You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/06/03 19:18:02 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2766) Single walog operation may wait
for multiple hsync calls
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14016889#comment-14016889 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ACCUMULO-2766:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1e16159cdb25121123a3ea64df8a47c0eda54709 in accumulo's branch refs/heads/1.5.2-SNAPSHOT from [~keith_turner]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;h=1e16159 ]
ACCUMULO-2766 fix wal group commit
> Single walog operation may wait for multiple hsync calls
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-2766
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2766
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tserver
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.6.0
> Reporter: Keith Turner
> Assignee: Keith Turner
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 1.5.2, 1.6.1
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-2677-1.patch, ACCUMULO-2766-2.patch
>
>
> While looking into slow {{hsync}} calls, I noticed an oddity in the way Accumulo processes syncs. Specifically the way {{closeLock}} is used in {{DfsLogger}}, it seems like the following situation could occur.
>
> # thread B starts executing DfsLogger.LogSyncingTask.run()
> # thread 1 enters DfsLogger.logFileData()
> # thread 1 writes to walog
> # thread 1 locks _closeLock_
> # thread 1 adds sync work to workQueue
> # thread 1 unlocks _closeLock_
> # thread B takes sync work off of workQueue
> # thread B locks _closeLock_
> # thread B calls sync
> # thread 3 enters DfsLogger.logFileData()
> # thread 3 writes to walog
> # thread 3 blocks locking _closeLock_
> # thread 4 enters DfsLogger.logFileData()
> # thread 4 writes to walog
> # thread 4 blocks locking _closeLock_
> # thread B unlocks _closeLock_
> # thread 4 locks _closeLock_
> # thread 4 adds sync work to workQueue
> # thread B takes sync work off of workQueue
> # thread B blocks locking _closeLock_
> # thread 4 unlocks _closeLock_
> # thread B locks _closeLock_
> # thread B calls sync
> # thread B unlocks _closeLock_
> # thread 3 locks _closeLock_
> # thread 3 adds sync work to workQueue
> # thread 3 unlocks _closeLock_
> In this situation thread 3 unnecessarily has to wait for an extra {{hsync}} call. Not sure if this situation actually occurs, or if it occurs very frequently. Looking at the code it seems like it would be nice if sync operations could be queued w/o synchronizing w/ sync operations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)