Re: JUnit fixed

[Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>]

David Saff wrote:
> Is it customary to manually send a note when a project has been fixed in 
> CVS?  Or is the fix itself sufficient?  Is this the right place to send 
> such a note?
> 


Welcome to the Gump mailing list, David

Usually a project is left to worry about its own problems; gump is just 
a facility to build and test against CVS/SVN head versions of other 
people's stuff.

Where the mailing list comes more into play is finding out why your code 
suddenly stops working even when you havent changed anything; when a 
change in something common like ant, log4j or xerces can switch half the 
projects into red-build-state.

It's also the place to get tweaks done to your gump descriptor, like 
switch to a different CVS branch, build some different artifacts, or 
have the email alias changed. Or to ask why you keep getting told off 
for a broken build, when it should be working.

 > Regardless, JUnit was broken last night.  It should be fixed now. 
Thanks,
 >

the 162 direct dependees will appreciate the fix. There may actually be 
more, as if you depend on ant you implicitly get junit for free.

-steve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org