[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-278) [Format] Struct type name consistency in implementations and metadata

["Wes McKinney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15465691#comment-15465691 ] 

Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-278:
------------------------------------

See https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/130

> [Format] Struct type name consistency in implementations and metadata
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-278
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-278
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Format
>            Reporter: Wes McKinney
>
> As discussed in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/121 for ARROW-262, the {{Struct}} name is reserved in Flatbuffers, so we temporarily used the `{{Tuple}}` name. We should either use a tweaked name like {{Struct_}} that does not cause conflicts or choose a name for the Struct concept (e.g. {{Tuple}}) and use that consistently in format documents and implementation.
> The least disruptive solution is to use the {{Struct_}} name in the Flatbuffers IDL.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)