You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/11/30 15:31:20 UTC
[jira] Created: (CXF-2564) CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider
upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CXF-2564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2564
Project: CXF
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.2.5
Reporter: Claus Ibsen
Looks like trunk is on API 1.1 which is good
But 2.2.5 is using old 1.0 API
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.2.5/rt/frontend/jaxrs/pom.xml
Which does not work well with the rest of the world where 1.1 API is commonly used.
Consider if possible to upgrade to 1.1 on these branches, or at least on 2.2.x branch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-2564) CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider
upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783670#action_12783670 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CXF-2564:
----------------------------------
1.0 API in pom.xml
{code}
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.ws.rs</groupId>
<artifactId>jsr311-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
{code}
And trunk uses version 1.1 which is good.
> CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-2564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2564
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.2.5
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>
> Looks like trunk is on API 1.1 which is good
> But 2.2.5 is using old 1.0 API
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.2.5/rt/frontend/jaxrs/pom.xml
> Which does not work well with the rest of the world where 1.1 API is commonly used.
> Consider if possible to upgrade to 1.1 on these branches, or at least on 2.2.x branch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-2564) CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider
upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
Posted by "Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783688#action_12783688 ]
Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-2564:
---------------------------------------
CXF 2.3-SNAPSHOT depends on 1.1, but CXF 2.2.x depends on 1.0.
1.1 has very few minor changes at the api level itself, it is really a JAX-RS EE spec, as it says that EJB and friends have to be supported when JAXRS 1.1 implementations are used in EE containers.
Updating cxfcamel to depend on 1.1 may have sideeffects on a ServiceMix cxfrs demo given that cxfrs feature will install a jaxrs 1.0 spec bundle.
> Which does not work well with the rest of the world where 1.1 API is commonly used.
Do you see any sideeffects with cxfcamel depending on 1.0 ?
cheers, Sergey
> CXF uses an old RS API 1.0 - Consider upgrading to 1.1 on branches as well
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-2564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2564
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.2.5
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>
> Looks like trunk is on API 1.1 which is good
> But 2.2.5 is using old 1.0 API
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.2.5/rt/frontend/jaxrs/pom.xml
> Which does not work well with the rest of the world where 1.1 API is commonly used.
> Consider if possible to upgrade to 1.1 on these branches, or at least on 2.2.x branch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.