You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Dan Filimon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/01/01 21:04:12 UTC
[jira] [Created] (MAHOUT-1135) Unify decorated vectors in
DecoratedVector
Dan Filimon created MAHOUT-1135:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Unify decorated vectors in DecoratedVector<T>
Key: MAHOUT-1135
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Math
Affects Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Dan Filimon
Priority: Minor
I'm finding the current Vector classes in Mahout a bit confusing.
The vector implementation are just fine, I'm talking more about the decorated vectors:
WeightedVector
MatrixSlice
NamedVector
I propose using a single DecoratedVector<T> type that can easily be extended.
For example, right now MatrixSlice doesn't even implement the Vector interface.
So,
WeightedVector -> DecoratedVector<Pair<Integer, Double>>
MatrixSlice -> DecoratedVector<Integer>
NamedVector -> DecoratedVector<String>
We could even keep the names (maybe changing MatrixSlice to something like IndexedVector though?) by extending DecoratedVector<T>.
I'd be willing to fix this if people think it's a good idea.
What about it? :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira