You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> on 2009/06/01 20:49:16 UTC
release 0.9.1
I think 0.9.1 is ready for release.
What do you think?
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2009, at 20:49, Chris Anderson wrote:
> I think 0.9.1 is ready for release.
>
> What do you think?
+1
Jan
--
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
I went back and reviewed my commits that have not been blocked or
merged. I don't think any of them absolutely need to be merged. +1
for 0.9.1,
Adam
On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> I think we should get the ball rolling. I can't say for certain
> that the current 0.9.x has everything that it should have, though.
>
> Adam
>
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> I think 0.9.1 is ready for release.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Anderson
>>> http://jchrisa.net
>>> http://couch.io
>>>
>
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 02.06.2009, at 21:41, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we should get the ball rolling. I can't say for certain that
>>> the current 0.9.x has everything that it should have, though.
>>
>> I have pushed back everything I want to push back, so the rest is up to
>> you
>> guys. Let me know once you've all agreed that the branch is ready for a
>> release
>> and I'll make the proper preparations.
>
> Go for it :)
>
I just checked in some cleanup in the test suite. Somehow a patch had
introduced an unnoticed syntax error, anyway, all is well.
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 02.06.2009, at 21:41, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>> I think we should get the ball rolling. I can't say for certain that
>> the current 0.9.x has everything that it should have, though.
>
> I have pushed back everything I want to push back, so the rest is up
> to you
> guys. Let me know once you've all agreed that the branch is ready
> for a release
> and I'll make the proper preparations.
Go for it :)
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> I think we should get the ball rolling. I can't say for certain that
> the current 0.9.x has everything that it should have, though.
I have pushed back everything I want to push back, so the rest is up to you
guys. Let me know once you've all agreed that the branch is ready for a release
and I'll make the proper preparations.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
I think we should get the ball rolling. I can't say for certain that
the current 0.9.x has everything that it should have, though.
Adam
On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>> I think 0.9.1 is ready for release.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --
>> Chris Anderson
>> http://jchrisa.net
>> http://couch.io
>>
Re: release 0.9.1
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think 0.9.1 is ready for release.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchrisa.net
> http://couch.io
>