You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> on 2007/12/01 23:03:42 UTC

Re: Forward Conformed Reverse DNS troubleshooting tool

> Ken A <ka...@pacific.net> writes:
> > RFCs say:
> > 1. helo should be a fqdn.
> > 2. you should not reject based on helo.

On 30.11.07 18:33, Graham Murray wrote:
> Not quite. The RFC only says that you should not reject if the helo does
> not match the connecting IP address. It says nothing about rejecting the
> helo for other reasons - such as not being an fqdn.

and this mistake is very common by many people... perhaps they are unable to
understand what's really written in the RFC.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted,
then used against you.