Re: CVS Head build trouble

[cd...@apache.org]

Hi,

I'm starting to work on an up-to-date autoconf build system for log4cxx.
I see in the cvs a patch for apr-1.1.0 : is this patch necessary with 
apr-1.1.1 which have been released recently ?

Regards,

Christophe

Re: CVS Head build trouble

[Curt Arnold <ca...@houston.rr.com>]

Some patches fix problems that prevent compilation with compilers that 
we want to support (such as Borland C++) that have not been of concern 
to APR.  I'm hoping that I can get them integrated into the APR 
Subversion HEAD, but they haven't been.  APR 1.1.1 wasn't a time to 
force the issue since it was a back-port of certain critical issues 
from the HEAD back to the APR 1.1.x branch.

Other patches did some fairly radical surgery to apr-iconv, however I 
expect to abandon them since I expect to abandon apr-iconv.

For right now, I would just ignore the patches in the autoconf build 
since autoconf doesn't attempt to drive any of the compilers that have 
issues with the unmodified APR code and eventually the patches will be 
integrated.



> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to work on an up-to-date autoconf build system for 
> log4cxx.
> I see in the cvs a patch for apr-1.1.0 : is this patch necessary with
> apr-1.1.1 which have been released recently ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christophe
>