You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Jon Skeet <jo...@peramon.com> on 2003/09/02 12:19:55 UTC

Running Tomcat 4.1.27 without Jasper (or a JDK)?

I'm trying to run Tomcat 4.1 (currently 4.1.27) without needing a full JDK. I don't need any JSP stuff whatsoever, just servlets. Does anyone know of a page explaining how to remove Jasper from Tomcat, or fancy explaining it here? I couldn't find anything in the archive (with only a couple of searches, admittedly).

Thanks,
Jon Skeet

Re: Running Tomcat 4.1.27 without Jasper (or a JDK)?

Posted by Tim Funk <fu...@joedog.org>.
I don't think you need to do anything. But you probaly want to do this:
- remove $CATALINA/common/lib/jasper-compiler.jar
- in $CATALINA/conf/web.xml - comment out boht jasper/jsp references

If you don't use precompiled jsp's
- remove $CATALINA/common/lib/jasper-runtime.jar

You might not need $CATALINA/common/lib/ant.jar either. (I don't know if 
anything other than jasper depends on it)

[ On second thought, you might need to edit setclasspath.bat (or sh) to 
remove the javac check. ]

-Tim

Jon Skeet wrote:
> I'm trying to run Tomcat 4.1 (currently 4.1.27) without needing a full JDK. I don't need any JSP stuff whatsoever, just servlets. Does anyone know of a page explaining how to remove Jasper from Tomcat, or fancy explaining it here? I couldn't find anything in the archive (with only a couple of searches, admittedly).
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon Skeet
> 


Re: Running Tomcat 4.1.27 without Jasper (or a JDK)?

Posted by Thomas Kellerer <sp...@gmx.net>.

Jon Skeet schrieb:

> I'm trying to run Tomcat 4.1 (currently 4.1.27) without needing a full JDK. I
> don't need any JSP stuff whatsoever, just servlets. Does anyone know of a
> page explaining how to remove Jasper from Tomcat, or fancy explaining it
> here? I couldn't find anything in the archive (with only a couple of
> searches, admittedly).
> 
> Thanks, Jon Skeet

Just out of curiosity: I'm wondering why you want to do that?

The overhead of the JDK over JRE isn't that big and disk space isn't usually a 
problem.

Thomas