You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/09 00:08:09 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Hello,
This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release
notes:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
Binary artifacts:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
The tag to be voted
upon:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
cheers
Cam
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
Ok, so we have 3 binding +1 votes then?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> No - his vote was non-binding. Only binding votes count.
>
> -Jordan
>
>
> On July 9, 2014 at 5:02:58 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
> rebuilt?
> cheers
> Cam
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of
> the
> > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
> should
> > > use placeholder values, like in
> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >
> > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> > >
> > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > > identification within third-party archives.
> > >
> > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> > >
> > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
> was
> > a
> > > mistake.
> > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> > >
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file
> looks
> > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of
> those
> > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> > another
> > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> > >
> > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
> headers.
> > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> > > about unknown files).
> > >
> > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > > unfortunate.
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > > -1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> > >
> > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > (brought
> > > up in the other thread)
> > >
> > > Missing licence headers:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> > >
> > > Incomplete licence header:
> > > * doap.rdf
> > >
> > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > > * Compiled cleanly!
> > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed
> in
> > > master)
> > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Validated keys
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to release
> > > > > > notes:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > > upon:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cam
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > ashish
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
No - his vote was non-binding. Only binding votes count.
-Jordan
On July 9, 2014 at 5:02:58 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
rebuilt?
cheers
Cam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of the
> > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we should
> > use placeholder values, like in
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >
> > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> >
> > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > identification within third-party archives.
> >
> > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> >
> > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That was
> a
> > mistake.
> > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> >
> > doap.rdf
> > What’s incomplete?
> >
> > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks
> > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those
> > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> another
> > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> >
> > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers.
> > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> > about unknown files).
> >
> > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > unfortunate.
> > doap.rdf
> > What’s incomplete?
> >
> > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> >
> > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> (brought
> > up in the other thread)
> >
> > Missing licence headers:
> > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> >
> > Incomplete licence header:
> > * doap.rdf
> >
> > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > * Compiled cleanly!
> > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
> > master)
> > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Validated keys
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link to release
> > > > > notes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > >
> > > > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > upon:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Cam
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > thanks
> > > > ashish
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Yes, please complete the release.
On July 10, 2014 at 10:54:49 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
Right, it appears that no one wants to change their vote, so I guess the RC
can be released. The fixes Mike's suggested can be picked up in 2.7.0
I will send out a formal email and release in the next day.
cheers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
> So, currently we have:
> 3 binding +1
> 1 non binding +1
> 1 non binding -1
>
> Do any of the binding voters want to change their votes based on Mike's
> assessment of the RC?
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Cam,
>>
>> As the person who called the vote, you will need to go through the email
>> thread and tally up all the counts. Generally, an ASF project needs
>> majority approval from committers to release, that is at least 3 +1s and
>> more +1s than -1s. It would be a good idea to verify this against the
>> Curator bylaws. If the vote passes, then you release, if the vote does not
>> pass then you build a new RC.
>>
>> My vote is non-binding, which means it doesn't count. I'd petition binding
>> voters to -1 for the reasons I enumerated, but the decision is ultimately
>> out of my hands.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
>> > rebuilt?
>> > cheers
>> > Cam
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every
>> file.
>> > > >
>> > > > -JZ
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all
>> of
>> > the
>> > > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
>> > should
>> > > > use placeholder values, like in
>> > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> > > >
>> > > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
>> > > >
>> > > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
>> > > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
>> > > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
>> > > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
>> > > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
>> > > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on
>> the
>> > > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
>> > > > identification within third-party archives.
>> > > >
>> > > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
>> > > >
>> > > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
>> > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>> > > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
>> > was
>> > > a
>> > > > mistake.
>> > > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
>> > > >
>> > > > doap.rdf
>> > > > What’s incomplete?
>> > > >
>> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
>> > assertion.
>> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
>> > > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file
>> looks
>> > > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of
>> those
>> > > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
>> > > another
>> > > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
>> > > >
>> > > > -JZ
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
>> > > >
>> > > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
>> > > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
>> > headers.
>> > > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some
>> warnings
>> > > > about unknown files).
>> > > >
>> > > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
>> > > > unfortunate.
>> > > > doap.rdf
>> > > > What’s incomplete?
>> > > >
>> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
>> > assertion.
>> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > -1 (non-binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
>> > > >
>> > > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
>> > > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
>> > > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > (brought
>> > > > up in the other thread)
>> > > >
>> > > > Missing licence headers:
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
>> > > >
>> > > > Incomplete licence header:
>> > > > * doap.rdf
>> > > >
>> > > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
>> > > > * Compiled cleanly!
>> > > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting()
>> (fixed
>> > in
>> > > > master)
>> > > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
>> > > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Validated keys
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
>> > > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
>> > > > > > <javascript:;>)
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>> > > > > > > provided for convenience.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Link to release
>> > > > > > > notes:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Staging repo:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Binary artifacts:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The tag to be voted
>> > > > > > > upon:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> > > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > cheers
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cam
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > thanks
>> > > > > > ashish
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> > > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
Right, it appears that no one wants to change their vote, so I guess the RC
can be released. The fixes Mike's suggested can be picked up in 2.7.0
I will send out a formal email and release in the next day.
cheers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
> So, currently we have:
> 3 binding +1
> 1 non binding +1
> 1 non binding -1
>
> Do any of the binding voters want to change their votes based on Mike's
> assessment of the RC?
> cheers
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Cam,
>>
>> As the person who called the vote, you will need to go through the email
>> thread and tally up all the counts. Generally, an ASF project needs
>> majority approval from committers to release, that is at least 3 +1s and
>> more +1s than -1s. It would be a good idea to verify this against the
>> Curator bylaws. If the vote passes, then you release, if the vote does not
>> pass then you build a new RC.
>>
>> My vote is non-binding, which means it doesn't count. I'd petition binding
>> voters to -1 for the reasons I enumerated, but the decision is ultimately
>> out of my hands.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
>> > rebuilt?
>> > cheers
>> > Cam
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every
>> file.
>> > > >
>> > > > -JZ
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all
>> of
>> > the
>> > > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
>> > should
>> > > > use placeholder values, like in
>> > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>> > > >
>> > > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
>> > > >
>> > > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
>> > > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
>> > > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
>> > > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
>> > > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
>> > > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on
>> the
>> > > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
>> > > > identification within third-party archives.
>> > > >
>> > > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
>> > > >
>> > > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
>> > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>> > > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
>> > was
>> > > a
>> > > > mistake.
>> > > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
>> > > >
>> > > > doap.rdf
>> > > > What’s incomplete?
>> > > >
>> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
>> > assertion.
>> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
>> > > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file
>> looks
>> > > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of
>> those
>> > > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
>> > > another
>> > > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
>> > > >
>> > > > -JZ
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
>> > > >
>> > > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
>> > > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
>> > headers.
>> > > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some
>> warnings
>> > > > about unknown files).
>> > > >
>> > > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
>> > > > unfortunate.
>> > > > doap.rdf
>> > > > What’s incomplete?
>> > > >
>> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
>> > assertion.
>> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > -1 (non-binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
>> > > >
>> > > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
>> > > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
>> > > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > (brought
>> > > > up in the other thread)
>> > > >
>> > > > Missing licence headers:
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
>> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
>> > > >
>> > > > Incomplete licence header:
>> > > > * doap.rdf
>> > > >
>> > > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
>> > > > * Compiled cleanly!
>> > > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting()
>> (fixed
>> > in
>> > > > master)
>> > > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
>> > > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> > > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Validated keys
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
>> > > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
>> > > > > > <javascript:;>)
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hello,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>> > > > > > > provided for convenience.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Link to release
>> > > > > > > notes:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Staging repo:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Binary artifacts:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The tag to be voted
>> > > > > > > upon:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> > > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > cheers
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cam
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > thanks
>> > > > > > ashish
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> > > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Mike,
So, currently we have:
3 binding +1
1 non binding +1
1 non binding -1
Do any of the binding voters want to change their votes based on Mike's
assessment of the RC?
cheers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Cam,
>
> As the person who called the vote, you will need to go through the email
> thread and tally up all the counts. Generally, an ASF project needs
> majority approval from committers to release, that is at least 3 +1s and
> more +1s than -1s. It would be a good idea to verify this against the
> Curator bylaws. If the vote passes, then you release, if the vote does not
> pass then you build a new RC.
>
> My vote is non-binding, which means it doesn't count. I'd petition binding
> voters to -1 for the reasons I enumerated, but the decision is ultimately
> out of my hands.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
> > rebuilt?
> > cheers
> > Cam
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every
> file.
> > > >
> > > > -JZ
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of
> > the
> > > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
> > should
> > > > use placeholder values, like in
> > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > > >
> > > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> > > >
> > > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on
> the
> > > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > > > identification within third-party archives.
> > > >
> > > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> > > >
> > > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
> > was
> > > a
> > > > mistake.
> > > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> > > >
> > > > doap.rdf
> > > > What’s incomplete?
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> > assertion.
> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file
> looks
> > > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of
> those
> > > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> > > another
> > > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> > > >
> > > > -JZ
> > > >
> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> > > >
> > > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
> > headers.
> > > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some
> warnings
> > > > about unknown files).
> > > >
> > > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > > > unfortunate.
> > > > doap.rdf
> > > > What’s incomplete?
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> > assertion.
> > > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> > > >
> > > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > (brought
> > > > up in the other thread)
> > > >
> > > > Missing licence headers:
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> > > >
> > > > Incomplete licence header:
> > > > * doap.rdf
> > > >
> > > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > > > * Compiled cleanly!
> > > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting()
> (fixed
> > in
> > > > master)
> > > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Validated keys
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Link to release
> > > > > > > notes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Staging repo:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > > > upon:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > cheers
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > ashish
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
Cam,
As the person who called the vote, you will need to go through the email
thread and tally up all the counts. Generally, an ASF project needs
majority approval from committers to release, that is at least 3 +1s and
more +1s than -1s. It would be a good idea to verify this against the
Curator bylaws. If the vote passes, then you release, if the vote does not
pass then you build a new RC.
My vote is non-binding, which means it doesn't count. I'd petition binding
voters to -1 for the reasons I enumerated, but the decision is ultimately
out of my hands.
Mike
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
> rebuilt?
> cheers
> Cam
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of
> the
> > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
> should
> > > use placeholder values, like in
> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >
> > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> > >
> > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > > identification within third-party archives.
> > >
> > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> > >
> > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
> was
> > a
> > > mistake.
> > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> > >
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks
> > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those
> > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> > another
> > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> > >
> > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
> headers.
> > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> > > about unknown files).
> > >
> > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > > unfortunate.
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > -1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> > >
> > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > (brought
> > > up in the other thread)
> > >
> > > Missing licence headers:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> > >
> > > Incomplete licence header:
> > > * doap.rdf
> > >
> > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > > * Compiled cleanly!
> > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed
> in
> > > master)
> > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Validated keys
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to release
> > > > > > notes:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > > upon:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cam
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > ashish
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
rebuilt?
cheers
Cam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of the
> > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we should
> > use placeholder values, like in
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> >
> > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> >
> > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > identification within third-party archives.
> >
> > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> >
> > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That was
> a
> > mistake.
> > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> >
> > doap.rdf
> > What’s incomplete?
> >
> > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks
> > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those
> > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> another
> > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> >
> > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers.
> > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> > about unknown files).
> >
> > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > unfortunate.
> > doap.rdf
> > What’s incomplete?
> >
> > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
> >
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> >
> > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> (brought
> > up in the other thread)
> >
> > Missing licence headers:
> > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> >
> > Incomplete licence header:
> > * doap.rdf
> >
> > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > * Compiled cleanly!
> > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
> > master)
> > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Validated keys
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link to release
> > > > > notes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > >
> > > > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > upon:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers
> > > > >
> > > > > Cam
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > thanks
> > > > ashish
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>.
+1
Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> wrote:
> Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
>
> -JZ
>
>
> On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
>
> Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of the
> LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we should
> use placeholder values, like in
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>
> APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
>
> To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> identification within third-party archives.
>
> Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
>
> Tomcat is a fine reference -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That was a
> mistake.
> * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
>
> doap.rdf
> What’s incomplete?
>
> It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks
> just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those
> docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to another
> project’s DOAP file that is better?
>
> -JZ
>
> On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> This shouldn’t be part of the project
>
> Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers.
> When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> about unknown files).
>
> Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> unfortunate.
> doap.rdf
> What’s incomplete?
>
> It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion.
> Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
>
>
>
>
> On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
>
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified signature and hashes, all good.
>
> The git tag does not match the source zip:
> * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml (brought
> up in the other thread)
>
> Missing licence headers:
> * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
>
> Incomplete licence header:
> * doap.rdf
>
> Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> * Compiled cleanly!
> * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
> master)
> * Had a intermittent test failure in
> TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Validated keys
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > >
> > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > >
> > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > provided for convenience.
> > > >
> > > > Link to release
> > > > notes:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > >
> > > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > >
> > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > upon:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > >
> > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > >
> > > > Cam
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > thanks
> > > ashish
> > >
> > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
-JZ
On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of the LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we should use placeholder values, like in http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
Tomcat is a fine reference - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
* I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That was a mistake.
* I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
doap.rdf
What’s incomplete?
It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion. Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to another project’s DOAP file that is better?
-JZ
On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
This shouldn’t be part of the project
Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers. When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings about unknown files).
Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is unfortunate.
doap.rdf
What’s incomplete?
It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion. Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
Verified signature and hashes, all good.
