You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Paul Szulc <pa...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/01 17:06:19 UTC
Re: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
-1
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976
> )
> to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5.
> It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request
> processing.
> Since none of the active core developers use this technology in his daily
> job it is hard for us to support it.
> Now is the time to vote against this decision and give us a hand to improve
> it or just silently agree.
>
> martin-g
>
> P.S. I sent this email earlier today but for some reason it was rejected.
> Excuse me if you receive it for second time.
>
--
Best regards,
Paul Szulc
http://www.paulszulc..com
Re: SV: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
this has already been done, its a bit too late for -1 votes. the
thread was started aug 11.
-igor
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver <To...@arrive.no> wrote:
>> And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email instead of posting to the public list, would you not? :)
>>
>
> No, because I would want their reply to go to the list. The -1 should
> be taken seriously if it has a valid justification.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: SV: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver <To...@arrive.no> wrote:
> And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email instead of posting to the public list, would you not? :)
>
No, because I would want their reply to go to the list. The -1 should
be taken seriously if it has a valid justification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
SV: SV: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by Wilhelmsen Tor Iver <To...@arrive.no>.
> A -1 vote would be a vote against dropping support. You seem to be
> making
> an argument for dropping it. Plus it wasn't your -1, was it?
Ah, then I misunderstood. Was a bit early in the morning I guess.
And if you only wanted a reply from him you would have sent a private email instead of posting to the public list, would you not? :)
- Tor Iver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: SV: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
A -1 vote would be a vote against dropping support. You seem to be making
an argument for dropping it. Plus it wasn't your -1, was it?
On Sep 2, 2010 3:41 AM, "Wilhelmsen Tor Iver" <To...@arrive.no> wrote:
>> Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
>> them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1?
>
> Moving portlet support to a separate project (instead of core or
extensions) makes more sense, that is at least one justification.
>
> (I guess this would in effect be making a "portlet bridge" like IIRC the
support pre-1.4-m2 used. But then it could be moved over to the Apache
portlet bridge project as a whole, if that is still active?)
>
> Popularity of JSR-168/286 seems to be waning, and people instead use
portals implemented directly on top of a content system instead...
>
> - Tor Iver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
SV: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by Wilhelmsen Tor Iver <To...@arrive.no>.
> Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
> them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1?
Moving portlet support to a separate project (instead of core or extensions) makes more sense, that is at least one justification.
(I guess this would in effect be making a "portlet bridge" like IIRC the support pre-1.4-m2 used. But then it could be moved over to the Apache portlet bridge project as a whole, if that is still active?)
Popularity of JSR-168/286 seems to be waning, and people instead use portals implemented directly on top of a content system instead...
- Tor Iver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Remove support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
Usually -1 votes should be accompanied by a justification if you want
them to be considered seriously. Why are you voting -1?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Paul Szulc <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976
>> )
>> to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5.
>> It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request
>> processing.
>> Since none of the active core developers use this technology in his daily
>> job it is hard for us to support it.
>> Now is the time to vote against this decision and give us a hand to improve
>> it or just silently agree.
>>
>> martin-g
>>
>> P.S. I sent this email earlier today but for some reason it was rejected.
>> Excuse me if you receive it for second time.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Paul Szulc
>
> http://www.paulszulc..com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org