
>>>  M +49 178 7903538
>>>  E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>>>  S oliver.b.fischer
>>>  J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>>>  X http://xing.to/obf
>>> 
>>> 
>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
finally Configuration.Builder but short term ConfigurationBuilder IMO


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>:
> Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now?
> Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of
> type?
>
> Werner
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:
>
>> I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>>
>> Viele Grüße
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>>
>>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the
>>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless
>>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how
>>>> it
>>>> may include/combine it with what we have...
>>>> Agree?
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan.
>>>> 2015 um
>>>> 07:35:
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> N Oliver B. Fischer
>> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>> P +49 30 44793251
>> M +49 178 7903538
>> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>> S oliver.b.fischer
>> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>> X http://xing.to/obf
>>
>>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Can you specify where you feel this applies, only Configuration for now?
Like a Configuration.Builder or a separate ConfigurationBuilder kind of
type?

Werner
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net> wrote:

> I see it also as a kind of prototype.
>
> Viele Grüße
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>
>> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the
>> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless
>>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how
>>> it
>>> may include/combine it with what we have...
>>> Agree?
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan.
>>> 2015 um
>>> 07:35:
>>>
>>>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
I see it also as a kind of prototype.

Viele Grüße

Oliver

Am 23.01.15 um 09:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the
> bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>:
>> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless
>> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how it
>> may include/combine it with what we have...
>> Agree?
>> Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan. 2015 um
>> 07:35:
>>

-- 
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf


Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
we can but if we are satisfied we'll need to merge both to share the
bootstrap API but OK let's do it as a first step.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-23 8:30 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>:
> My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless
> depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how it
> may include/combine it with what we have...
> Agree?
> Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan. 2015 um
> 07:35:
>
>> After yesterday discussion I think it should be in the API and we build
>> current   API on top of it.
>>
>> +1 anyway
>> Le 23 janv. 2015 07:14, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > in the last (really the last?) hangout Anatole and I discussed the
>> problem
>> > of configuring a Configuration manually. We would like to see an builder
>> > module in the modules section of Tamaya for this.
>> >
>> > I would like to add this before closing the feature list for 0.1.
>> >
>> > Any objections?
>> >
>> > Bye,
>> >
>> > Oliver
>> >
>> > --
>> > N Oliver B. Fischer
>> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
>> > P +49 30 44793251
>> > M +49 178 7903538
>> > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
>> > S oliver.b.fischer
>> > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
>> > X http://xing.to/obf
>> >
>> >
>>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
My proposal was to build it first independently (it should nevertheless
depend only on the api) and then in a second step figure out if und how it
may include/combine it with what we have...
Agree?
Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 23. Jan. 2015 um
07:35:

> After yesterday discussion I think it should be in the API and we build
> current   API on top of it.
>
> +1 anyway
> Le 23 janv. 2015 07:14, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> a
> écrit :
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > in the last (really the last?) hangout Anatole and I discussed the
> problem
> > of configuring a Configuration manually. We would like to see an builder
> > module in the modules section of Tamaya for this.
> >
> > I would like to add this before closing the feature list for 0.1.
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > Bye,
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > --
> > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > P +49 30 44793251
> > M +49 178 7903538
> > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > S oliver.b.fischer
> > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > X http://xing.to/obf
> >
> >
>

Re: Adding a builder for Tamaya

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
After yesterday discussion I think it should be in the API and we build
current   API on top of it.

+1 anyway
Le 23 janv. 2015 07:14, "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> in the last (really the last?) hangout Anatole and I discussed the problem
> of configuring a Configuration manually. We would like to see an builder
> module in the modules section of Tamaya for this.
>
> I would like to add this before closing the feature list for 0.1.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Bye,
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>