The git tag does not match the source zip:
* zip contains a file called .test.swp
* zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml (brought
up in the other thread)
Missing licence headers:
* curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
Incomplete licence header:
* doap.rdf
Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
* Compiled cleanly!
* Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
master)
* Had a intermittent test failure in
TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Validated keys
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Link to release
> > > notes:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > >
> > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted
> > > upon:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > >
> > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Cam
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
* I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That was a mistake.
* I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
doap.rdf
What’s incomplete?
It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion. Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file looks just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of those docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to another project’s DOAP file that is better?
-JZ
On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
This shouldn’t be part of the project
Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers. When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings about unknown files).
Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is unfortunate.
doap.rdf
What’s incomplete?
It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright assertion. Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
Verified signature and hashes, all good.
The git tag does not match the source zip:
* zip contains a file called .test.swp
* zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml (brought
up in the other thread)
Missing licence headers:
* curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
Incomplete licence header:
* doap.rdf
Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
* Compiled cleanly!
* Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
master)
* Had a intermittent test failure in
TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Validated keys
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Link to release
> > > notes:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > >
> > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted
> > > upon:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > >
> > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Cam
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
This shouldn’t be part of the project
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license headers. When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings about unknown files).
doap.rdf
What’s incomplete?
On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com) wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
Verified signature and hashes, all good.
The git tag does not match the source zip:
* zip contains a file called .test.swp
* zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml (brought
up in the other thread)
Missing licence headers:
* curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
Incomplete licence header:
* doap.rdf
Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
* Compiled cleanly!
* Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
master)
* Had a intermittent test failure in
TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Validated keys
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Link to release
> > > notes:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > >
> > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted
> > > upon:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > >
> > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Cam
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
-1 (non-binding)
Verified signature and hashes, all good.
The git tag does not match the source zip:
* zip contains a file called .test.swp
* zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml (brought
up in the other thread)
Missing licence headers:
* curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
* curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
* curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
Incomplete licence header:
* doap.rdf
Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
* Compiled cleanly!
* Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed in
master)
* Had a intermittent test failure in
TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Validated keys
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Link to release
> > > notes:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > >
> > > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > >
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted
> > > upon:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > >
> > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Cam
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > wrote:
>
> > Validated keys
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>)
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > provided for convenience.
> >
> > Link to release
> > notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> >
> > Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> >
> > Binary artifacts:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> >
> >
> > The tag to be voted
> > upon:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> >
> > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Cam
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> wrote:
> Validated keys
>
> +1
>
>
> On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
>
> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> provided for convenience.
>
> Link to release
> notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
>
> Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
>
> Binary artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
>
>
> The tag to be voted
> upon:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
>
> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> cheers
>
> Cam
>
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Validated keys
+1
On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release
notes:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
Binary artifacts:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
The tag to be voted
upon:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
cheers
Cam
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
never mind - my mistake. It’s ok. I found it.
On July 8, 2014 at 6:22:17 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
I believe so yes. I'm not in the Web of Trust though.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
Did you upload your key to the central GPG server?
-Jordan
On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release
notes:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
Binary artifacts:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
The tag to be voted
upon:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
cheers
Cam
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
Looks like it's just on the default one used by gpg
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/
Is it meant to go to another key server? The apache docs weren't specific.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> wrote:
> What key server did you use? I can’t find your key.
>
>
> On July 8, 2014 at 6:22:17 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> I believe so yes. I'm not in the Web of Trust though.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>
>> Did you upload your key to the central GPG server?
>>
>> -Jordan
>>
>>
>> On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>> provided for convenience.
>>
>> Link to release
>> notes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
>>
>> Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
>>
>> Binary artifacts:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
>>
>>
>> The tag to be voted
>> upon:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
>>
>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>> release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Cam
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
What key server did you use? I can’t find your key.
On July 8, 2014 at 6:22:17 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
I believe so yes. I'm not in the Web of Trust though.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
Did you upload your key to the central GPG server?
-Jordan
On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release
notes:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
Binary artifacts:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
The tag to be voted
upon:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
cheers
Cam
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
I believe so yes. I'm not in the Web of Trust though.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> wrote:
> Did you upload your key to the central GPG server?
>
> -Jordan
>
>
> On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
>
> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> provided for convenience.
>
> Link to release
> notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
>
> Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
>
> Binary artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
>
>
> The tag to be voted
> upon:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
>
> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> cheers
>
> Cam
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Did you upload your key to the central GPG server?
-Jordan
On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release
notes:https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
Staging repo:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
Binary artifacts:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
The tag to be voted
upon:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
cheers
Cam