You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> on 2015/11/24 16:55:36 UTC
[DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
4.1-SNAPSHOT.
This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
* pax-web 6.x
* sshd 1.0
* support for narayana transaction manager
* JDK 8
* ... name it ...
The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
Thoughts ?
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
+1 from my side.
2015-11-24 17:44 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>:
> You're right, I was thinking about JDK 8 requirement. To be discussed.
>
> 2015-11-24 17:10 GMT+01:00 Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Sounds good - i thought we already had JDK 8 support.. I'm assuming
> > more JDK8 support?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> > > I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> > > 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
> > >
> > > This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> > > * pax-web 6.x
> > > * sshd 1.0
> > > * support for narayana transaction manager
> > > * JDK 8
> > > * ... name it ...
> > > The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> >
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
You're right, I was thinking about JDK 8 requirement. To be discussed.
2015-11-24 17:10 GMT+01:00 Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com>:
> Sounds good - i thought we already had JDK 8 support.. I'm assuming
> more JDK8 support?
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> > I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> > 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
> >
> > This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> > * pax-web 6.x
> > * sshd 1.0
> > * support for narayana transaction manager
> > * JDK 8
> > * ... name it ...
> > The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
> >
> > Thoughts ?
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good - i thought we already had JDK 8 support.. I'm assuming
more JDK8 support?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> * pax-web 6.x
> * sshd 1.0
> * support for narayana transaction manager
> * JDK 8
> * ... name it ...
> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>
> Thoughts ?
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me.
2015-11-25 8:36 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Good point, it makes sense.
>
> I was planning a 4.0.4 release for end of this week or beginning of next
> one. As we are not in a rush, let's do like this: branching just after
> 4.0.4 release.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/25/2015 08:16 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
>> Non at all,
>>
>> maybe doing a 4.0.4 release on master before branching might also be a
>> good
>> point in time to get that started?
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>> 2015-11-25 7:16 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have some changes on local branches that I want to push. I will do it
>>> today, and so, I will create the karaf-4.0.x branch tonight.
>>>
>>> Any objection ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 11/24/2015 04:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
>>>> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
>>>> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>
>>>> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
>>>> * pax-web 6.x
>>>> * sshd 1.0
>>>> * support for narayana transaction manager
>>>> * JDK 8
>>>> * ... name it ...
>>>> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Good point, it makes sense.
I was planning a 4.0.4 release for end of this week or beginning of next
one. As we are not in a rush, let's do like this: branching just after
4.0.4 release.
Regards
JB
On 11/25/2015 08:16 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Non at all,
>
> maybe doing a 4.0.4 release on master before branching might also be a good
> point in time to get that started?
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2015-11-25 7:16 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some changes on local branches that I want to push. I will do it
>> today, and so, I will create the karaf-4.0.x branch tonight.
>>
>> Any objection ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/24/2015 04:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
>>> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
>>> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>>>
>>> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
>>> * pax-web 6.x
>>> * sshd 1.0
>>> * support for narayana transaction manager
>>> * JDK 8
>>> * ... name it ...
>>> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Non at all,
maybe doing a 4.0.4 release on master before branching might also be a good
point in time to get that started?
regards, Achim
2015-11-25 7:16 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some changes on local branches that I want to push. I will do it
> today, and so, I will create the karaf-4.0.x branch tonight.
>
> Any objection ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/24/2015 04:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
>> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
>> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
>> * pax-web 6.x
>> * sshd 1.0
>> * support for narayana transaction manager
>> * JDK 8
>> * ... name it ...
>> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi all,
I have some changes on local branches that I want to push. I will do it
today, and so, I will create the karaf-4.0.x branch tonight.
Any objection ?
Regards
JB
On 11/24/2015 04:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> * pax-web 6.x
> * sshd 1.0
> * support for narayana transaction manager
> * JDK 8
> * ... name it ...
> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>
> Thoughts ?
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> * pax-web 6.x
> * sshd 1.0
> * support for narayana transaction manager
> * JDK 8
> * ... name it ...
> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>
> Thoughts ?
Re: [DISCUSS] Move master to 4.1 and create a 4.x maintenance branch
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Guillaume,
I agree.
Other changes submitted to the discussion:
- remove Java7 support (JDK 8 min)
- pax-web 6 with Jetty 9.3 (requiring Java8)
- use yajsw instead of tanuki
- refactoring of the guides (I will do it on Karaf 4 as well anyway)
- add karaf-boot there and base dev guide on this
- add bootstrapping feature (related to karaf-boot)
Regards
JB
On 11/24/2015 04:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'd like to start the discussion around moving forward to Karaf 4.1.
> I propose we create a 4.x maintenance branch and move master to
> 4.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> This will allow introducing important dependencies upgrades such as:
> * pax-web 6.x
> * sshd 1.0
> * support for narayana transaction manager
> * JDK 8
> * ... name it ...
> The above list is obviously subject to discussion...
>
> Thoughts ?
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com